<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No bikes on Summit Circle &#8230; path</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-95305</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-95305</guid>
		<description>Actually this is to deter mountain-bikers who get a little too happy when they spot some actual genuine single track - a rarity in Montreal. Of course westmount applies full buzzkill to the problem with that favorite bureaucratic remedy to all life&#039;s problems: prohibition. Oh, and signs, they sure do love signs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this is to deter mountain-bikers who get a little too happy when they spot some actual genuine single track - a rarity in Montreal. Of course westmount applies full buzzkill to the problem with that favorite bureaucratic remedy to all life's problems: prohibition. Oh, and signs, they sure do love signs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94910</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94910</guid>
		<description>we saw them as we were leaving the car- I assumed I was in a safe neighborhood and didn&#039;t think twice about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we saw them as we were leaving the car- I assumed I was in a safe neighborhood and didn't think twice about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Dufour</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94781</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Dufour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94781</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Here is what happenned to me this summer in Mont-Royal:

http://www.cptdb.ca/index.php?showtopic=9368</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Here is what happenned to me this summer in Mont-Royal:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cptdb.ca/index.php?showtopic=9368" rel="nofollow">http://www.cptdb.ca/index.php?showtopic=9368</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94780</guid>
		<description>How do you know it was two cyclists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know it was two cyclists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zvi Leve</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94636</link>
		<dc:creator>Zvi Leve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94636</guid>
		<description>I see that you too have been contesting some tickets yourself! It certainly is true that &quot;ignorance of the law is not a defense for violating the law&quot; but there are also limits to what it is reasonable to expect a citizen to know. In my particular case, there were numerous parking signs indicating all sorts of restrictions, but the sign which indicated the hours of the street-cleaning was not on the particular sign post I was looking at. How is a reasonable person supposed to know that *one* sign is missing on that post? And similarly for the second case - if there are different parking rules in application, the original signs should be covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that you too have been contesting some tickets yourself! It certainly is true that "ignorance of the law is not a defense for violating the law" but there are also limits to what it is reasonable to expect a citizen to know. In my particular case, there were numerous parking signs indicating all sorts of restrictions, but the sign which indicated the hours of the street-cleaning was not on the particular sign post I was looking at. How is a reasonable person supposed to know that *one* sign is missing on that post? And similarly for the second case - if there are different parking rules in application, the original signs should be covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94616</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94616</guid>
		<description>At least Westmount doesn&#039;t have a &lt;del&gt;Berlin Wall&lt;/del&gt; fence where the public security questions anyone who enters via one of its six gates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Westmount doesn't have a <del>Berlin Wall</del> fence where the public security questions anyone who enters via one of its six gates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94614</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94614</guid>
		<description>(Whoops, I forgot...) The absence of french on the signs also do not invalidate the law (despite how much I love law 101). However, the absence of french on a ticket will invalidate the ticket, given the constitutional guarantee that justice must be administered in french or english.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Whoops, I forgot...) The absence of french on the signs also do not invalidate the law (despite how much I love law 101). However, the absence of french on a ticket will invalidate the ticket, given the constitutional guarantee that justice must be administered in french or english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94613</guid>
		<description>I find it quite surprising that the tickets were thrown out in court. When you get a ticket, it is in application of the Law, which sits in some official ledger somewhere in City Hall after it has been approved through the necessary legal channels. The signs by the streetside are merely a reflection of the law to inform the public what is the actual law.
However, since ignorance of the law is not a defence for violating the said law, the absence of suitable signage does not invalidates the law, which still fully applies in that case; hence the great success of speed-trap cities who hide a speed limit sign with a truck in order to ticket unsuspecting motorists. The absence of proper signage in Westmount falls under the same category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it quite surprising that the tickets were thrown out in court. When you get a ticket, it is in application of the Law, which sits in some official ledger somewhere in City Hall after it has been approved through the necessary legal channels. The signs by the streetside are merely a reflection of the law to inform the public what is the actual law.<br />
However, since ignorance of the law is not a defence for violating the said law, the absence of suitable signage does not invalidates the law, which still fully applies in that case; hence the great success of speed-trap cities who hide a speed limit sign with a truck in order to ticket unsuspecting motorists. The absence of proper signage in Westmount falls under the same category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94609</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;4) Why isn&#8217;t Justin Trudeau volunteering to be the bicycle poster boy for Montreal? We need celebs&#8230; but I guess most of them are busy cutting us off in their limos on the way to save the world from climate change. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Using Trudeau would be counter-productive. Trudeau was elected by the immigrants, not the &quot;pure laines&quot;. In fact, Trudeau is a dirty word in Qu&#233;bec; more than 25 years after he left power, Trudeau is widely despised and hated for his constitutionnal coup. You would know that if you were not utterly disconnected from Qu&#233;bec society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<em>4) Why isn&rsquo;t Justin Trudeau volunteering to be the bicycle poster boy for Montreal? We need celebs&hellip; but I guess most of them are busy cutting us off in their limos on the way to save the world from climate change. </em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Using Trudeau would be counter-productive. Trudeau was elected by the immigrants, not the &quot;pure laines&quot;. In fact, Trudeau is a dirty word in Qu&eacute;bec; more than 25 years after he left power, Trudeau is widely despised and hated for his constitutionnal coup. You would know that if you were not utterly disconnected from Qu&eacute;bec society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94608</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94608</guid>
		<description>semi-related- a few years ago, a friend&#039;s ontario-plate car was broken into at oakland and summit circle by 2 cyclists.   we both lost our purses and wallets, among other things.   The non-westmounter, opportunist thieves no doubt went down the ridgewood way, through the forest at that intersection.  

