<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Shop fails again at service in French</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Levine</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-165836</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-165836</guid>
		<description>Dream on Jacques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dream on Jacques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques from Laprairie</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-165610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques from Laprairie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-165610</guid>
		<description>GILLES SAYS.....

  Half a million Quebecers voted with their feet and left this province over the past 30-40 years. A once vibrant community is really not in very good shape in terms of morale and numbers.


 WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!

  Small minded people try to blame a so called post PQ election and subsequent law 101 and the exodus of supposidly english community.
  The fact is that their was a shift in the population as early as 1968 as the economy of Canada shifted towards the center of Canada in response to the opening up of western Canada. the opening of the Saint Laurence seaway also contributed. 
  Businesses did not move because of law 101 but more to centralise their locations and employees were given the opportunity to relocate.
 I`m sure that SOME whackadoo anglo french haters and french bashers moved to get away from them thar crazy frenchies and separatists but THEY are cowards and in the minority.

 the real Quebec anglophones stayed and participate in Quebec society.

Jacques</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GILLES SAYS.....</p>
<p>  Half a million Quebecers voted with their feet and left this province over the past 30-40 years. A once vibrant community is really not in very good shape in terms of morale and numbers.</p>
<p> WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!</p>
<p>  Small minded people try to blame a so called post PQ election and subsequent law 101 and the exodus of supposidly english community.<br />
  The fact is that their was a shift in the population as early as 1968 as the economy of Canada shifted towards the center of Canada in response to the opening up of western Canada. the opening of the Saint Laurence seaway also contributed.<br />
  Businesses did not move because of law 101 but more to centralise their locations and employees were given the opportunity to relocate.<br />
 I`m sure that SOME whackadoo anglo french haters and french bashers moved to get away from them thar crazy frenchies and separatists but THEY are cowards and in the minority.</p>
<p> the real Quebec anglophones stayed and participate in Quebec society.</p>
<p>Jacques</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112377</link>
		<dc:creator>mdblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112377</guid>
		<description>Jean,

Don&#039;t you think you&#039;re being a little racist?  I mean, you&#039;ve stereotyped all anglophones in Quebec as &quot;obtuse rhodesians&quot; and &quot;a bunch of spoiled brats&quot;.  You&#039;ve even gone so far as to say that the French do not believe in multiculturalism!  101 or 401?  Are you serious?  How many reasonable people do you know who offer logic only in absolute terms?  Do you really believe this, or are you trying to be dramatic?  

You should be careful with racist stereotypes.  As attractive as they are because of the simplicity they can bring to an otherwise chaotic human environment, they are dangerous because they obscure the truth.  For example, if I beleived that every single French person in Quebec had the same views as you when it comes to the anglophone community, then I would not have all of the great francophone friends and work colleagues that I lucky to have in my life.  The love I have for these people would be replaced by an all-encompassing hatred.   Hate is like a corrosive poison to the human soul.

Have you ever had a civilized conversation with an anglophone about their views of the language laws?  About how it feels to be a minority in a sea of francophones?  Have you ever asked an anglophone why they might disagree with your views?  Just to see what they said?  If you did, you might understand things a little more clearly.  For example, you might understand how ridiculous it is to say that &quot;If you want to be english, you just go to Ontario where you will be able to be as english as you want.&quot;  It&#039;s just as stupid as saying &quot;If you want to be French and have a government that protects and promotes the French language above all others, you just go to France where you can be as French as you like.&quot;  You know all tose arguments going through your head right now as to why that is a ridiculous statement?  Do you see where I&#039;m going with this...?

