<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canoe.ca: Look at our new mess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: princess iveylocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>princess iveylocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=458#comment-560</guid>
		<description>Your suggestion makes sense. It&#039;d be interesting to read your definition of &quot;news&quot; ... a fluid term at best, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your suggestion makes sense. It'd be interesting to read your definition of "news" ... a fluid term at best, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=458#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Are you drunk? Again?

As for my madness, I would refer you to my &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.fagstein.com/?page_id=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;.

Not that I&#039;m against the hugs, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you drunk? Again?</p>
<p>As for my madness, I would refer you to my <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/?page_id=2" rel="nofollow">FAQ</a>.</p>
<p>Not that I'm against the hugs, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Lynn</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=458#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Why are you so mad?  You need hugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you so mad?  You need hugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=458#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Actually, the browser did most of the counting.

I can&#039;t imagine anyone who isn&#039;t an employee of Quebecor using Canoe.ca regularly, much less as their homepage.

But for those people who go there looking for stuff, why not make a simple portal, with links to the various sections? Keep the top news headlines there (by the way, very little on that page is actually news), and then link to the rest. Let people click once quickly through two simple pages instead of having to scan through one massive one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the browser did most of the counting.</p>
<p>I can't imagine anyone who isn't an employee of Quebecor using Canoe.ca regularly, much less as their homepage.</p>
<p>But for those people who go there looking for stuff, why not make a simple portal, with links to the various sections? Keep the top news headlines there (by the way, very little on that page is actually news), and then link to the rest. Let people click once quickly through two simple pages instead of having to scan through one massive one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princess iveylocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/06/27/canoeca-look-at-our-new-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>princess iveylocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=458#comment-555</guid>
		<description>I appreciate that you counted every single link on the homepage, Steve.

It doesn&#039;t look too bad to me, but I don&#039;t use Canoe.ca to &quot;find&quot; content... I use Google. The new interface is more pleasant for leisurely browsing. And, honestly, most users are probably looking for sports anyway, so it makes sense to direct them there more than once.

WHOA, POWER SURGE! YOU ROCK, ONTARIO! KEEP THAT A/C CRANKED TO THE MAX!

What was I saying, again? Oh. Right. The pages are weirdly long, I agree with you on that.

I think the unanswered question is: what kind of person routinely reads Canoe.ca, and how does this redesign affect their user experience? The reason CBC and G&amp;M redesigns drew so much attention is because web-literate consumers make up the bulk of those audiences, and they were ready to throw in their two cents every time font sizes went up a lousy pixel. Canoe always struck me as watered-down (excepting sports coverage; only tabloids can pull that off well...), and hence appealing to a more basic reader, someone less concerned about aesthetics and more concerned with consistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate that you counted every single link on the homepage, Steve.</p>
<p>It doesn't look too bad to me, but I don't use Canoe.ca to "find" content... I use Google. The new interface is more pleasant for leisurely browsing. And, honestly, most users are probably looking for sports anyway, so it makes sense to direct them there more than once.</p>
<p>WHOA, POWER SURGE! YOU ROCK, ONTARIO! KEEP THAT A/C CRANKED TO THE MAX!</p>
<p>What was I saying, again? Oh. Right. The pages are weirdly long, I agree with you on that.</p>
<p>I think the unanswered question is: what kind of person routinely reads Canoe.ca, and how does this redesign affect their user experience? The reason CBC and G&amp;M redesigns drew so much attention is because web-literate consumers make up the bulk of those audiences, and they were ready to throw in their two cents every time font sizes went up a lousy pixel. Canoe always struck me as watered-down (excepting sports coverage; only tabloids can pull that off well...), and hence appealing to a more basic reader, someone less concerned about aesthetics and more concerned with consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

