<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montreal Geography Trivia No. 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yul B.</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-7313</link>
		<dc:creator>Yul B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-7313</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  My MapArt book doesn't have the Dorchester name for Montreal East on either the map or the index.  But Google does.

Not the first error I've found with MapArt, either.  I should write them and complain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  My MapArt book doesn&#8217;t have the Dorchester name for Montreal East on either the map or the index.  But Google does.</p>
<p>Not the first error I&#8217;ve found with MapArt, either.  I should write them and complain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-7022</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-7022</guid>
		<description>Bingo. Give yourself a pat on the back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo. Give yourself a pat on the back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alanah</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-7008</link>
		<dc:creator>Alanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-7008</guid>
		<description>Got it! Group A all have segments in Pte-aux-trembles. Dorchester really threw me off, but there is a section of the old anglo name out east there!

As for Sherbrooke and Notre Dame, they do exist in pte-aux-trembles, but aren't segmented...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it! Group A all have segments in Pte-aux-trembles. Dorchester really threw me off, but there is a section of the old anglo name out east there!</p>
<p>As for Sherbrooke and Notre Dame, they do exist in pte-aux-trembles, but aren&#8217;t segmented&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6928</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6928</guid>
		<description>The answer will come on Monday if nobody gets it by then.

Come on, just expand your horizons a bit.

Literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer will come on Monday if nobody gets it by then.</p>
<p>Come on, just expand your horizons a bit.</p>
<p>Literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blork</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6926</link>
		<dc:creator>blork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6926</guid>
		<description>This quiz is dead. Givvis the answer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This quiz is dead. Givvis the answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6452</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6452</guid>
		<description>I was about to give you a point for that, but there's a St. Antoine in Lachine.

Try again, you're getting warmer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to give you a point for that, but there&#8217;s a St. Antoine in Lachine.</p>
<p>Try again, you&#8217;re getting warmer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>Ok I think I got it. The names in group A are used on multiple streets within the city of Montreal. The names in Group B are unique to one street in the city of Montreal. There's a Sherbrooke Street in Beaconsfield, so technically it belongs to Group B according to my phrasing, but it would be part of group A if you include the entire island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I think I got it. The names in group A are used on multiple streets within the city of Montreal. The names in Group B are unique to one street in the city of Montreal. There&#8217;s a Sherbrooke Street in Beaconsfield, so technically it belongs to Group B according to my phrasing, but it would be part of group A if you include the entire island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6445</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6445</guid>
		<description>You are making an assumption. Try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are making an assumption. Try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6444</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6444</guid>
		<description>How about this? The streets in group A switch from being one way to going in both directions. The streets in Group B are either all one way across their entire length, or they run in both directions their entire length....Except St Jaques switches to a 2 way street in NDG, which would put it in Group A, so I guess that's wrong too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this? The streets in group A switch from being one way to going in both directions. The streets in Group B are either all one way across their entire length, or they run in both directions their entire length&#8230;.Except St Jaques switches to a 2 way street in NDG, which would put it in Group A, so I guess that&#8217;s wrong too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6443</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6443</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I'm making a false assumption myself, but it seems to me that it's impossible to zoom in on 'the neighbourhood they occupy together', since Ontario and Dorchester (to take two) occupy neither the same borough nor the same municipality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m making a false assumption myself, but it seems to me that it&#8217;s impossible to zoom in on &#8216;the neighbourhood they occupy together&#8217;, since Ontario and Dorchester (to take two) occupy neither the same borough nor the same municipality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>Blork,

one of your assumptions is wrong.

Here's a way to test it:

1. Find the names in group 1 on a map
2. Zoom in to the neighbourhood they occupy together
3. You've made an assumption. Repeat from step 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blork,</p>
<p>one of your assumptions is wrong.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a way to test it:</p>
<p>1. Find the names in group 1 on a map<br />
2. Zoom in to the neighbourhood they occupy together<br />
3. You&#8217;ve made an assumption. Repeat from step 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blork</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6411</link>
		<dc:creator>blork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6411</guid>
		<description>I'm about ready to give up. Number 2 was about the fact that rue Ontario is divided up into different bits. That doesn't work here, as Ontario is in the first group, along with Dorchester, which is NOT broken into bits (at least not with the same name) and is separate from the second group, which includes the chopped up de Maisonneuve. 

So it's not about one group being continuous and the other not. Nor is it about one group crossing different urban environments.

So I'm stumped. But I will blame it on the phrasing of the question, which asks "What do the following names have in common..." which implies it is the NAMES not the STREETS THEMSELVES that have commonalities and differences.

So you've confused me too much. It's all your fault. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about ready to give up. Number 2 was about the fact that rue Ontario is divided up into different bits. That doesn&#8217;t work here, as Ontario is in the first group, along with Dorchester, which is NOT broken into bits (at least not with the same name) and is separate from the second group, which includes the chopped up de Maisonneuve. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not about one group being continuous and the other not. Nor is it about one group crossing different urban environments.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m stumped. But I will blame it on the phrasing of the question, which asks &#8220;What do the following names have in common&#8230;&#8221; which implies it is the NAMES not the STREETS THEMSELVES that have commonalities and differences.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;ve confused me too much. It&#8217;s all your fault. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christelle</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6352</link>
		<dc:creator>Christelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6352</guid>
		<description>group a has unconnected parts? :P and not group b?? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>group a has unconnected parts? :P and not group b?? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>OK, here you go then:

It's somewhat related to &lt;a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/11/19/montreal-geography-trivia-no-2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;MGT No. 2&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here you go then:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s somewhat related to <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/11/19/montreal-geography-trivia-no-2/" rel="nofollow">MGT No. 2</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blork</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6277</link>
		<dc:creator>blork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6277</guid>
		<description>More hints! I'm really stumped on this. It's not the orientation on the map, it's not the one-way or two-wayness... 

???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More hints! I&#8217;m really stumped on this. It&#8217;s not the orientation on the map, it&#8217;s not the one-way or two-wayness&#8230; </p>
<p>???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6268</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6268</guid>
		<description>Edna, you fail AGAIN.

De Maisonneuve, St. Jacques and St. Antoine are all new names for old streets.

Come on, anyone? Do I need to give another hint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edna, you fail AGAIN.</p>
<p>De Maisonneuve, St. Jacques and St. Antoine are all new names for old streets.</p>
<p>Come on, anyone? Do I need to give another hint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6267</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6267</guid>
		<description>Umn ... they were all once known by other names?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umn &#8230; they were all once known by other names?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>Nope nope nope.

Here's a hint: Sherbrooke and Notre-Dame could be placed in either category, depending on how you phrase the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope nope nope.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a hint: Sherbrooke and Notre-Dame could be placed in either category, depending on how you phrase the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serge</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6244</link>
		<dc:creator>serge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6244</guid>
		<description>Group A goes north/south group B east/west.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Group A goes north/south group B east/west.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desmond Bliek</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6234</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmond Bliek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2007/12/03/montreal-geography-trivia-no-4/#comment-6234</guid>
		<description>My guess is that one could say that the metro runs under the latter group (at least in certain stretches), but I'm not entirely sure about Saint-Jacques.  It'd have to be for only a short stretch between Vendome and Place-Saint-Henri stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that one could say that the metro runs under the latter group (at least in certain stretches), but I&#8217;m not entirely sure about Saint-Jacques.  It&#8217;d have to be for only a short stretch between Vendome and Place-Saint-Henri stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
