<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a failure; let&#8217;s double it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/14/chicago-tribune-tabloid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/14/chicago-tribune-tabloid/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/14/chicago-tribune-tabloid/comment-page-1/#comment-58649</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3668#comment-58649</guid>
		<description>Look to the UK. A couple of years ago almost all national broadsheets shifted to tabloid format, but did it in very different ways. The Independent was the first (and quite the bravest) by commencing a trial of the broadsheet and then switching over entirely in one move. The Times, perhaps propped up by the deeper pockets of News International, took longer running two concurrent formats like the Chicago Tribune. However the costs of this dual mode operation were unsustainable, and the newspaper finally shifted after much hullabaloo.

If a newspaper is committed to cutting costs and considers moving to tabloid the way forward, it should just change over. Running an expensive &quot;trial&quot; or dual-format operation just emphasises readers&#039; disapproval or approval and costs money. Eventually, even sworn broadsheet lovers like myself end up admitting it&#039;s a damn site easier to read in bed or the subway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look to the UK. A couple of years ago almost all national broadsheets shifted to tabloid format, but did it in very different ways. The Independent was the first (and quite the bravest) by commencing a trial of the broadsheet and then switching over entirely in one move. The Times, perhaps propped up by the deeper pockets of News International, took longer running two concurrent formats like the Chicago Tribune. However the costs of this dual mode operation were unsustainable, and the newspaper finally shifted after much hullabaloo.</p>
<p>If a newspaper is committed to cutting costs and considers moving to tabloid the way forward, it should just change over. Running an expensive "trial" or dual-format operation just emphasises readers' disapproval or approval and costs money. Eventually, even sworn broadsheet lovers like myself end up admitting it's a damn site easier to read in bed or the subway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/14/chicago-tribune-tabloid/comment-page-1/#comment-58578</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3668#comment-58578</guid>
		<description>Why can’t I stand reading a broadsheet (it’s impractical, and I still can’t fathom how west-islanders are able to fold and refold the papers they read on the commuter train) while I won’t be caught dead reading a tabloïd????

Now, a newspaper has managed to combine both peeves of mine!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can’t I stand reading a broadsheet (it’s impractical, and I still can’t fathom how west-islanders are able to fold and refold the papers they read on the commuter train) while I won’t be caught dead reading a tabloïd????</p>
<p>Now, a newspaper has managed to combine both peeves of mine!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam hartung</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/14/chicago-tribune-tabloid/comment-page-1/#comment-58509</link>
		<dc:creator>adam hartung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3668#comment-58509</guid>
		<description>Sam Zell refused to accept that the internet had changed competition.  Now readers can get more news faster and cheaper on the web - and Tribune Corporation has simply ignored the shift.  Lowering paper cost will not save the Chicago Tribune and LA Times.  It will take a new leader, and a new strategy.  Likewise, making employees work for free is no solution for the market shifts making USAToday and Gannett less viable.  Read more at http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Zell refused to accept that the internet had changed competition.  Now readers can get more news faster and cheaper on the web - and Tribune Corporation has simply ignored the shift.  Lowering paper cost will not save the Chicago Tribune and LA Times.  It will take a new leader, and a new strategy.  Likewise, making employees work for free is no solution for the market shifts making USAToday and Gannett less viable.  Read more at <a href="http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Burden</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/14/chicago-tribune-tabloid/comment-page-1/#comment-58402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Burden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=3668#comment-58402</guid>
		<description>Where is Chicagoland? I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s a mob and tommy-gun themed fun park in south Florida.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Chicagoland? I'm thinking it's a mob and tommy-gun themed fun park in south Florida.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

