Comments on: CTV, TQS move to sucker-generated content http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/04/ctv-tqs-move-to-sucker-generated-content/ Can you think of a better name? Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:48:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Mario Asselin http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/04/ctv-tqs-move-to-sucker-generated-content/#comment-32712 Mario Asselin Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:53:13 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1835#comment-32712 So Michel, if I am «enthusiast»... I expose myself to be «bullshiteux»? How can I say that I believe in «Web 2.0» (Web participatif) for more networking and rich communities without selling my soul to evil? So Michel, if I am «enthusiast»… I expose myself to be «bullshiteux»?

How can I say that I believe in «Web 2.0» (Web participatif) for more networking and rich communities without selling my soul to evil?

]]> By: Michel Dumais http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/04/ctv-tqs-move-to-sucker-generated-content/#comment-32636 Michel Dumais Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:45:09 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1835#comment-32636 No, no, no, no! Please Faguy, don't ever call me a Web 2.0 enthusiast. I'm not a «bullshiteux marketeux». ;-) Skeptical, yup. Critical, yup. But no enthusiast. No, no, no, no! Please Faguy, don’t ever call me a Web 2.0 enthusiast. I’m not a «bullshiteux marketeux». ;-) Skeptical, yup. Critical, yup. But no enthusiast.

]]> By: DAVE ID http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/04/ctv-tqs-move-to-sucker-generated-content/#comment-32630 DAVE ID Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:38:52 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1835#comment-32630 Your contempt for viewer generated news is warranted. Your contempt of the viewer/reader (the bread and butter of your business) is deplorable. You should turn your contempt towards your masters who are the ones enabling this crowdsourcing crap instead of sticking to their guns of good journalism (though I have seen little of that in the past few years). This is like blaming the Indians for having jobs in India that have been outsourced by North American companies. Blame the companies who outsource, not the Indian dude who wants a good paying job. Your contempt for viewer generated news is warranted. Your contempt of the viewer/reader (the bread and butter of your business) is deplorable. You should turn your contempt towards your masters who are the ones enabling this crowdsourcing crap instead of sticking to their guns of good journalism (though I have seen little of that in the past few years). This is like blaming the Indians for having jobs in India that have been outsourced by North American companies. Blame the companies who outsource, not the Indian dude who wants a good paying job.

]]> By: BruB http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/04/ctv-tqs-move-to-sucker-generated-content/#comment-32628 BruB Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:23:33 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1835#comment-32628 It is exploitation but with the web and the now 30 seconds of fame that it promises, you will always have suckers for that type of "journalism" but CNN as been doing it for a bout a year now with it's iReport. Does it make better television, no, but keep in mind that for every sucker that send a video, 20 others will look at it. it's called the youtube generation. It is exploitation but with the web and the now 30 seconds of fame that it promises, you will always have suckers for that type of “journalism” but CNN as been doing it for a bout a year now with it’s iReport.

Does it make better television, no, but keep in mind that for every sucker that send a video, 20 others will look at it. it’s called the youtube generation.

]]>