Comments on: Olympics’ assault on fair use http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/08/18/olympics-assault-on-fair-use/ Can you think of a better name? Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Fagstein http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/08/18/olympics-assault-on-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-38317 Fagstein Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:08:20 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2403#comment-38317 I might understand a bit if the networks were holding off until tape-delayed broadcasts could occur. But in many cases it's reports that aired <em>after</em> the events appeared on television. All the stuff about Michael Phelps were reported using still photos almost a full day after NBC carried the races live. I might understand a bit if the networks were holding off until tape-delayed broadcasts could occur.

But in many cases it's reports that aired after the events appeared on television. All the stuff about Michael Phelps were reported using still photos almost a full day after NBC carried the races live.

]]> By: Josh http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/08/18/olympics-assault-on-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-38311 Josh Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:26:03 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2403#comment-38311 <i>even NBC’s controversial time-shifting of “live” broadcasts.</i> Actually, I'd say it has everything to do with NBC's wonky scheduling when it comes to the Olympics. If I'm NBC, and CBS is allowed to air footage from the men's 100 metres that shows Usain Bolt dominating the field before my network can air it in prime time - well, remind me why I'm paying all this money for the rights again? <i>The networks, including the U.S. ones like ABC and CBS, have tucked their tails between their legs and accepted these draconian rules. Instead, they awkwardly fudge their reports with still photos, file footage of practices or earlier events, or post-event press conferences.</i> If those networks have any designs on securing the Olympic broadcast rights ever again, they will continue to play ball with the IOC. It is simply *not* going to be a major television network that ever makes this stop. even NBC’s controversial time-shifting of “live” broadcasts.

Actually, I'd say it has everything to do with NBC's wonky scheduling when it comes to the Olympics. If I'm NBC, and CBS is allowed to air footage from the men's 100 metres that shows Usain Bolt dominating the field before my network can air it in prime time - well, remind me why I'm paying all this money for the rights again?

The networks, including the U.S. ones like ABC and CBS, have tucked their tails between their legs and accepted these draconian rules. Instead, they awkwardly fudge their reports with still photos, file footage of practices or earlier events, or post-event press conferences.

If those networks have any designs on securing the Olympic broadcast rights ever again, they will continue to play ball with the IOC. It is simply *not* going to be a major television network that ever makes this stop.

]]> By: Marc http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/08/18/olympics-assault-on-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-38119 Marc Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:55:00 +0000 http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2403#comment-38119 The problem is squarely with the IOC. They have got the greatest con job in history. They make multi-billions each Olympics and they don't really have to do anything to earn it. They buy the medals, some flowers, maybe some meals. But they certainly don't pay for the broadcasters, for the athletes, for the venues, for the merchandise and on and on. What do they do with this money? They line their pockets with it. They're so tight-assed that even usng the word "Olympic" is an infringement of copyright. Unless, of course, you've paid the IOC a ton of money to use it. The Olympics have lost whatever relevance they had. The problem is squarely with the IOC. They have got the greatest con job in history. They make multi-billions each Olympics and they don't really have to do anything to earn it. They buy the medals, some flowers, maybe some meals. But they certainly don't pay for the broadcasters, for the athletes, for the venues, for the merchandise and on and on. What do they do with this money? They line their pockets with it. They're so tight-assed that even usng the word "Olympic" is an infringement of copyright. Unless, of course, you've paid the IOC a ton of money to use it. The Olympics have lost whatever relevance they had.

]]>