<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enviro pop quiz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Gatti</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-86566</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Gatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6248#comment-86566</guid>
		<description>I knew it would be a wealthy suburb, though I&#039;d thought perhaps Côte-St-Luc. 

This is funny, as while there is no excusing St-Léonard&#039;s poor performance, Senneville households have a far larger environmental footprint, living in huge houses with huge lawns, consuming more stuff simply because they have money (even allowing that affluent people can afford better-quality, more-durable stuff) and above all doing everything they can to keep out public transport, and pollute the rest of us commuting one in a usually-large car. 

There is everything in St-Léonard from single-family houses to apartment tower blocks, but a lot of it is duplexes with a granny flat, a much more sustainable urban form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew it would be a wealthy suburb, though I'd thought perhaps Côte-St-Luc. </p>
<p>This is funny, as while there is no excusing St-Léonard's poor performance, Senneville households have a far larger environmental footprint, living in huge houses with huge lawns, consuming more stuff simply because they have money (even allowing that affluent people can afford better-quality, more-durable stuff) and above all doing everything they can to keep out public transport, and pollute the rest of us commuting one in a usually-large car. </p>
<p>There is everything in St-Léonard from single-family houses to apartment tower blocks, but a lot of it is duplexes with a granny flat, a much more sustainable urban form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-86534</link>
		<dc:creator>cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6248#comment-86534</guid>
		<description>Most  Senneville
Least Downtown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most  Senneville<br />
Least Downtown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumitru Erhan</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-86532</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumitru Erhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6248#comment-86532</guid>
		<description>You mean the entire borough or per capita?

If it&#039;s the latter, I&#039;d say

most: Plateau or Outremont
least: Montreal-Nord?

If the former... hmm, I guess it&#039;s very much correlated with the population size :) So most: Rosemont or CDN/NDG and least: Senneville or Ile-Dorval :)

But it could also be that in a small place like Senneville everyone recycles so their per capita rate would be pretty high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean the entire borough or per capita?</p>
<p>If it's the latter, I'd say</p>
<p>most: Plateau or Outremont<br />
least: Montreal-Nord?</p>
<p>If the former... hmm, I guess it's very much correlated with the population size :) So most: Rosemont or CDN/NDG and least: Senneville or Ile-Dorval :)</p>
<p>But it could also be that in a small place like Senneville everyone recycles so their per capita rate would be pretty high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allisonshine</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-86516</link>
		<dc:creator>allisonshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6248#comment-86516</guid>
		<description>most? Pointe-Claire.
least? downtown Montreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most? Pointe-Claire.<br />
least? downtown Montreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF Villeneuve</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/14/enviro-pop-quiz/comment-page-1/#comment-86503</link>
		<dc:creator>JF Villeneuve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6248#comment-86503</guid>
		<description>My guesses:

the most? Plateau or CDN-NDG?
The least? Île Dorval :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guesses:</p>
<p>the most? Plateau or CDN-NDG?<br />
The least? Île Dorval :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

