<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fair Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-38469</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-38469</guid>
		<description>LEAVE FAGSTEIN ALONE!!!

You're all a bunch of morons. He didn't make her look crazy, she made herself look crazy in her youtube video then the rest of you crazies demanded he interview her which he did and it turns out she really is crazy now you've all got your panties in a bunch.

Seriously, get a life.

Scientology FTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEAVE FAGSTEIN ALONE!!!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re all a bunch of morons. He didn&#8217;t make her look crazy, she made herself look crazy in her youtube video then the rest of you crazies demanded he interview her which he did and it turns out she really is crazy now you&#8217;ve all got your panties in a bunch.</p>
<p>Seriously, get a life.</p>
<p>Scientology FTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustifyyourExistence</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-38460</link>
		<dc:creator>JustifyyourExistence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-38460</guid>
		<description>Okay Mr. Fagstein, now for you to justify your existence. When you are writing as a journalist you are expected to have integrity and to research a topic, thoroughly, before you print it or do an interview. If you do not you will find the people who did bother to inform themselves rather  put out with you. They will be angry and they will say that they are angry. Do you really think that that paticular article was worthy of printing as a journalist? Think "If i were an award winning journalist known for his integrity and research abilities would i have ever admitted to writing this?" No probably not. 

"Oh but it was a hard hitting piece with tough questions that i asked an anonymous person as a (insert lousy defence of lack of research here)"

Really how interesting, now show me the research. I want to know why the anonymous are interested in protesting scientology, not in a 'journalist' doing his best to make a protester look crazy. Why not talk to someone who has been protesting scientology a long time as well now. I'm sure they could give you very clear examples of exactly what kind of harrassment Scientology is capable of. Why not look for Paulette Cooper's story aka operation freakout and flesh out your 'gee aren't i clever to make a protester look nutty' angle.' Or you could always google operation snow white or  normandy. Hey you want to talk to people who have grown up in scientology and know it better than you or i ever will, talk to Jenna Miscaviege Hill on exscientologykids. Or astra woodcroft on the same site. Go to enturbulation as well, there are a ton of survivor stories. Or you could just go to xenu(dot)net and look  at the link in the care package called 'what scientology doesn't want you to know.' 

FYI, recieveing three complaints about you at your place of employment before you have even started working there is fishy at best, could be an immature prank but it could also be fairgame. Scientology has been known to do this kind of stuff and worse, a moment of research would have revealed this. There are recorded incidences of this. There are two court cases in california alone where they have tried to get fair game constitutionally protected under the freedom of religion. The most notable one is wollersheim vs. Scientology. You can find links to these court documents on pretty much any website regarding courtroom since they are public. You can also find links on almost any critics page. 

