<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad placement is everything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64779</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64779</guid>
		<description>Usually editorial and advertising are managed separately. The only people who see both together are the prepress people who combine the two and the press workers who put the plates on the presses. They concern themselves with technical aspects of the page, not whether the two might look awkward together.

It&#039;s a design flaw of the system which is designed to protect editorial from advertising and vice-versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually editorial and advertising are managed separately. The only people who see both together are the prepress people who combine the two and the press workers who put the plates on the presses. They concern themselves with technical aspects of the page, not whether the two might look awkward together.</p>
<p>It's a design flaw of the system which is designed to protect editorial from advertising and vice-versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64736</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not too familiar with the process of designing a newspaper, but I would expect that someone would look everything over before it&#039;s sent to the presses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not too familiar with the process of designing a newspaper, but I would expect that someone would look everything over before it's sent to the presses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVE ID</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64463</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVE ID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64463</guid>
		<description>Dude, when people buy ad-space in a paper they buy a specific page AND areas. And the lower-right corner of a paper is the most expensive because it&#039;s the first place the eyes look. They start from the lower-right and then pan to the upper-left corner before the reader begins scanning article titles, making the upper-left corner another expensive ad-space. The paper doesn&#039;t decide to just squeeze an add in there arbitrarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, when people buy ad-space in a paper they buy a specific page AND areas. And the lower-right corner of a paper is the most expensive because it's the first place the eyes look. They start from the lower-right and then pan to the upper-left corner before the reader begins scanning article titles, making the upper-left corner another expensive ad-space. The paper doesn't decide to just squeeze an add in there arbitrarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64439</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64439</guid>
		<description>Who? And if (as is probably the case) it was unintended, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who? And if (as is probably the case) it was unintended, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64395</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64395</guid>
		<description>Somebody needs to get fired over this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody needs to get fired over this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64357</guid>
		<description>It is even funnier because, unlike with online ads which scan the page upon which they appear to select “proper” ads on it (you can breathe now), there is no artificial silicon intelligence to blame for the misstep, only good old natural human stupidity…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is even funnier because, unlike with online ads which scan the page upon which they appear to select “proper” ads on it (you can breathe now), there is no artificial silicon intelligence to blame for the misstep, only good old natural human stupidity…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVE ID</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/23/daily-mirror-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64356</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVE ID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4264#comment-64356</guid>
		<description>LOL :D Could only have been worse had been an had for wife-beater shirts. 

But I&#039;d like to point out that In May, 2007, researchers with the Centers for Disease Control reported on rates of self-reported violence among intimate partners using data from a 2001 study.  Women reported committing one-sided attacks more than twice as often as men (70% versus 29%). (http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/15/31-a) Sadly that&#039;s rarely reported on. Granted men&#039;s attacks on women are often more injurious but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL :D Could only have been worse had been an had for wife-beater shirts. </p>
<p>But I'd like to point out that In May, 2007, researchers with the Centers for Disease Control reported on rates of self-reported violence among intimate partners using data from a 2001 study.  Women reported committing one-sided attacks more than twice as often as men (70% versus 29%). (<a href="http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/15/31-a" rel="nofollow">http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/15/31-a</a>) Sadly that's rarely reported on. Granted men's attacks on women are often more injurious but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