I am an anglo.  My mother&#039;s family came here from Lebanon in the 1890s and my father&#039;s family came from Romania in the early 20th century.   I admit that growing up in an English enclave that I had a singular view of the language protection laws (I thought they were simply insane) and of the sovereignty movement.  That was until I recognized a flaw in my thinking.  I KNEW A LOT OF FRANCOPHONES!  And what&#039;s more, they all seemed to be perfectly reasonable people! Imagine that!  Why would such kind, friendly, and sane people support such an insane project?  So I decided to ask my francophone friends about why they supported language laws and sovereignty.  After doing so and listening to their answers, I can say that although I still don&#039;t agree with language laws here in Quebec, I understand what the motivation behind them is, and why they were put in place.  I can even understand why sovreignists want to have their own country.  It seems reasonable!  Doesn&#039;t mean that I agree, but at least I can understand it.

By the way, I would love my own country too.  Filled with people who were all like me, thought like me, looked like me, had the same values, etc.  I understand where you are coming from- seriously!  Just because I disagree with your point of view doesn&#039;t make me a whiner who doesn&#039;t have enough cherries on my sundae.

Wasn&#039;t it Voltaire (a francophone incidentally) who said &quot;I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.&quot; Do you reject this type of thinking?

Anyways, I&#039;ve written too much as it is but let me sum up by saying that from what I can tell from your post that you are a xenophobic racist.  No different from any other bigot who would judge a man by the colour of his skin.  You can change however.  I am proof of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean,</p>
<p>Don't you think you're being a little racist?  I mean, you've stereotyped all anglophones in Quebec as "obtuse rhodesians" and "a bunch of spoiled brats".  You've even gone so far as to say that the French do not believe in multiculturalism!  101 or 401?  Are you serious?  How many reasonable people do you know who offer logic only in absolute terms?  Do you really believe this, or are you trying to be dramatic?  </p>
<p>You should be careful with racist stereotypes.  As attractive as they are because of the simplicity they can bring to an otherwise chaotic human environment, they are dangerous because they obscure the truth.  For example, if I beleived that every single French person in Quebec had the same views as you when it comes to the anglophone community, then I would not have all of the great francophone friends and work colleagues that I lucky to have in my life.  The love I have for these people would be replaced by an all-encompassing hatred.   Hate is like a corrosive poison to the human soul.</p>
<p>Have you ever had a civilized conversation with an anglophone about their views of the language laws?  About how it feels to be a minority in a sea of francophones?  Have you ever asked an anglophone why they might disagree with your views?  Just to see what they said?  If you did, you might understand things a little more clearly.  For example, you might understand how ridiculous it is to say that "If you want to be english, you just go to Ontario where you will be able to be as english as you want."  It's just as stupid as saying "If you want to be French and have a government that protects and promotes the French language above all others, you just go to France where you can be as French as you like."  You know all tose arguments going through your head right now as to why that is a ridiculous statement?  Do you see where I'm going with this...?</p>
<p>I am an anglo.  My mother's family came here from Lebanon in the 1890s and my father's family came from Romania in the early 20th century.   I admit that growing up in an English enclave that I had a singular view of the language protection laws (I thought they were simply insane) and of the sovereignty movement.  That was until I recognized a flaw in my thinking.  I KNEW A LOT OF FRANCOPHONES!  And what's more, they all seemed to be perfectly reasonable people! Imagine that!  Why would such kind, friendly, and sane people support such an insane project?  So I decided to ask my francophone friends about why they supported language laws and sovereignty.  After doing so and listening to their answers, I can say that although I still don't agree with language laws here in Quebec, I understand what the motivation behind them is, and why they were put in place.  I can even understand why sovreignists want to have their own country.  It seems reasonable!  Doesn't mean that I agree, but at least I can understand it.</p>
<p>By the way, I would love my own country too.  Filled with people who were all like me, thought like me, looked like me, had the same values, etc.  I understand where you are coming from- seriously!  Just because I disagree with your point of view doesn't make me a whiner who doesn't have enough cherries on my sundae.</p>
<p>Wasn't it Voltaire (a francophone incidentally) who said "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Do you reject this type of thinking?</p>
<p>Anyways, I've written too much as it is but let me sum up by saying that from what I can tell from your post that you are a xenophobic racist.  No different from any other bigot who would judge a man by the colour of his skin.  You can change however.  I am proof of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westerner</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112290</link>
		<dc:creator>Westerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112290</guid>
		<description>Heh little Johnny boy,

&quot;We are french.&quot;   You from France? or do you just speak a weak version of french. Not the same thing.