Really the most i can say is that i am dissappointed in this article. If you want to make a protestor look nuts go for it but call it "Gee look at how clever i am" and put a big warning on it if you decide to just to cut and paste so that they will seem crazier than cruise. If you want to justify your existence why not write an article on scientology after you have thoroughly researched it both on the scientology approved webpages as well as on the critics pages. And  by thoroughly research it i mean thoroughly research it. Don't just glance at a page and call it a day. Documents, pictures, videos, court statments and rulings the whole nine yards. That is what you need to do to justify your existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Mr. Fagstein, now for you to justify your existence. When you are writing as a journalist you are expected to have integrity and to research a topic, thoroughly, before you print it or do an interview. If you do not you will find the people who did bother to inform themselves rather  put out with you. They will be angry and they will say that they are angry. Do you really think that that paticular article was worthy of printing as a journalist? Think &#8220;If i were an award winning journalist known for his integrity and research abilities would i have ever admitted to writing this?&#8221; No probably not. </p>
<p>&#8220;Oh but it was a hard hitting piece with tough questions that i asked an anonymous person as a (insert lousy defence of lack of research here)&#8221;</p>
<p>Really how interesting, now show me the research. I want to know why the anonymous are interested in protesting scientology, not in a &#8216;journalist&#8217; doing his best to make a protester look crazy. Why not talk to someone who has been protesting scientology a long time as well now. I&#8217;m sure they could give you very clear examples of exactly what kind of harrassment Scientology is capable of. Why not look for Paulette Cooper&#8217;s story aka operation freakout and flesh out your &#8216;gee aren&#8217;t i clever to make a protester look nutty&#8217; angle.&#8217; Or you could always google operation snow white or  normandy. Hey you want to talk to people who have grown up in scientology and know it better than you or i ever will, talk to Jenna Miscaviege Hill on exscientologykids. Or astra woodcroft on the same site. Go to enturbulation as well, there are a ton of survivor stories. Or you could just go to xenu(dot)net and look  at the link in the care package called &#8216;what scientology doesn&#8217;t want you to know.&#8217; </p>
<p>FYI, recieveing three complaints about you at your place of employment before you have even started working there is fishy at best, could be an immature prank but it could also be fairgame. Scientology has been known to do this kind of stuff and worse, a moment of research would have revealed this. There are recorded incidences of this. There are two court cases in california alone where they have tried to get fair game constitutionally protected under the freedom of religion. The most notable one is wollersheim vs. Scientology. You can find links to these court documents on pretty much any website regarding courtroom since they are public. You can also find links on almost any critics page. </p>
<p>Really the most i can say is that i am dissappointed in this article. If you want to make a protestor look nuts go for it but call it &#8220;Gee look at how clever i am&#8221; and put a big warning on it if you decide to just to cut and paste so that they will seem crazier than cruise. If you want to justify your existence why not write an article on scientology after you have thoroughly researched it both on the scientology approved webpages as well as on the critics pages. And  by thoroughly research it i mean thoroughly research it. Don&#8217;t just glance at a page and call it a day. Documents, pictures, videos, court statments and rulings the whole nine yards. That is what you need to do to justify your existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerald</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-38405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-38405</guid>
		<description>Ok guys,  the fact is the member of Anonymous just flat out give a bad interview.   She should have taken the time to find out this is the interviewer's style.   

On the other hand,  Fair Game is real and I would hope the reporter will take the time to learn more.   Just Google Scientology and Fair Game.  

Or visit Xenu.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok guys,  the fact is the member of Anonymous just flat out give a bad interview.   She should have taken the time to find out this is the interviewer&#8217;s style.   </p>
<p>On the other hand,  Fair Game is real and I would hope the reporter will take the time to learn more.   Just Google Scientology and Fair Game.  </p>
<p>Or visit Xenu.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-38198</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-38198</guid>
		<description>HaHa! Xenu did get to you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HaHa! Xenu did get to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kips</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-38177</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-38177</guid>
		<description>Wow, way to give no background whatsoever and ask your questions in a way that insinuates the interviewee is nuts from the start. You flat out admitted you were making fun of them. I've canceled my subscription to the Gazette, contacted your editor regarding your complete lack of journalistic integrity and urge others to do the same.

I don't even care about the bad coverage for Anonymous that came from this article, your "journalism" is a disgrace in and of itself. Way to be proud of misinforming the public, ya jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, way to give no background whatsoever and ask your questions in a way that insinuates the interviewee is nuts from the start. You flat out admitted you were making fun of them. I&#8217;ve canceled my subscription to the Gazette, contacted your editor regarding your complete lack of journalistic integrity and urge others to do the same.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even care about the bad coverage for Anonymous that came from this article, your &#8220;journalism&#8221; is a disgrace in and of itself. Way to be proud of misinforming the public, ya jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonA</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-38007</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-38007</guid>
		<description>Giving background on the church doesn't have to be the point of your article. But the fact that you DIDN'T give facts is HER point. A journalist shouldn't have a biased article. You're the neutral third party. You don't decide who's 'crazy' and then do your inner workings and editing to make them look how you want, you take equal portions of both sides and mesh them together. You can't say "Person A is harassing and sending death threats to Person B, but Person B just seems like the run of the mill looney crying wolf" without informing the public that "Person A is wanted in ten states for fifteen some-odd murders". You were deceptive in your article. You did no research. It's nothing more than your personal diary entry that has no business being in a journalists column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving background on the church doesn&#8217;t have to be the point of your article. But the fact that you DIDN&#8217;T give facts is HER point. A journalist shouldn&#8217;t have a biased article. You&#8217;re the neutral third party. You don&#8217;t decide who&#8217;s &#8216;crazy&#8217; and then do your inner workings and editing to make them look how you want, you take equal portions of both sides and mesh them together. You can&#8217;t say &#8220;Person A is harassing and sending death threats to Person B, but Person B just seems like the run of the mill looney crying wolf&#8221; without informing the public that &#8220;Person A is wanted in ten states for fifteen some-odd murders&#8221;. You were deceptive in your article. You did no research. It&#8217;s nothing more than your personal diary entry that has no business being in a journalists column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-37999</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-37999</guid>
		<description>April: I think the funniest thing about your comment is that you misspell my name while schooling me on how to do proper journalism.

