<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analog TV shutdown is a mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:12:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-114458</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-114458</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised there&#039;s been no comments on CTV Montreal going &quot;HD!!!&quot;.

But only on CABLE.........

I find it ironic that CTV Montreal chose one of the &quot;evil cable companies&quot; 
for their first digital venture, while flipping the bird to people who watch
via antenna.  

You can probably attribute this decision to the &quot;low-hanging-fruit&quot; method,
but IMHO, if you&#039;re a feudin&#039; with someone, you don&#039;t smooch their butt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised there's been no comments on CTV Montreal going "HD!!!".</p>
<p>But only on CABLE.........</p>
<p>I find it ironic that CTV Montreal chose one of the "evil cable companies"<br />
for their first digital venture, while flipping the bird to people who watch<br />
via antenna.  </p>
<p>You can probably attribute this decision to the "low-hanging-fruit" method,<br />
but IMHO, if you're a feudin' with someone, you don't smooch their butt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBC fee-for-carriage solution isn&#8217;t really one &#8211; Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-101223</link>
		<dc:creator>CBC fee-for-carriage solution isn&#8217;t really one &#8211; Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-101223</guid>
		<description>[...] already argued that this digital transition is completely unnecessary, and that goes double for remote areas with few television stations. But the CRTC is going ahead [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already argued that this digital transition is completely unnecessary, and that goes double for remote areas with few television stations. But the CRTC is going ahead [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OScar</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-94544</link>
		<dc:creator>OScar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-94544</guid>
		<description>I live near downtown Toronto and most of the GTA digital signals are good, except that I do get bad reception occasionally in the Evening and weekends.  I do not get CITS &amp; CBLFT (no loss really).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live near downtown Toronto and most of the GTA digital signals are good, except that I do get bad reception occasionally in the Evening and weekends.  I do not get CITS &amp; CBLFT (no loss really).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-75891</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-75891</guid>
		<description>Can we go back to black and white TV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we go back to black and white TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-62265</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-62265</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see what the number of stations has to with digital TV.  We can still have less channels and use even less bandwidth if you reduced the number of channels to 40  using digital.  Digital TV works and looks better on a digital TV, so maybe flat screen TV are also a mistake.  On a 52&quot; TV 480p looks 10 time better than the analog channel .

I live in southern Ontario and could only get a couple of clear channels and a bunch of snowy ones.  now I get them all crystal clear and couple more.  One post above mentions the cliff effect.  You get a perfect picture with a bad or great signal or not at all once the signal is to weak.  That’s something to rave about not complain about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see what the number of stations has to with digital TV.  We can still have less channels and use even less bandwidth if you reduced the number of channels to 40  using digital.  Digital TV works and looks better on a digital TV, so maybe flat screen TV are also a mistake.  On a 52" TV 480p looks 10 time better than the analog channel .</p>
<p>I live in southern Ontario and could only get a couple of clear channels and a bunch of snowy ones.  now I get them all crystal clear and couple more.  One post above mentions the cliff effect.  You get a perfect picture with a bad or great signal or not at all once the signal is to weak.  That’s something to rave about not complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve81</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-58148</link>
		<dc:creator>steve81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-58148</guid>
		<description>Most stations in the Toronto area are available digitally over the air (OTA).
Not so for Montreal:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_television_in_Canada#Deployment

For people that have an HDTV with an ATSC tuner, digital OTA is great. No need to pay for cable if all you need is the basic channels. In Montreal, you can only get Radio-Canada, CBC and TQS... if you are lucky. Unless it changed recently, Radio-Canada/CBC digital are broadcast from the antenna on top of the CBC tower, so if you&#039;re on the other side of Mount Royal, you can&#039;t get it. TQS digital transmission in Montreal is also weak as well and they plan to change that with the 2011 switch.