the no cyclist image on that very corner gave me a chuckle for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>semi-related- a few years ago, a friend's ontario-plate car was broken into at oakland and summit circle by 2 cyclists.   we both lost our purses and wallets, among other things.   The non-westmounter, opportunist thieves no doubt went down the ridgewood way, through the forest at that intersection.  </p>
<p>the no cyclist image on that very corner gave me a chuckle for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94548</link>
		<dc:creator>Horonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94548</guid>
		<description>Once I saw the path beside the road I thought the no bicycle sign must be for that. Although wouldn&#039;t it be safer for the cyclists to use the path so the SUV driving soccer moms wouldn&#039;t run them over? I&#039;m all for sharing the road but too many drivers think the road belongs to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once I saw the path beside the road I thought the no bicycle sign must be for that. Although wouldn't it be safer for the cyclists to use the path so the SUV driving soccer moms wouldn't run them over? I'm all for sharing the road but too many drivers think the road belongs to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMS</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94537</link>
		<dc:creator>SMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94537</guid>
		<description>Maybe a sidewalk would remove the need to post those signs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a sidewalk would remove the need to post those signs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94509</guid>
		<description>Right. Westmounters are not a hundredth times douchebaggy as Mont-Royalers... (And Montréal-Ouesters).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. Westmounters are not a hundredth times douchebaggy as Mont-Royalers... (And Montréal-Ouesters).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94508</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94508</guid>
		<description>Watch TVA run with this (no pun) and make it another anti-Westmount story.
Of course it would be in WM&#039;s interest to clarify the damn sign though coming up with a symbol to indicate &quot;no bikes on the jogging path&quot; would be a tough one. Also had you not indicated as much I would
not have known that small dirt lane was a jogging path o.O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch TVA run with this (no pun) and make it another anti-Westmount story.<br />
Of course it would be in WM's interest to clarify the damn sign though coming up with a symbol to indicate "no bikes on the jogging path" would be a tough one. Also had you not indicated as much I would<br />
not have known that small dirt lane was a jogging path o.O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red light means go</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94504</link>
		<dc:creator>red light means go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94504</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from a town where people can&#039;t figure out how to cross on the green hand (see Sherbrooke/Claremont), that put giant cement blocks in the bicycle path so that pedestrians could walk on it in Westmount Park, and that closes down the bike lane (in front of a parking garage) to facilitate street parking in the fall (Atwater/Maisonneuve)?

You might want to put your investigative journalism skills to task at the bike path at Concordia University. Does Concordia hate bicycles? I think so.

1) Why can&#039;t people figure out that it is a bike path? This should be part of the entrance exams for Concordia... Question: When standing in a bike lane what do you do? Response: Get the FECK out of it!

2) Why the heck has that area been under construction for ever and no one can come up with a system that doesn&#039;t result in people walking on the bike path? 

3) Why aren&#039;t cops standing there making mad $$$ by giving out several hundred jaywalking tickets a day? It&#039;s public safety, but I guess they prefer to go to Dairy Queen to get ice cream. 

4) Why isn&#039;t Justin Trudeau volunteering to be the bicycle poster boy for Montreal? We need celebs... but I guess most of them are busy cutting us off in their limos on the way to save the world from climate change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from a town where people can't figure out how to cross on the green hand (see Sherbrooke/Claremont), that put giant cement blocks in the bicycle path so that pedestrians could walk on it in Westmount Park, and that closes down the bike lane (in front of a parking garage) to facilitate street parking in the fall (Atwater/Maisonneuve)?</p>
<p>You might want to put your investigative journalism skills to task at the bike path at Concordia University. Does Concordia hate bicycles? I think so.</p>
<p>1) Why can't people figure out that it is a bike path? This should be part of the entrance exams for Concordia... Question: When standing in a bike lane what do you do? Response: Get the FECK out of it!</p>
<p>2) Why the heck has that area been under construction for ever and no one can come up with a system that doesn't result in people walking on the bike path? </p>
<p>3) Why aren't cops standing there making mad $$$ by giving out several hundred jaywalking tickets a day? It's public safety, but I guess they prefer to go to Dairy Queen to get ice cream. </p>
<p>4) Why isn't Justin Trudeau volunteering to be the bicycle poster boy for Montreal? We need celebs... but I guess most of them are busy cutting us off in their limos on the way to save the world from climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zvi Leve</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/comment-page-1/#comment-94503</link>
		<dc:creator>Zvi Leve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=7029#comment-94503</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, signage Westmount. A few years ago I received a number of parking tickets in Westmount due to non-standard and/or missing signage in the area. After the first ticket I actually called the city to tell them that they were missing a sign. Their response: there has not been a sign at that particular location for at least ten years now and furthermore it is my responsibility to check the signs in BOTH directions when parking a car. A week later I did check the signs in both directions and yet I got another ticket because they had placed &quot;Resident only&quot; signs (in English only) near the houses without indicating anything on the official signs!

Needless to say both tickets were thrown out of Montreal Parking court within minutes, and the judge agreed with me that their signage was completely ridiculous (I had photographic proof). As far as I know, nothing much has changed. Westmount does their own thing, and they are often very zealous in the application of the not very clear rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, signage Westmount. A few years ago I received a number of parking tickets in Westmount due to non-standard and/or missing signage in the area. After the first ticket I actually called the city to tell them that they were missing a sign. Their response: there has not been a sign at that particular location for at least ten years now and furthermore it is my responsibility to check the signs in BOTH directions when parking a car. A week later I did check the signs in both directions and yet I got another ticket because they had placed "Resident only" signs (in English only) near the houses without indicating anything on the official signs!</p>
<p>Needless to say both tickets were thrown out of Montreal Parking court within minutes, and the judge agreed with me that their signage was completely ridiculous (I had photographic proof). As far as I know, nothing much has changed. Westmount does their own thing, and they are often very zealous in the application of the not very clear rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