If you see any factual errors in my article, I would be happy to alert my editor so the paper can run a correction. But the name of the column is "Justify your existence," and the entire point is to ask tough questions of your subject.

I'm sorry you don't think the article gave enough background on the evils of the Church of Scientology, but that wasn't the point of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April: I think the funniest thing about your comment is that you misspell my name while schooling me on how to do proper journalism.</p>
<p>If you see any factual errors in my article, I would be happy to alert my editor so the paper can run a correction. But the name of the column is &#8220;Justify your existence,&#8221; and the entire point is to ask tough questions of your subject.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry you don&#8217;t think the article gave enough background on the evils of the Church of Scientology, but that wasn&#8217;t the point of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-37977</link>
		<dc:creator>April</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-37977</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr.Fagay, 
I had the displeasure of reading  your interview this morning and have sent a letter of to the Gazette (found below) documenting this disatisfaction. While I am aware you are not a 'reputable' journalist, for them to publish your opinion when it was so evident you never researched your subject matter was dissapointing. I was not looking for you to side with anonymous but to give them a fair hearing. I too was put off by some of their antics but after hearing , on Radio-Canada, about Narconon Trois-Riviers (a scientology front group) deceptively trying to enter our schools I took an hour out of my day to find the disturbing history of Scientology. While sites like Xenu.net might lead you to some trusted news sources a google will lead you to them without ever having to enter a site by 'John-Doe' etc.  Nobody likes to have their time wasted and that is what your interview was, a waste of time. I entitled my letter "I don't expect to do a journalists work for them" and unless you do the research you are just another crazy ranting their uninformed opinions (granted in your case they were uniformed and biased questions). I expect better from both the Gazette and any rational and fairminded human being.

-April Hart

Gatzette letters----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was shocked and embarassed for the Gazette after reading Steve Fagay's article on your website. Living in NYC for the year I have counted on the Gazette to keep me in touch with the events of home but this article has made me question my decision. Mr. Fagay attempted to paint an anonymous protester as either crazy or bigoted in his article "Campaign of harassment or just a wild imagination" and his interview was so slanted my neck had a crick in it by the end. While there may well have been nothing to this womans particular claims his use of phrases such as "She's been protesting against the Church of Scientology, and now she thinks its members are out to get her" while never providing the information that Scientology is famous for illegal means of silencing its critics is down right dishonest. I believe that to this day the largest Canadian libel award ever paid was by Scientology in the case Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto. There are numerous other examples of their harrasment of critics documented in such reputable media as Times Magazine, CNN and the BBC. As a designer with her morning coffee I was able to gather this info in less than an hour, as a journalist Mr.Fagay's evident bias or laziness has done a disservice to both your readers and your reputation.
 
