<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paris-Match screws up on Quebec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/27/paris-match-gets-quebec-400-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/27/paris-match-gets-quebec-400-wrong/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; Regret the Error year in review</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/27/paris-match-gets-quebec-400-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-55361</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; Regret the Error year in review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1929#comment-55361</guid>
		<description>[...] It also mentions the Paris Match province-vs-city mistake on Quebec&#8217;s 400th anniversary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It also mentions the Paris Match province-vs-city mistake on Quebec&#8217;s 400th anniversary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoque Paul McCartney &#171; AngryFrenchGuy</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/27/paris-match-gets-quebec-400-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-35970</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoque Paul McCartney &#171; AngryFrenchGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1929#comment-35970</guid>
		<description>[...] hey, contrary to what Stephen Harper, Pauline Marois and Paris Match have tried to tell you, this summer&#8217;s celebration is not about Canada, the Québec Nation or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hey, contrary to what Stephen Harper, Pauline Marois and Paris Match have tried to tell you, this summer&#8217;s celebration is not about Canada, the Québec Nation or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/27/paris-match-gets-quebec-400-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34697</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1929#comment-34697</guid>
		<description>They misplaced ''de'' and ''du'', not ''à'' and ''au''.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They misplaced &#8221;de&#8221; and &#8221;du&#8221;, not &#8221;à&#8221; and &#8221;au&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/06/27/paris-match-gets-quebec-400-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34522</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1929#comment-34522</guid>
		<description>I had a similar reaction to yours while reading &lt;a href="http://www2.canoe.com/cgi-bin/imprimer.cgi?id=374503" rel="nofollow"&gt;a Journal piece about a faux-federalist at the St-Jean parade&lt;/a&gt; (investigative journalism at its finest, as always). One of the people approached offered "Le Québec existait 250 ans avant le Canada." The person here, near as I can tell, is comparing the establishment of the City of Quebec to the confederation of Canada. Apples and oranges? Quebec and Canada have so many historical juxtapositions, both as identities (Colons français &#62; habitants &#62; Canayiens/Canadiens &#62; Canadien-français &#62; Québécois) and as geopolitical entities (Nouvelle-France/Canada &#62; Province of Québec &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Province_of_Quebec_%281763%E2%80%931791%29" rel="nofollow"&gt;(v1.0)&lt;/a&gt; &#62; Upper Canada/Haut-Canada and Bas-Canada/Lower Canada &#62; United Province of Canada/Canada-Uni &#62; Québec, province of (Dominion of) Canada).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar reaction to yours while reading <a href="http://www2.canoe.com/cgi-bin/imprimer.cgi?id=374503" rel="nofollow">a Journal piece about a faux-federalist at the St-Jean parade</a> (investigative journalism at its finest, as always). One of the people approached offered &#8220;Le Québec existait 250 ans avant le Canada.&#8221; The person here, near as I can tell, is comparing the establishment of the City of Quebec to the confederation of Canada. Apples and oranges? Quebec and Canada have so many historical juxtapositions, both as identities (Colons français &gt; habitants &gt; Canayiens/Canadiens &gt; Canadien-français &gt; Québécois) and as geopolitical entities (Nouvelle-France/Canada &gt; Province of Québec <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Province_of_Quebec_%281763%E2%80%931791%29" rel="nofollow">(v1.0)</a> &gt; Upper Canada/Haut-Canada and Bas-Canada/Lower Canada &gt; United Province of Canada/Canada-Uni &gt; Québec, province of (Dominion of) Canada).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
