<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montreal&#8217;s bus death traps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrêt demandé &#124; journal</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-142226</link>
		<dc:creator>Arrêt demandé &#124; journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 05:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/#comment-142226</guid>
		<description>[...] Ces autobus ont apparu en 1996, et malgré leur air révolutionnaire, ont eu beaucoup de problèmes&#8230; Fagstein en fait d&#8217;ailleurs un bon résumé sur son blogue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ces autobus ont apparu en 1996, et malgré leur air révolutionnaire, ont eu beaucoup de problèmes&#8230; Fagstein en fait d&#8217;ailleurs un bon résumé sur son blogue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; The nitty-gritty of public consultations</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-30100</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; The nitty-gritty of public consultations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/#comment-30100</guid>
		<description>[...] LFS low-floor buses (16, 17 and 18 series buses from 1996-98 which are considered lemons if not death traps) will be phased out by 2010. It&#8217;s unclear whether their retirements will come before those of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LFS low-floor buses (16, 17 and 18 series buses from 1996-98 which are considered lemons if not death traps) will be phased out by 2010. It&#8217;s unclear whether their retirements will come before those of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogus Bus</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-28760</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogus Bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/#comment-28760</guid>
		<description>The other issue with these buses is they hold about 25% fewer passengers than their predecessors and have awkwardly designed seating arrangements, narrower walkway, and steps at the back which divide the space even further.  Get one wheelchair or a couple baby strollers in there and people have trouble getting on and off the bus, stops take longer, and people fall over each other more often.

While accessibility is always the goal, these kind of compromises make it a negative gain.  Particularly when the wheelchair lifts regularly fail.

The only people who would buy this bus for a Montreal, urban setting are people who never take the bus.  That is, STM administration.  Incompetent design, bought by incompetent managers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other issue with these buses is they hold about 25% fewer passengers than their predecessors and have awkwardly designed seating arrangements, narrower walkway, and steps at the back which divide the space even further.  Get one wheelchair or a couple baby strollers in there and people have trouble getting on and off the bus, stops take longer, and people fall over each other more often.</p>
<p>While accessibility is always the goal, these kind of compromises make it a negative gain.  Particularly when the wheelchair lifts regularly fail.</p>
<p>The only people who would buy this bus for a Montreal, urban setting are people who never take the bus.  That is, STM administration.  Incompetent design, bought by incompetent managers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buses in flames &#171; The Transitive: Montreal In Transit</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-24530</link>
		<dc:creator>Buses in flames &#171; The Transitive: Montreal In Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/#comment-24530</guid>
		<description>[...] Faguy goes into some detail about some of the problems of the secondg-eneration low-floor buses the STM began using in 1996. He also talks about problems with safety, including their tendancies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Faguy goes into some detail about some of the problems of the secondg-eneration low-floor buses the STM began using in 1996. He also talks about problems with safety, including their tendancies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; Hybrid buses coming</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; Hybrid buses coming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>[...] let us celebrate the awarding of a new contract to NovaBus, a company that loves to create lemons when experimenting with new designs for buses, confident that because they&#8217;re the only Quebec [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let us celebrate the awarding of a new contract to NovaBus, a company that loves to create lemons when experimenting with new designs for buses, confident that because they&#8217;re the only Quebec [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; Bus plans have good ideas and stupid gimmicks</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; Bus plans have good ideas and stupid gimmicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/08/29/lfs-problems/#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>[...] from 1,600 to 2,100 buses (which means a lot of bus-buying if they&#8217;re going to replace the death traps currently on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from 1,600 to 2,100 buses (which means a lot of bus-buying if they&#8217;re going to replace the death traps currently on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