April Hart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr.Fagay,<br />
I had the displeasure of reading  your interview this morning and have sent a letter of to the Gazette (found below) documenting this disatisfaction. While I am aware you are not a &#8216;reputable&#8217; journalist, for them to publish your opinion when it was so evident you never researched your subject matter was dissapointing. I was not looking for you to side with anonymous but to give them a fair hearing. I too was put off by some of their antics but after hearing , on Radio-Canada, about Narconon Trois-Riviers (a scientology front group) deceptively trying to enter our schools I took an hour out of my day to find the disturbing history of Scientology. While sites like Xenu.net might lead you to some trusted news sources a google will lead you to them without ever having to enter a site by &#8216;John-Doe&#8217; etc.  Nobody likes to have their time wasted and that is what your interview was, a waste of time. I entitled my letter &#8220;I don&#8217;t expect to do a journalists work for them&#8221; and unless you do the research you are just another crazy ranting their uninformed opinions (granted in your case they were uniformed and biased questions). I expect better from both the Gazette and any rational and fairminded human being.</p>
<p>-April Hart</p>
<p>Gatzette letters&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I was shocked and embarassed for the Gazette after reading Steve Fagay&#8217;s article on your website. Living in NYC for the year I have counted on the Gazette to keep me in touch with the events of home but this article has made me question my decision. Mr. Fagay attempted to paint an anonymous protester as either crazy or bigoted in his article &#8220;Campaign of harassment or just a wild imagination&#8221; and his interview was so slanted my neck had a crick in it by the end. While there may well have been nothing to this womans particular claims his use of phrases such as &#8220;She&#8217;s been protesting against the Church of Scientology, and now she thinks its members are out to get her&#8221; while never providing the information that Scientology is famous for illegal means of silencing its critics is down right dishonest. I believe that to this day the largest Canadian libel award ever paid was by Scientology in the case Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto. There are numerous other examples of their harrasment of critics documented in such reputable media as Times Magazine, CNN and the BBC. As a designer with her morning coffee I was able to gather this info in less than an hour, as a journalist Mr.Fagay&#8217;s evident bias or laziness has done a disservice to both your readers and your reputation.</p>
<p>April Hart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Mueller</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-37973</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-37973</guid>
		<description>You think her story is far-fetched? In the 70s there was a case that was simply shocking. The "Church" of Scientology went after an author who had written a critical book about them, they actually tried to frame her for making bomb threats, threats they actually made themselves. She was completely exonerated when the FBI raided Scientology offices and seized documents, including documents detailing "Operation Freakout" - Scientology's codename for the ghastly operation.

The FBI raids were actually for a different reason - the largest domestic infiltration of the US Government in history was carried out by Scientologists in their "Operation Snow White". Eleven high-level Scientologists were convicted. Kendrick L. Moxon was named as an unindicted co-conspirator and he submitted fake handwriting samples in response to a Grand Jury subpoena, yet he is still working today as Scientology's lead in-house attorney.

There are two sides to Scientology, you see. There is the rank-and-file public Scientologist who just does a few courses ocassionally, then there is the staff and Sea Org who are deeper in. The Office of Special Affairs is the division responsible for public relations as well as the black ops - the modern day equivalent of Operation Snow White and Operation Freakout. I think they are more careful nowadays, and not as quick to engage in illegal activities. But they come close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think her story is far-fetched? In the 70s there was a case that was simply shocking. The &#8220;Church&#8221; of Scientology went after an author who had written a critical book about them, they actually tried to frame her for making bomb threats, threats they actually made themselves. She was completely exonerated when the FBI raided Scientology offices and seized documents, including documents detailing &#8220;Operation Freakout&#8221; - Scientology&#8217;s codename for the ghastly operation.</p>
<p>The FBI raids were actually for a different reason - the largest domestic infiltration of the US Government in history was carried out by Scientologists in their &#8220;Operation Snow White&#8221;. Eleven high-level Scientologists were convicted. Kendrick L. Moxon was named as an unindicted co-conspirator and he submitted fake handwriting samples in response to a Grand Jury subpoena, yet he is still working today as Scientology&#8217;s lead in-house attorney.</p>
<p>There are two sides to Scientology, you see. There is the rank-and-file public Scientologist who just does a few courses ocassionally, then there is the staff and Sea Org who are deeper in. The Office of Special Affairs is the division responsible for public relations as well as the black ops - the modern day equivalent of Operation Snow White and Operation Freakout. I think they are more careful nowadays, and not as quick to engage in illegal activities. But they come close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; TWIM: Scientology, the NFL and other threats to our existence</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-37972</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; TWIM: Scientology, the NFL and other threats to our existence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-37972</guid>
		<description>[...] group. Though she&#8217;s unnamed, you&#8217;ll recognize her as the same young woman I made fun of talked about earlier when a video was posted on YouTube in which she said Scientology conspired to get her fired from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] group. Though she&#8217;s unnamed, you&#8217;ll recognize her as the same young woman I made fun of talked about earlier when a video was posted on YouTube in which she said Scientology conspired to get her fired from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenubarb</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-37968</link>
		<dc:creator>xenubarb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-37968</guid>
		<description>I can assure you that fair game does exist. I have been protesting Scientology for a decade, and have my share of horror stories. Parents stalked. Friends followed.
I've been accused of domestic terrorism, drug sales and vandalism, resulting in police coming to my door.

