<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This isn&#8217;t just about one photo of missiles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/11/iran-missile-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/11/iran-missile-photo/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: silhouette</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/11/iran-missile-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-35351</link>
		<dc:creator>silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1981#comment-35351</guid>
		<description>More missle photos spotted: http://www.flickr.com/photos/49403380@N00/2658316482/

I think they&#039;re serious now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More missle photos spotted: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49403380@N00/2658316482/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/49403380@N00/2658316482/</a></p>
<p>I think they're serious now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silhouette</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/11/iran-missile-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-35293</link>
		<dc:creator>silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1981#comment-35293</guid>
		<description>I think we know what the real threat is... it&#039;s Photoshop. (haha)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we know what the real threat is... it's Photoshop. (haha)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blork</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/11/iran-missile-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-35261</link>
		<dc:creator>Blork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=1981#comment-35261</guid>
		<description>A couple of quick observations:

1) I can&#039;t believe this got through. Even in the small, almost thumbnail size you reproduce here, I can spot the manipulation. Mind you, it&#039;s because I&#039;m looking for it, but when you&#039;re looking for it, it&#039;s very obvious. You&#039;d think the photo editors at the big news outlets would by now always be looking for it as a matter of course.

2) In this case (but certainly not in all cases), it doesn&#039;t really matter because it doesn&#039;t change the story. The story is that Iran is shooting off missiles. It doesn&#039;t matter if they shot three or four (especially since that fourth one is there, in the undoctored photo). The only thing about it that might matter is if # 4 didn&#039;t go off because of a misfire, which may say something about their technology, but we don&#039;t know that. Maybe it was timed a second or two off from the others. But the point remains that Iran is shooting off missiles, and this photoshop debate shoudn&#039;t detract from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of quick observations:</p>
<p>1) I can't believe this got through. Even in the small, almost thumbnail size you reproduce here, I can spot the manipulation. Mind you, it's because I'm looking for it, but when you're looking for it, it's very obvious. You'd think the photo editors at the big news outlets would by now always be looking for it as a matter of course.</p>
<p>2) In this case (but certainly not in all cases), it doesn't really matter because it doesn't change the story. The story is that Iran is shooting off missiles. It doesn't matter if they shot three or four (especially since that fourth one is there, in the undoctored photo). The only thing about it that might matter is if # 4 didn't go off because of a misfire, which may say something about their technology, but we don't know that. Maybe it was timed a second or two off from the others. But the point remains that Iran is shooting off missiles, and this photoshop debate shoudn't detract from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

