<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kicking a reporter out: Good for journalism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/11/20/kicking-a-reporter-out-good-for-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/11/20/kicking-a-reporter-out-good-for-journalism/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/11/20/kicking-a-reporter-out-good-for-journalism/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/11/20/kicking-a-reporter-out-good-for-journalism/#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>I dunno. What obligations do political parties have to make their meetings and processes and such open to the public? Because if the answer to that is "none", then it seems to me QS has every right to kick whoever they like out of their meetings, for whatever reason they like.

It's definitely dumb (don't you want stories in the newspaper if you're QS? even if they're unfavourable?), but wrong? I don't think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. What obligations do political parties have to make their meetings and processes and such open to the public? Because if the answer to that is &#8220;none&#8221;, then it seems to me QS has every right to kick whoever they like out of their meetings, for whatever reason they like.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely dumb (don&#8217;t you want stories in the newspaper if you&#8217;re QS? even if they&#8217;re unfavourable?), but wrong? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