&quot;We do not believe in multiculturalism&quot;.  Really, no wonder you have problems with Montreal Nord and the immigrants.   And here all along I though Quebec was so open to other cultures.  

&quot;We believe in an unique culture.&quot;    Really, and what would that be.   &quot;Canadian who speaks french&quot;

Your such as joker little johnny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh little Johnny boy,</p>
<p>"We are french."   You from France? or do you just speak a weak version of french. Not the same thing.</p>
<p>"We do not believe in multiculturalism".  Really, no wonder you have problems with Montreal Nord and the immigrants.   And here all along I though Quebec was so open to other cultures.  </p>
<p>"We believe in an unique culture."    Really, and what would that be.   "Canadian who speaks french"</p>
<p>Your such as joker little johnny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future Shop: Fagstein, un anglophone &#224; la d&#233;fense des francophones &#171; Reflet de Société / Journal de la Rue. L&#39;actualité sociale et communautaire. Jeu compulsif, gang de rue, alcool, toxicomanie, suicide</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112285</link>
		<dc:creator>Future Shop: Fagstein, un anglophone &#224; la d&#233;fense des francophones &#171; Reflet de Société / Journal de la Rue. L&#39;actualité sociale et communautaire. Jeu compulsif, gang de rue, alcool, toxicomanie, suicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112285</guid>
		<description>[...] Pour lire le billet original de Fagstein. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pour lire le billet original de Fagstein. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112156</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112156</guid>
		<description>&quot;We do not care about minorities. We are french. &quot;

