<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gazette was (mostly) fair with Bouchard-Taylor scoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/03/17/gazette-bouchard-taylor-press-council-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/03/17/gazette-bouchard-taylor-press-council-ruling/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein &#187; Quebec Press Council roundup</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/03/17/gazette-bouchard-taylor-press-council-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-68412</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein &#187; Quebec Press Council roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4697#comment-68412</guid>
		<description>[...] new round of decisions from the Quebec Press Council has been posted to its website. In addition to the Gazette case I mentioned earlier, and other dismissals, were some slaps on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new round of decisions from the Quebec Press Council has been posted to its website. In addition to the Gazette case I mentioned earlier, and other dismissals, were some slaps on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/03/17/gazette-bouchard-taylor-press-council-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-68294</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4697#comment-68294</guid>
		<description>Misleading, perhaps. Cherry-picking, sure. But not wrong. That&#039;s what the judgment said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Misleading, perhaps. Cherry-picking, sure. But not wrong. That's what the judgment said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/03/17/gazette-bouchard-taylor-press-council-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-68288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4697#comment-68288</guid>
		<description>Excerpt from the judgment:
&quot;La manchette du quotidien The Gazette était libellée comme suit :

Bouchard-Taylor
Vision for a new Quebec
Final draft of the reasonable accommodation commission’s report says the responsibility for open mindedness lies mainly with French-Canadians. Its message:
Learn more English. Be nicer to Muslims. Get better informed.

Ces éléments du rapport Bouchard-Taylor se retrouvent dans le premier paragraphe de l’article intitulé : « Time for Quebecers to be more open: report » et dans la manchette centrale à la une.

Après examen par le Conseil, il s’avère que, tout en étant présents dans le contenu du rapport Bouchard-Taylor, ces trois points du « message » retenus par le journal ne correspondent pas à la pensée centrale et aux conclusions finales formulées par les commissaires Bouchard et Taylor dans leur rapport.&quot;

The article was misleading, and the title and lead were blatant examples of why a franco can&#039;t read The Gazette. Except if they are masochists. And you dare ask for excuses. Fagstein, t&#039;es de mauvaise foi. But again, qui mord la main qui le nourrit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excerpt from the judgment:<br />
"La manchette du quotidien The Gazette était libellée comme suit :</p>
<p>Bouchard-Taylor<br />
Vision for a new Quebec<br />
Final draft of the reasonable accommodation commission’s report says the responsibility for open mindedness lies mainly with French-Canadians. Its message:<br />
Learn more English. Be nicer to Muslims. Get better informed.</p>
<p>Ces éléments du rapport Bouchard-Taylor se retrouvent dans le premier paragraphe de l’article intitulé : « Time for Quebecers to be more open: report » et dans la manchette centrale à la une.</p>
<p>Après examen par le Conseil, il s’avère que, tout en étant présents dans le contenu du rapport Bouchard-Taylor, ces trois points du « message » retenus par le journal ne correspondent pas à la pensée centrale et aux conclusions finales formulées par les commissaires Bouchard et Taylor dans leur rapport."</p>
<p>The article was misleading, and the title and lead were blatant examples of why a franco can't read The Gazette. Except if they are masochists. And you dare ask for excuses. Fagstein, t'es de mauvaise foi. But again, qui mord la main qui le nourrit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

