<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another blogger war with the Evil MSM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/18/ap-vs-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/18/ap-vs-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/18/ap-vs-bloggers/#comment-33933</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1888#comment-33933</guid>
		<description>why go after bloggers?  if anything, wouldn't blogs linking to AP articles increase ad revenues for websites carrying such wire stories, like Yahoo News or Newsday?  seems more like rabid technophobia than intellecutal property protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why go after bloggers?  if anything, wouldn&#8217;t blogs linking to AP articles increase ad revenues for websites carrying such wire stories, like Yahoo News or Newsday?  seems more like rabid technophobia than intellecutal property protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
