<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Me: The New New Democratic Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arron</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-246766</link>
		<dc:creator>Arron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-246766</guid>
		<description>Why is it that a party that has no interest in democracy, thinks it&#039;s a good idea to call itself the Democratic Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that a party that has no interest in democracy, thinks it's a good idea to call itself the Democratic Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-90061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-90061</guid>
		<description>That would actually depend whether you are one of the penetrators or the penetratee…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would actually depend whether you are one of the penetrators or the penetratee…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-90059</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-90059</guid>
		<description>Er, no. The Canadian Reform Alliance Party (let’s call it for what it really is) is **NOT** the tories of yesterday; they have bought it outright just to reuse the name (and scrap everything else) in order to fool the electorate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, no. The Canadian Reform Alliance Party (let’s call it for what it really is) is **NOT** the tories of yesterday; they have bought it outright just to reuse the name (and scrap everything else) in order to fool the electorate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-90014</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-90014</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s also in the article. It was the Canadian Conservative Reform Alliance that was proposed, and reporters discovered that adding the word &quot;party&quot; to the end created the &quot;CCRAP&quot; acronym. Tory haters began using the acronym from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's also in the article. It was the Canadian Conservative Reform Alliance that was proposed, and reporters discovered that adding the word "party" to the end created the "CCRAP" acronym. Tory haters began using the acronym from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Bélanger</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-90009</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Bélanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-90009</guid>
		<description>... reminds of the name situation during the merger of the Progressive Conservative Party and the Alliance Party. One of the proposed name was the Canadian Reform Alliance Party. 

They managed to see that the acronym would have been full of &quot;crap&quot;. It was the same convention during which their national slogan was &quot;think big&quot;. Quite a nice reference to Elvis Gratton for the Francophones out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... reminds of the name situation during the merger of the Progressive Conservative Party and the Alliance Party. One of the proposed name was the Canadian Reform Alliance Party. </p>
<p>They managed to see that the acronym would have been full of "crap". It was the same convention during which their national slogan was "think big". Quite a nice reference to Elvis Gratton for the Francophones out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-90007</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-90007</guid>
		<description>As the article mentions, there was a French party that tried the same name and quickly changed it for exactly that reason. It&#039;s unclear if the NDP is going to learn from that lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the article mentions, there was a French party that tried the same name and quickly changed it for exactly that reason. It's unclear if the NDP is going to learn from that lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-89991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-89991</guid>
		<description>P.D., in french is pronounced “pédé”, which is an abbreviation of “pédéraste”, but is simply (mis)used to designate gay men.

Way to go to increase their popularity in Québec!!!

The Bloc has a strong future ahead…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.D., in french is pronounced “pédé”, which is an abbreviation of “pédéraste”, but is simply (mis)used to designate gay men.</p>
<p>Way to go to increase their popularity in Québec!!!</p>
<p>The Bloc has a strong future ahead…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Moore</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-89972</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-89972</guid>
		<description>PD... Do they know what PD (pédé) means in French? Sooo many people are going to make fun of this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PD... Do they know what PD (pédé) means in French? Sooo many people are going to make fun of this...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFT</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-89970</link>
		<dc:creator>JFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-89970</guid>
		<description>&quot;Le parti des PD&quot;?
It doesn&#039;t sound that great in french ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Le parti des PD"?<br />
It doesn't sound that great in french ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-89960</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-89960</guid>
		<description>Someone may want to alert/remind them that in this day of easily-available pr0n via the Net, &quot;DP&quot; will never be thought of as Democratic Party ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone may want to alert/remind them that in this day of easily-available pr0n via the Net, "DP" will never be thought of as Democratic Party ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Youppi!</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/10/ndp-bluffers/comment-page-1/#comment-89959</link>
		<dc:creator>Youppi!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6486#comment-89959</guid>
		<description>All I can think of when looking at that logo is &quot;The Double Penetration Party.&quot; That would be hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can think of when looking at that logo is "The Double Penetration Party." That would be hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