Wrong... You sir are a little man who is simply a cowardly violent little f@@@. Your claim  of representing the average Quebecer (French or of any other background) is absolute garbage. I wish you would kindly leave this forum but as I am not the admin; we all must put up with your trashy ways I guess.... Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"We do not care about minorities. We are french. "</p>
<p>Wrong... You sir are a little man who is simply a cowardly violent little f@@@. Your claim  of representing the average Quebecer (French or of any other background) is absolute garbage. I wish you would kindly leave this forum but as I am not the admin; we all must put up with your trashy ways I guess.... Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112139</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;EVERYONE needs to understand that not every language brouhaha is born of malice.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Indeed, greed has a lot to do by choosing contractors who do a cheap substandard job&#8230; And the english have been very vocal about the cost of french (and bilingualism), too&#8230;
And it so happens that to us, the english act very much like greedy bastards (they keep saying &#8220;&lt;em&gt;Qu&#233;bec does not gives a shit about the Economy, look at all their [socialist] policies!!!&lt;/em&gt;&#8221;), which does not help their image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<em>EVERYONE needs to understand that not every language brouhaha is born of malice.</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed, greed has a lot to do by choosing contractors who do a cheap substandard job&hellip; And the english have been very vocal about the cost of french (and bilingualism), too&hellip;<br />
And it so happens that to us, the english act very much like greedy bastards (they keep saying &ldquo;<em>Qu&eacute;bec does not gives a shit about the Economy, look at all their [socialist] policies!!!</em>&rdquo;), which does not help their image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112137</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;How democratic are those laws that look to silence those who do not agree to having their rights removed. How are they democratic when use of legal means to scare and intemidate those who do not agree. How democratic when the you&#039;re told to shut up in your own country!&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Kindly tell us whose persons have had their human rights removed.
Thank-you.
(Note: I am not holding my breath on this one &#8212; I fully expect an absolute non-answer on this one because there is no answer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<em>How democratic are those laws that look to silence those who do not agree to having their rights removed. How are they democratic when use of legal means to scare and intemidate those who do not agree. How democratic when the you're told to shut up in your own country!</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Kindly tell us whose persons have had their human rights removed.<br />
Thank-you.<br />
(Note: I am not holding my breath on this one &mdash; I fully expect an absolute non-answer on this one because there is no answer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112136</guid>
		<description>Chic! Des romains!
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;You fret about what you consider an inadequately thorough application of the language laws but have no opinion about the massive damage that same law has had on the province. You lack a sense of perspective to ever be a good journalist.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I am making a batch of pop-corn right now so we can be ready for when you start explaining &#8220;the massive damage that same law has had on the province&#8221;&#8230;
I just can&#8217;t wait to shoot down your &#8220;arguments&#8221;&#8230;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chic! Des romains!</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>You fret about what you consider an inadequately thorough application of the language laws but have no opinion about the massive damage that same law has had on the province. You lack a sense of perspective to ever be a good journalist.</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>I am making a batch of pop-corn right now so we can be ready for when you start explaining &ldquo;the massive damage that same law has had on the province&rdquo;&hellip;<br />
I just can&rsquo;t wait to shoot down your &ldquo;arguments&rdquo;&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112135</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Real people in Quebec do not complain about language issues. We don&#039;t care about language issues at all, except when some journalist brings something up -- in which case all we do is say &quot;shut up already, go do something useful.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
As you are complaining about language issues, I gather you are not a &#8220;real people&#8221;, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<em>Real people in Quebec do not complain about language issues. We don't care about language issues at all, except when some journalist brings something up -- in which case all we do is say &quot;shut up already, go do something useful.&quot;</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>As you are complaining about language issues, I gather you are not a &ldquo;real people&rdquo;, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112134</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;With all due respect to you; as you are a newcommer to Quebec - you may not have witnessed the decline of our historical (anglophone, allophone) community in terms of numbers the way those of us born here have. Half a million Quebecers voted with their feet and left this province over the past 30-40 years. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Boo, hoo, hoo. Cry me a river. Those people who &#8220;voted with their feet&#8221; were the most obtuse rhodesians who thought that just by being english, they were better than the french rabble. No sane society needs such people who put themselves above the majority.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A once vibrant community is really not in very good shape in terms of morale and numbers. More to the point - Anglophone communities in places like the Gaspe and Eastern Townships have been severely affected.  &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
When that &#8220;vibrant&#8221; community &#8220;vibres&#8221; at the expense of the majority, it is nothing more than a parasite. And by being 300 million strong in North America, that culture is not exactly endangered.
They have left by their own volition; no one was expelled; they left when they realized that they could not continue to dominate Qu&#233;bec like they used to do for so long.