You want to talk to someone about fair game? Drop me a line. Although I am in sunny California, this is a world wide issue. This kind of thing has happened to Scientology critics worldwide, and continues to this day.

This day, Aug. 16, Anonymous returns to the streets for another global picket.
We will be handing out information, dancing, and enjoying cake.

Expect us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can assure you that fair game does exist. I have been protesting Scientology for a decade, and have my share of horror stories. Parents stalked. Friends followed.<br />
I&#8217;ve been accused of domestic terrorism, drug sales and vandalism, resulting in police coming to my door.</p>
<p>You want to talk to someone about fair game? Drop me a line. Although I am in sunny California, this is a world wide issue. This kind of thing has happened to Scientology critics worldwide, and continues to this day.</p>
<p>This day, Aug. 16, Anonymous returns to the streets for another global picket.<br />
We will be handing out information, dancing, and enjoying cake.</p>
<p>Expect us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montreal Gazette - Campaign of harassment or just a wild imagination? - Enturbulation.org &#124; Scientology Critic &#38; Activism Forum</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-37965</link>
		<dc:creator>Montreal Gazette - Campaign of harassment or just a wild imagination? - Enturbulation.org &#124; Scientology Critic &#38; Activism Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-37965</guid>
		<description>[...]  Also check out his blog and comment board, but don't make fun of his name, only he can do that!  Blog: Fagstein Fair Game  Want to give them your opinion? globalnews.que@globaltv.com letters@thegazette.canwest.com    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Also check out his blog and comment board, but don&#8217;t make fun of his name, only he can do that!  Blog: Fagstein Fair Game  Want to give them your opinion? <a href="mailto:globalnews.que@globaltv.com">globalnews.que@globaltv.com</a> <a href="mailto:letters@thegazette.canwest.com">letters@thegazette.canwest.com</a>    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius Baltar</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-36174</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius Baltar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-36174</guid>
		<description>Well I'm posting here a little late.
I know Anonymiss (somewhat) and could've gotten you in contact with her. but it seems that I have been beaten to that.

An intresting thing about $cientology in Canada though.
It actually does not have a Religious status here, nor does it meet the legal requirements to get one. Though it has somehow aquired a sort of charitable status along with a special religious status that differs from others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m posting here a little late.<br />
I know Anonymiss (somewhat) and could&#8217;ve gotten you in contact with her. but it seems that I have been beaten to that.</p>
<p>An intresting thing about $cientology in Canada though.<br />
It actually does not have a Religious status here, nor does it meet the legal requirements to get one. Though it has somehow aquired a sort of charitable status along with a special religious status that differs from others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35965</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35965</guid>
		<description>If you can't make fun of people names, their sexuality or their intelligence what's left to make fun of?  They already took away making fun of their race and disabilities, what's left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t make fun of people names, their sexuality or their intelligence what&#8217;s left to make fun of?  They already took away making fun of their race and disabilities, what&#8217;s left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mart</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35960</link>
		<dc:creator>mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35960</guid>
		<description>Kirtaner - I am not denying that Scientology leadership has developed some serious anti-democratic and demogogic trends and has likely done more harm than good to society.  However some people that have taken up the anti-Scientology and Anonymous banners seem to be as hard-headed.  

