<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CRTC Roundup: Videotron must closed-caption porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/28/crtc-roundup-videotron-must-closed-caption-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/28/crtc-roundup-videotron-must-closed-caption-porn/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/28/crtc-roundup-videotron-must-closed-caption-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-79360</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5620#comment-79360</guid>
		<description>The CBSC&#039;s point is that viewers can&#039;t be expected to assume that these comments aren&#039;t serious unless the context is made clear. It wasn&#039;t made clear in this case, because Bye Bye wanted to shock its viewers instead of making social commentary or getting laughs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBSC's point is that viewers can't be expected to assume that these comments aren't serious unless the context is made clear. It wasn't made clear in this case, because Bye Bye wanted to shock its viewers instead of making social commentary or getting laughs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/28/crtc-roundup-videotron-must-closed-caption-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-79334</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5620#comment-79334</guid>
		<description>wrong about the Bye-Bye. if people are too stupid to not see the irony, or that the abuse was directed at Denis Lévesque, racism, and the Roy family, you can&#039;t fault the Bye-Bye. they&#039;re not the ones who raised these people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrong about the Bye-Bye. if people are too stupid to not see the irony, or that the abuse was directed at Denis Lévesque, racism, and the Roy family, you can't fault the Bye-Bye. they're not the ones who raised these people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/28/crtc-roundup-videotron-must-closed-caption-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-79328</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5620#comment-79328</guid>
		<description>Dude, you’re missing not just the facts (porn is already captioned in Canada) but an amusing glimpse at CRTC paranoia: The “individual” who filed the intervention in the Vidéotron case is me. They just refuse to admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, you’re missing not just the facts (porn is already captioned in Canada) but an amusing glimpse at CRTC paranoia: The “individual” who filed the intervention in the Vidéotron case is me. They just refuse to admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/28/crtc-roundup-videotron-must-closed-caption-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-79316</link>
		<dc:creator>Horonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5620#comment-79316</guid>
		<description>Amazing how all the private broadcastersa want to show less Canadian programming and deviate from their license requirement on specialty and conventional channels with little of no impact or attention.

The CBC deviates with Bold and the CRTC is on them. 

The CBC should set an example not be an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how all the private broadcastersa want to show less Canadian programming and deviate from their license requirement on specialty and conventional channels with little of no impact or attention.</p>
<p>The CBC deviates with Bold and the CRTC is on them. </p>
<p>The CBC should set an example not be an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