Good riddance.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;I personally do not believe that the language laws where English is forced to be half the size of French is helpful to unity and to the image of this province. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No one cares. Really. No one cares about the &#8220;plight&#8221; of the english in Qu&#233;bec (who still have their hospitals, schools, media, etc.). No one gives a rat&#8217;s ass.
All people see is what there really is: a bunch of spoiled brats whining because they do not have enough cherries on their sund&#230;s.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Other laws with regard to schooling could be changed without any effect on the &quot;survival&quot; of French in Quebec. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There is no way in hell that immigrants shall be allowed to go to english schools. No way at all. Remember the bill 63 riots? You want that again?
&lt;blockquote&gt;
In fact, many of these laws are perceived (and I believe rightfully so) as petty and designed to send a negative message of marginalization to these minority communities.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
We do not care about minorities. We are french. We do not believe in multiculturalism. We believe in an unique culture. If you want to be english, you just go to Ontario where you will be able to be as english as you want.
It&#8217;s 101 or 401.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<em>With all due respect to you; as you are a newcommer to Quebec - you may not have witnessed the decline of our historical (anglophone, allophone) community in terms of numbers the way those of us born here have. Half a million Quebecers voted with their feet and left this province over the past 30-40 years. </em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Boo, hoo, hoo. Cry me a river. Those people who &ldquo;voted with their feet&rdquo; were the most obtuse rhodesians who thought that just by being english, they were better than the french rabble. No sane society needs such people who put themselves above the majority.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>A once vibrant community is really not in very good shape in terms of morale and numbers. More to the point - Anglophone communities in places like the Gaspe and Eastern Townships have been severely affected.  </em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>When that &ldquo;vibrant&rdquo; community &ldquo;vibres&rdquo; at the expense of the majority, it is nothing more than a parasite. And by being 300 million strong in North America, that culture is not exactly endangered.<br />
They have left by their own volition; no one was expelled; they left when they realized that they could not continue to dominate Qu&eacute;bec like they used to do for so long.<br />
Good riddance.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>I personally do not believe that the language laws where English is forced to be half the size of French is helpful to unity and to the image of this province. </em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>No one cares. Really. No one cares about the &ldquo;plight&rdquo; of the english in Qu&eacute;bec (who still have their hospitals, schools, media, etc.). No one gives a rat&rsquo;s ass.<br />
All people see is what there really is: a bunch of spoiled brats whining because they do not have enough cherries on their sund&aelig;s.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Other laws with regard to schooling could be changed without any effect on the &quot;survival&quot; of French in Quebec.
</p></blockquote>
<p>There is no way in hell that immigrants shall be allowed to go to english schools. No way at all. Remember the bill 63 riots? You want that again?</p>
<blockquote><p>
In fact, many of these laws are perceived (and I believe rightfully so) as petty and designed to send a negative message of marginalization to these minority communities.
</p></blockquote>
<p>We do not care about minorities. We are french. We do not believe in multiculturalism. We believe in an unique culture. If you want to be english, you just go to Ontario where you will be able to be as english as you want.<br />
It&rsquo;s 101 or 401.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112039</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112039</guid>
		<description>Actually I believe Kevin is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I believe Kevin is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-112002</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-112002</guid>
		<description>How democratic are those laws that look to silence those who do not agree to having their rights removed. How are they democratic when use of legal means to scare and intemidate those who do not agree. How democratic when the you&#039;re told to shut up in your own country!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How democratic are those laws that look to silence those who do not agree to having their rights removed. How are they democratic when use of legal means to scare and intemidate those who do not agree. How democratic when the you're told to shut up in your own country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111967</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111967</guid>
		<description>@Kevin, I have a real job (whatever that means) and am not a member of any of those organizations. Yet I have strong feelings on the language issue and so do most of my friends who were all born and raised in Montreal. I would even have prefered to answer in french, but since the odds that you understand it are thin, let me put it this way: I think a guy who claims to know what «real people» think should leave his keyboard for a sec, get out the door, and look the f*** around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin, I have a real job (whatever that means) and am not a member of any of those organizations. Yet I have strong feelings on the language issue and so do most of my friends who were all born and raised in Montreal. I would even have prefered to answer in french, but since the odds that you understand it are thin, let me put it this way: I think a guy who claims to know what «real people» think should leave his keyboard for a sec, get out the door, and look the f*** around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Viger</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111963</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Viger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111963</guid>
		<description>Pour être sûr que Future Shop comprenne, il faudrait plutôt dire: we&#039;ll go shopping somewhere else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pour être sûr que Future Shop comprenne, il faudrait plutôt dire: we'll go shopping somewhere else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111956</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111956</guid>
		<description>Heather,

