Comments on: Bah. Who needs search? (UPDATED) http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/18/bah-who-needs-search/ Can you think of a better name? Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Fagstein http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/18/bah-who-needs-search/comment-page-1/#comment-487 Fagstein Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:11:29 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=411#comment-487 Two points for 1-10 and the grammatical silliness. The third story is in fact from the Gazette (a problem related to previously-discussed errors). Two points for 1-10 and the grammatical silliness.

The third story is in fact from the Gazette (a problem related to previously-discussed errors).

]]> By: princess iveylocks http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/18/bah-who-needs-search/comment-page-1/#comment-485 princess iveylocks Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:49:01 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=411#comment-485 1-10 of *4* results 3rd entry is from canada.com (not specifically the Gazette) titles 1+2 do not match their story (as it appears to be just one article) "List of the 30 days Archived & Search" is not a proper sentence in the English language no dateline on stories (not an error, just a stupid omission) 1-10 of *4* results

3rd entry is from canada.com (not specifically the Gazette)

titles 1+2 do not match their story (as it appears to be just one article)

"List of the 30 days Archived & Search" is not a proper sentence in the English language

no dateline on stories (not an error, just a stupid omission)

]]> By: Fagstein http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/18/bah-who-needs-search/comment-page-1/#comment-484 Fagstein Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:08:47 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=411#comment-484 The first two are definitely correct. I'll give you a bonus point on your third. Your fourth point is included in the first: the content is part of sidebar content outside the article (which is all part of one big screw-up) And I won't penalize them for a lack of an advanced feature. There's two more. One technical, one editorial. The first two are definitely correct.
I'll give you a bonus point on your third.
Your fourth point is included in the first: the content is part of sidebar content outside the article (which is all part of one big screw-up)
And I won't penalize them for a lack of an advanced feature.

There's two more. One technical, one editorial.

]]> By: heri http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/18/bah-who-needs-search/comment-page-1/#comment-481 heri Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:57:07 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=411#comment-481 * irrelevant results * it says it has 4 results but only 3 shown * the 3rd results doesnt seem to have the query words in it * 2 different results with different titles has the same content * no tips for searching for the user, who is now stuck (like "did you mean" or "change your search to..." * irrelevant results
* it says it has 4 results but only 3 shown
* the 3rd results doesnt seem to have the query words in it
* 2 different results with different titles has the same content
* no tips for searching for the user, who is now stuck (like "did you mean" or "change your search to..."

]]>