Keep to the facts, there is no reason to question people's intelligence, make fun of their names or sexuality.  You aren't going to win much support like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirtaner - I am not denying that Scientology leadership has developed some serious anti-democratic and demogogic trends and has likely done more harm than good to society.  However some people that have taken up the anti-Scientology and Anonymous banners seem to be as hard-headed.  </p>
<p>Keep to the facts, there is no reason to question people&#8217;s intelligence, make fun of their names or sexuality.  You aren&#8217;t going to win much support like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirtaner</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35894</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirtaner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35894</guid>
		<description>Mart I suggest you view the facts for yourself before suggesting that our statements are without merit. Quite ignorant of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mart I suggest you view the facts for yourself before suggesting that our statements are without merit. Quite ignorant of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mart</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35826</link>
		<dc:creator>mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35826</guid>
		<description>It should not surprise anyone that bloging about fringe cults will bring out more loonies (and viewers) than hard-hitting stories on  ice cream kiosks or street fairs.  Calling your blog "Fagstein" instead of maybe "BlogStein" or "Frustrated Copywriter Blog" may be further exacerbating the minds of your scatelogical spewing critics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should not surprise anyone that bloging about fringe cults will bring out more loonies (and viewers) than hard-hitting stories on  ice cream kiosks or street fairs.  Calling your blog &#8220;Fagstein&#8221; instead of maybe &#8220;BlogStein&#8221; or &#8220;Frustrated Copywriter Blog&#8221; may be further exacerbating the minds of your scatelogical spewing critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickAstley</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35694</link>
		<dc:creator>RickAstley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35694</guid>
		<description>The cult of scientology also strongly opposes homosexuality and the rights of the LGTB community. The founder of scientology L Ron Hubbard himself is on record saying that homosexuality is a disease that must be cured by scientologists. 

Hubbard is also on record for racist statements such as "The problem with China, see, is there is too many chinks" further comments include that all people of African-American decent belong in cotton fields. 

Fagstein please do some research and uncover the truth about this vicious cult. Read the countless stories about critics being harassed tormented and sued just to intimidate them. Read about how scientology lead the largest infiltration of the Canadian and USA governments. (Operation Snow-White, wikipedia, other sources)

xenutv.com exscientologykids.org enturbulation.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cult of scientology also strongly opposes homosexuality and the rights of the LGTB community. The founder of scientology L Ron Hubbard himself is on record saying that homosexuality is a disease that must be cured by scientologists. </p>
<p>Hubbard is also on record for racist statements such as &#8220;The problem with China, see, is there is too many chinks&#8221; further comments include that all people of African-American decent belong in cotton fields. </p>
<p>Fagstein please do some research and uncover the truth about this vicious cult. Read the countless stories about critics being harassed tormented and sued just to intimidate them. Read about how scientology lead the largest infiltration of the Canadian and USA governments. (Operation Snow-White, wikipedia, other sources)</p>
<p>xenutv.com exscientologykids.org enturbulation.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mart</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35692</link>
		<dc:creator>mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35692</guid>
		<description>The Church would be well advised to save their energies and just lay low.  They may scare off a few critics with this type of tactic, but these young &#38; righteous internet activists will only be encouraged by their attention.  It must be an isolated local case. I can't believe that the Church's central organization is still encouraging this type of behaviour. It only further undermines their cause and opens them to even more criticism and attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Church would be well advised to save their energies and just lay low.  They may scare off a few critics with this type of tactic, but these young &amp; righteous internet activists will only be encouraged by their attention.  It must be an isolated local case. I can&#8217;t believe that the Church&#8217;s central organization is still encouraging this type of behaviour. It only further undermines their cause and opens them to even more criticism and attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sooper Nosetril</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/14/scientology-fair-game-video/#comment-35688</link>
		<dc:creator>Sooper Nosetril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2022#comment-35688</guid>
		<description>Oh come on, just use a search engine peoples!  Try searching for "fair game", you'll find several extensive write ups on it.  If you don't like that, try searching for Paulette Cooper, or Operation Snow White.  

You'll feel a little silly after you do.  Fair game is unfair, and it HURTS people.  But, that's their "religion".  It simply causes damage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on, just use a search engine peoples!  Try searching for &#8220;fair game&#8221;, you&#8217;ll find several extensive write ups on it.  If you don&#8217;t like that, try searching for Paulette Cooper, or Operation Snow White.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll feel a little silly after you do.  Fair game is unfair, and it HURTS people.  But, that&#8217;s their &#8220;religion&#8221;.  It simply causes damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