With all due respect to you; as you are a newcommer to Quebec - you may not have witnessed the decline of our historical (anglophone, allophone) community in terms of numbers the way those of us born here have. Half a million Quebecers voted with their feet and left this province over  the past 30-40 years.  A once vibrant community is really not in very good shape in terms of morale and numbers. More to the point - Anglophone communities in places like the Gaspe and Eastern Townships have been severely affected.

I personally do not believe that the language laws where English is forced to be half the size of French is helpful to unity and to the image of this province. Other laws with regard to schooling  could be changed without any effect on the &quot;survival&quot; of French in Quebec. In fact, many of these laws are perceived (and I believe rightfully so) as petty and designed to send a negative message of marginalization to these minority communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather,</p>
<p>With all due respect to you; as you are a newcommer to Quebec - you may not have witnessed the decline of our historical (anglophone, allophone) community in terms of numbers the way those of us born here have. Half a million Quebecers voted with their feet and left this province over  the past 30-40 years.  A once vibrant community is really not in very good shape in terms of morale and numbers. More to the point - Anglophone communities in places like the Gaspe and Eastern Townships have been severely affected.</p>
<p>I personally do not believe that the language laws where English is forced to be half the size of French is helpful to unity and to the image of this province. Other laws with regard to schooling  could be changed without any effect on the "survival" of French in Quebec. In fact, many of these laws are perceived (and I believe rightfully so) as petty and designed to send a negative message of marginalization to these minority communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emile Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111955</link>
		<dc:creator>Emile Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111955</guid>
		<description>That is not the businesses of the future Shop good.  Imagine the opposite: in English written information confuses.  I never bought something that of such websites.  

And why should lower close it in the USA - there not is someone in Canada, that can contain and can compose in our 2 office languages?  

It is laughs entirely correct, that the Future Shop its customers at - anglophone, francophone, allophone, saxophone, al Capone...  

---

Le commentaire précédent ayant les erreurs d&#039;anglais est en fait un lien venant d’une entreprise extérieure et indépendante de chez nous.

J&#039;ai comme priorité de promouvoir l&#039;anglais sur le site Fagstein et je prends très au sérieux la qualité de l&#039;anglais utilisée pour communiquer avec vous.

Je reste à votre disposition pour autre information.

Cordialement,
Emile Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not the businesses of the future Shop good.  Imagine the opposite: in English written information confuses.  I never bought something that of such websites.  </p>
<p>And why should lower close it in the USA - there not is someone in Canada, that can contain and can compose in our 2 office languages?  </p>
<p>It is laughs entirely correct, that the Future Shop its customers at - anglophone, francophone, allophone, saxophone, al Capone...  </p>
<p>---</p>
<p>Le commentaire précédent ayant les erreurs d'anglais est en fait un lien venant d’une entreprise extérieure et indépendante de chez nous.</p>
<p>J'ai comme priorité de promouvoir l'anglais sur le site Fagstein et je prends très au sérieux la qualité de l'anglais utilisée pour communiquer avec vous.</p>
<p>Je reste à votre disposition pour autre information.</p>
<p>Cordialement,<br />
Emile Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111938</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111938</guid>
		<description>I disagree wth you Kevin.  When I came to Quebec from Australia, I knew I was moving to a French community fighting for survival in a sea of English.  Having language laws to protect it makes perfect sense to me.  Quebecers are tolerant, and most will turn a blind eye to obscure, silly violations of the law.  What they will NOT tolerate, is a large corporation with deep pockets nickel-and-dimming service in French.  

Perhaps it&#039;s time for people like Corinthian Rick to realize there&#039;s a lot more to Quebec society than his selfish perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree wth you Kevin.  When I came to Quebec from Australia, I knew I was moving to a French community fighting for survival in a sea of English.  Having language laws to protect it makes perfect sense to me.  Quebecers are tolerant, and most will turn a blind eye to obscure, silly violations of the law.  What they will NOT tolerate, is a large corporation with deep pockets nickel-and-dimming service in French.  </p>
<p>Perhaps it's time for people like Corinthian Rick to realize there's a lot more to Quebec society than his selfish perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111886</link>
		<dc:creator>mdblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111886</guid>
		<description>Fascist is not the right word.  Draconian is much more apt for describing Quebec language laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascist is not the right word.  Draconian is much more apt for describing Quebec language laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Naimard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/12/31/future-shop-survey-french-only/comment-page-1/#comment-111775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Naimard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8014#comment-111775</guid>
		<description>How can they be “fascist” since they have been democratically adopted by a democratically elected government, and they are also constitutional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can they be “fascist” since they have been democratically adopted by a democratically elected government, and they are also constitutional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

