<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feeding parking meters voluntarily?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/19/feeding-parking-meters-voluntarily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/19/feeding-parking-meters-voluntarily/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; Mayor Labonté</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/19/feeding-parking-meters-voluntarily/comment-page-1/#comment-24603</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; Mayor Labonté</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=417#comment-24603</guid>
		<description>[...] introduced the Parco-don, a voluntary parking meter that accepts all those pennies we have no other use for, and distributes the money raised to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] introduced the Parco-don, a voluntary parking meter that accepts all those pennies we have no other use for, and distributes the money raised to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/19/feeding-parking-meters-voluntarily/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=417#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Spoken like a true non-driver.

I notice too that this group has partnered with advertising companies to make this happen. Did none of them think that parking meters have a bad reputation in this city?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken like a true non-driver.</p>
<p>I notice too that this group has partnered with advertising companies to make this happen. Did none of them think that parking meters have a bad reputation in this city?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princess iveylocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/19/feeding-parking-meters-voluntarily/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>princess iveylocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=417#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Two points:

1) That prototype (I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s theirs and not yours... image credit?) is poorly designed. Without your explanation, I had no idea what it was for, or what it benefits. I&#039;m still not sure how credible L&#039;Itineraire is; although, strangely, if they put up fake parking meters, it might function as good PR.

2) By operating parking meters, Montreal is not &quot;taking away hard-earned money&quot;, rather, people who choose to operate a motor vehicle and park it downtown are paying the opportunity cost of having the government provide roads for them to drive on. They&#039;re directly funding a service based on usage (think toll roads), instead of supporting it indirectly via taxes. (I realise this concept is strange to Quebeckers...) Tim Harford&#039;s &quot;The Undercover Economist&quot; has an excellent explanation of why the difference matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two points:</p>
<p>1) That prototype (I'm assuming it's theirs and not yours... image credit?) is poorly designed. Without your explanation, I had no idea what it was for, or what it benefits. I'm still not sure how credible L'Itineraire is; although, strangely, if they put up fake parking meters, it might function as good PR.</p>
<p>2) By operating parking meters, Montreal is not "taking away hard-earned money", rather, people who choose to operate a motor vehicle and park it downtown are paying the opportunity cost of having the government provide roads for them to drive on. They're directly funding a service based on usage (think toll roads), instead of supporting it indirectly via taxes. (I realise this concept is strange to Quebeckers...) Tim Harford's "The Undercover Economist" has an excellent explanation of why the difference matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

