<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I don&#8217;t need your help, Cyberpresse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-28079</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1724#comment-28079</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on that one Fagstein. They&#039;re often not needed, and they&#039;re simply ugly.

And any new system needs a button, hence new pollution in many of the world&#039;s blogs. Plugins for these kinds of things should go in the reader&#039;s browser, and not in the page. Cyberpresse doesn&#039;t have to care who uses which services to bookmark/submit their stories. I can&#039;t believe someone who really wouldn&#039;t bookmark a noteworthy story because there&#039;s no link to it made easy.

I remember a blog which had 40 (FORTY!!) of those small &quot;link to me in %^$&quot; links. the blog was pretty much nothing I&#039;d like to link to, and the guy only have 1-2 comments per post, max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on that one Fagstein. They're often not needed, and they're simply ugly.</p>
<p>And any new system needs a button, hence new pollution in many of the world's blogs. Plugins for these kinds of things should go in the reader's browser, and not in the page. Cyberpresse doesn't have to care who uses which services to bookmark/submit their stories. I can't believe someone who really wouldn't bookmark a noteworthy story because there's no link to it made easy.</p>
<p>I remember a blog which had 40 (FORTY!!) of those small "link to me in %^$" links. the blog was pretty much nothing I'd like to link to, and the guy only have 1-2 comments per post, max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-28036</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1724#comment-28036</guid>
		<description>ah et en passant, je ne les défends pas ... j&#039;essaie juste de te faire comprendre que tes critiques ne tiennent pas compte de leurs réalités :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah et en passant, je ne les défends pas ... j'essaie juste de te faire comprendre que tes critiques ne tiennent pas compte de leurs réalités :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-28024</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1724#comment-28024</guid>
		<description>Putting video on youtube is not a solution to be able to put ads on it ... 

simple solution for a blogger, not a solution for cyberpresse. 

Putting your content on youtube means you are giving the rights of that content to google ... 

Aint a solution at all ..

For your print solution ... it is easy cause you are using wordpress ... the CMS they must be using is much more complicated than using wordpress ...

Easy to compare your blog to cyberpresse ... another thing to understand the complexity of putting content of different sources on a site ... 

Like i said ... propose real solution and they will be pleased to understand them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting video on youtube is not a solution to be able to put ads on it ... </p>
<p>simple solution for a blogger, not a solution for cyberpresse. </p>
<p>Putting your content on youtube means you are giving the rights of that content to google ... </p>
<p>Aint a solution at all ..</p>
<p>For your print solution ... it is easy cause you are using wordpress ... the CMS they must be using is much more complicated than using wordpress ...</p>
<p>Easy to compare your blog to cyberpresse ... another thing to understand the complexity of putting content of different sources on a site ... </p>
<p>Like i said ... propose real solution and they will be pleased to understand them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-27980</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1724#comment-27980</guid>
		<description>They could put their videos on YouTube, where they can be linked to and embedded.

Print-friendly pages could be developed with print stylesheets (I have one on this blog, it&#039;s not that hard)

A cleanup of busy navigation sections would help quite a bit as well.

Any other solutions I can suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could put their videos on YouTube, where they can be linked to and embedded.</p>
<p>Print-friendly pages could be developed with print stylesheets (I have one on this blog, it's not that hard)</p>
<p>A cleanup of busy navigation sections would help quite a bit as well.</p>
<p>Any other solutions I can suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-27976</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1724#comment-27976</guid>
		<description>Un petit peu chialeux sur ce post-ci ne trouves-tu pas?

Knowing the number of people working at cyberpresse (30) they are using modules that are built by others ...

So it is Stream the world that are doing the video platform ... 

If you have better solution, I am sure they would be interested in knowing them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Un petit peu chialeux sur ce post-ci ne trouves-tu pas?</p>
<p>Knowing the number of people working at cyberpresse (30) they are using modules that are built by others ...</p>
<p>So it is Stream the world that are doing the video platform ... </p>
<p>If you have better solution, I am sure they would be interested in knowing them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/02/i-dont-need-your-help-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-27963</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1724#comment-27963</guid>
		<description>I like the share links but agree that there are too many networks so too many buttons. I recently started using Digg and I love it. I would say that the share buttons should be bigger and easier to find because on alot of sites they are not, if they have them at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the share links but agree that there are too many networks so too many buttons. I recently started using Digg and I love it. I would say that the share buttons should be bigger and easier to find because on alot of sites they are not, if they have them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

