<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBC launches two boring digital TV channels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-24596</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/#comment-24596</guid>
		<description>The CBC currently doesn&#039;t have a license for a companion HD channel for Documentary. In any case, it probably wouldn&#039;t be all that useful, since most of the programming is coming from the CBC&#039;s and NFB&#039;s archives and is available only in standard definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBC currently doesn't have a license for a companion HD channel for Documentary. In any case, it probably wouldn't be all that useful, since most of the programming is coming from the CBC's and NFB's archives and is available only in standard definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-24578</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/#comment-24578</guid>
		<description>I think Bold could be good if they were to take a shot at creating Canadian versions of PBS performing arts staples like &#039;Great Performances&#039;, &#039;Austin City Limits&#039;, &#039;American Masters&#039;, as opposed to showing reruns of dramas no one watched the first time around.

I think Documentary could become my favorite channel on television if they would broadcast in HD. I bought my HDTV a couple of months ago, and never would have guessed just how much I prefer the HD broadcasts - to the point that I would rather head out and rent a documentary from my video store rather than watch a SD feed from the Documentary Channel. Any word on if/how/whether it will be possible for CBC to broadcast Documentary in HD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bold could be good if they were to take a shot at creating Canadian versions of PBS performing arts staples like 'Great Performances', 'Austin City Limits', 'American Masters', as opposed to showing reruns of dramas no one watched the first time around.</p>
<p>I think Documentary could become my favorite channel on television if they would broadcast in HD. I bought my HDTV a couple of months ago, and never would have guessed just how much I prefer the HD broadcasts - to the point that I would rather head out and rent a documentary from my video store rather than watch a SD feed from the Documentary Channel. Any word on if/how/whether it will be possible for CBC to broadcast Documentary in HD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-24475</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/#comment-24475</guid>
		<description>Yes, the doc channel has great stuff. Can&#039;t say I care for the near-identical lowercase d and b logos branding both channels, but I suppose that doesn&#039;t matter much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the doc channel has great stuff. Can't say I care for the near-identical lowercase d and b logos branding both channels, but I suppose that doesn't matter much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blork</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-24455</link>
		<dc:creator>blork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/#comment-24455</guid>
		<description>Hell yeah! Did you see the doc that was on last night about Dubai? Really something. I loves me some documentary channel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell yeah! Did you see the doc that was on last night about Dubai? Really something. I loves me some documentary channel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVE ID</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-24452</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVE ID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/03/29/cbc-launches-two-boring-digital-tv-channels/#comment-24452</guid>
		<description>Dude, documentary is not boring. It has run some awesome docs. It could be better for sure, but its not boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, documentary is not boring. It has run some awesome docs. It could be better for sure, but its not boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

