<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Choice is too good for RDI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/17/starchoice-is-too-good-for-rdi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/17/starchoice-is-too-good-for-rdi/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/17/starchoice-is-too-good-for-rdi/comment-page-1/#comment-213970</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1787#comment-213970</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s odd that someone says that RDI is not on StarChoice. I do subscribe to Starchoice and RDI was always available on channel 730.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The complaint was that RDI wasn&#039;t on the basic package in anglophone markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It's odd that someone says that RDI is not on StarChoice. I do subscribe to Starchoice and RDI was always available on channel 730.</p></blockquote>
<p>The complaint was that RDI wasn't on the basic package in anglophone markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane Marcotte</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/17/starchoice-is-too-good-for-rdi/comment-page-1/#comment-213954</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane Marcotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 02:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1787#comment-213954</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s odd that someone says that RDI is not on StarChoice. I do subscribe to Starchoice and RDI was always available on channel 730. The thing that the CBC is telling is probably that the newer HD version of RDI is not available yet. Neither CBC Newsworld or CTV Nesw.

Thank&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's odd that someone says that RDI is not on StarChoice. I do subscribe to Starchoice and RDI was always available on channel 730. The thing that the CBC is telling is probably that the newer HD version of RDI is not available yet. Neither CBC Newsworld or CTV Nesw.</p>
<p>Thank's</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/05/17/starchoice-is-too-good-for-rdi/comment-page-1/#comment-30548</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1787#comment-30548</guid>
		<description>&quot;The CBC is complaining to the CRTC because Canadian satellite TV provider Star Choice does not include francophone all-news channel RDI as part of its basic lineup...

Then again, it’s not the only company that thinks CRTC rules are just a suggestion — *cough* *cough*)...&quot;
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank GOD &quot;someone&quot; is violating the CRTC rules( *puke* *puke*).
 Thankyou, that has now just about made up my mind.
Goddbye to Rogers&#039;!  and hello to StarChoice.

I just hope they, and anyone else keep &quot;violating&quot; CRTC rules. WHY?,
BECAUSE I WANT THE CHOICE TO WATCH ANY BROADCAST/CHANNEL BE IT STATES-SIDE OR NOT. IF I CHOOSE NO FRANCPHONE THATS MY &quot;PAID&quot; RIGHT.

Why should I care what the CRTC, or Quebec wants ? -&quot;THEY&quot; are not paying for it
I AM - CANADIAN !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The CBC is complaining to the CRTC because Canadian satellite TV provider Star Choice does not include francophone all-news channel RDI as part of its basic lineup...</p>
<p>Then again, it’s not the only company that thinks CRTC rules are just a suggestion — *cough* *cough*)..."<br />
-------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p>Thank GOD "someone" is violating the CRTC rules( *puke* *puke*).<br />
 Thankyou, that has now just about made up my mind.<br />
Goddbye to Rogers'!  and hello to StarChoice.</p>
<p>I just hope they, and anyone else keep "violating" CRTC rules. WHY?,<br />
BECAUSE I WANT THE CHOICE TO WATCH ANY BROADCAST/CHANNEL BE IT STATES-SIDE OR NOT. IF I CHOOSE NO FRANCPHONE THATS MY "PAID" RIGHT.</p>
<p>Why should I care what the CRTC, or Quebec wants ? -"THEY" are not paying for it<br />
I AM - CANADIAN !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