Some people in Montreal have hooked up big roof antennas in order to get digital TV from Burlington/Plattsburgh:
http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95756
Works for some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most stations in the Toronto area are available digitally over the air (OTA).<br />
Not so for Montreal:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_television_in_Canada#Deployment" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_television_in_Canada#Deployment</a></p>
<p>For people that have an HDTV with an ATSC tuner, digital OTA is great. No need to pay for cable if all you need is the basic channels. In Montreal, you can only get Radio-Canada, CBC and TQS... if you are lucky. Unless it changed recently, Radio-Canada/CBC digital are broadcast from the antenna on top of the CBC tower, so if you're on the other side of Mount Royal, you can't get it. TQS digital transmission in Montreal is also weak as well and they plan to change that with the 2011 switch.</p>
<p>Some people in Montreal have hooked up big roof antennas in order to get digital TV from Burlington/Plattsburgh:<br />
<a href="http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95756" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95756</a><br />
Works for some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-58006</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-58006</guid>
		<description>Cable isn&#039;t affected by any of this. Nothing will change there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable isn't affected by any of this. Nothing will change there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mart</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57998</link>
		<dc:creator>mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57998</guid>
		<description>We have basic free cable package that Vide@tron forgot to cut when previous tenants moved out 5 years ago. Is our adapter going to obsolete in 2011?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have basic free cable package that Vide@tron forgot to cut when previous tenants moved out 5 years ago. Is our adapter going to obsolete in 2011?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The End of Analog TV &#8212; Super Bon!</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57986</link>
		<dc:creator>The End of Analog TV &#8212; Super Bon!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57986</guid>
		<description>[...] Fagstein has an excellent post on the end of analog TV signals in the US, and the same fate that will fall upon Canadians in 2011. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fagstein has an excellent post on the end of analog TV signals in the US, and the same fate that will fall upon Canadians in 2011. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_the_Bear</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57984</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill_the_Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57984</guid>
		<description>I used to have one of those wall charts, but I can&#039;t remember where I bought it.  I&#039;d suggest asking at a bookstore which sells federal government publications/maps, such as the one on the east side of University just above René-Lévesque, across from PVM.  You could also drop a line to Industry Canada; maybe they sell them by mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have one of those wall charts, but I can't remember where I bought it.  I'd suggest asking at a bookstore which sells federal government publications/maps, such as the one on the east side of University just above René-Lévesque, across from PVM.  You could also drop a line to Industry Canada; maybe they sell them by mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57947</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57947</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen them, though I don&#039;t own one right now. I&#039;m not sure where you can get one, though you might be able to get some large poster printer to make one from the PDF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've seen them, though I don't own one right now. I'm not sure where you can get one, though you might be able to get some large poster printer to make one from the PDF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57920</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57920</guid>
		<description>Do you actually have a physical wall chart of the spectrum allocation table?  Where did you get it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you actually have a physical wall chart of the spectrum allocation table?  Where did you get it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57915</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57915</guid>
		<description>Digital television&#039;s error-correction will resist minor signal degradation better than analog television, and the government would have you believe that whatever you can receive now will still be viewable under digital TV.

The big problem though is the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliff_effect&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cliff effect&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, where the signal degrades enough that the digital receiver can&#039;t make heads or tails out of it anymore. Stations that you receive snowy might not pass this threshold and would be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital television's error-correction will resist minor signal degradation better than analog television, and the government would have you believe that whatever you can receive now will still be viewable under digital TV.</p>
<p>The big problem though is the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliff_effect" rel="nofollow">cliff effect</a>", where the signal degrades enough that the digital receiver can't make heads or tails out of it anymore. Stations that you receive snowy might not pass this threshold and would be lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57905</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57905</guid>
		<description>Great post but one small point: digital signals will still be terrestrial broadcast, so it&#039;s not the END of broadcast TV, just analog TV.  Extra special thanks for the Canadian spectrum map.  I&#039;d been wanting one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post but one small point: digital signals will still be terrestrial broadcast, so it's not the END of broadcast TV, just analog TV.  Extra special thanks for the Canadian spectrum map.  I'd been wanting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladyjaye75</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-57901</link>
		<dc:creator>ladyjaye75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3614#comment-57901</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have cable (use good ole rabbit ears instead) and because I&#039;m near the port, I can&#039;t get any of the US channels and Rad-Can and TVA come in snowy (TQS and Télé-Qc, on the other hand, come in perfectly). I wonder one thing: can HD over-the-air signal resist interference better? i.e. If I bought a flat-screen TV tomorrow with an HD tuner, would the HD reception be easier to get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't have cable (use good ole rabbit ears instead) and because I'm near the port, I can't get any of the US channels and Rad-Can and TVA come in snowy (TQS and Télé-Qc, on the other hand, come in perfectly). I wonder one thing: can HD over-the-air signal resist interference better? i.e. If I bought a flat-screen TV tomorrow with an HD tuner, would the HD reception be easier to get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
