<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Accessible Channel: More talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; CRTC roundup: CTV wants everything in HD</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-35052</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; CRTC roundup: CTV wants everything in HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/#comment-35052</guid>
		<description>[...] EqualiTV, a disability issues network which sounds a lot like the Accessible Channel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EqualiTV, a disability issues network which sounds a lot like the Accessible Channel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;azile &#187; a new television channel for the blind and visually-impaired</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;azile &#187; a new television channel for the blind and visually-impaired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>[...] have been meaning to write about this but stuff got in the way. I read on the Fagstein blog a couple of weeks ago that there will be a new television channel in Canada: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been meaning to write about this but stuff got in the way. I read on the Fagstein blog a couple of weeks ago that there will be a new television channel in Canada: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zara</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>zara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/09/03/accessible-channel/#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>While this may be better than nothing, obviously, the best thing would be to have all shows on all channels audio-described. Those who would want to activate it, would just press whatever button on the remote, just like with closed captioning.

To be honest, I wonder if this is just a way of letting Canadian broadcasters off the hook. I am no specialist on television matters but from what I understand, Canada is far behind with regards to audio description (and not doing all that great a job with closed captioning either). Now, they can point to the Accessible Channel and say &quot;look, we do not have to because there is a specialty channel that takes care of all that&quot; (which will probably carry mostly US shows in any case).

Anyway, thanks for the heads-up on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this may be better than nothing, obviously, the best thing would be to have all shows on all channels audio-described. Those who would want to activate it, would just press whatever button on the remote, just like with closed captioning.</p>
<p>To be honest, I wonder if this is just a way of letting Canadian broadcasters off the hook. I am no specialist on television matters but from what I understand, Canada is far behind with regards to audio description (and not doing all that great a job with closed captioning either). Now, they can point to the Accessible Channel and say "look, we do not have to because there is a specialty channel that takes care of all that" (which will probably carry mostly US shows in any case).</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the heads-up on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

