<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFCF sets up HD transmitter to close Super Bowl ad loophole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-418276</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-418276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;If all the CTV wants is revenue why dont they sell the Superbowl like a PPV event?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because it&#039;s available for free on NBC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If all the CTV wants is revenue why dont they sell the Superbowl like a PPV event?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because it's available for free on NBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-418204</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-418204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all the CTV wants is revenue why dont they sell the Superbowl like a PPV event?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all the CTV wants is revenue why dont they sell the Superbowl like a PPV event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even more details about Montreal&#8217;s digital TV transition &#8211; Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-317227</link>
		<dc:creator>Even more details about Montreal&#8217;s digital TV transition &#8211; Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-317227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] CFCF setup a temporary digital transmitter in January specifically so it could get it on air before the Super Bowl to take advantage of simultaneous substitution in HD. In a letter dated Jan. 4, 2011, CTV VP Kevin Goldstein specifically cited the Super Bowl as reason to expedite the application: CTV respectfully requests that the Commission consider this application in an expedited manner as we hope to have Commission approval on or before January 28th, 2011 in advance of the broadcast of the Super Bowl on February 6th, 2011. CTV holds the Canadian broadcast rights to one of the most high profile sporting and broadcasting events of the year and approval of this application will rectify some concerns we have with respect to the requirements of certain BDU&#039;s to carry out simultaneous substitution during this broadcast. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CFCF setup a temporary digital transmitter in January specifically so it could get it on air before the Super Bowl to take advantage of simultaneous substitution in HD. In a letter dated Jan. 4, 2011, CTV VP Kevin Goldstein specifically cited the Super Bowl as reason to expedite the application: CTV respectfully requests that the Commission consider this application in an expedited manner as we hope to have Commission approval on or before January 28th, 2011 in advance of the broadcast of the Super Bowl on February 6th, 2011. CTV holds the Canadian broadcast rights to one of the most high profile sporting and broadcasting events of the year and approval of this application will rectify some concerns we have with respect to the requirements of certain BDU&#039;s to carry out simultaneous substitution during this broadcast. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230999</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your complaint would be kind of ridiculous. 

&quot;Hello CRTC? I want to complain that I was forced to watch a free Canadian broadcast of an American event. It&#039;s just not fair that a Canadian broadcaster would be able to make money off my eyeballs, like they do every other day of the year, instead of letting me watch the American commercials that I didn&#039;t pay for either&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your complaint would be kind of ridiculous. </p>
<p>"Hello CRTC? I want to complain that I was forced to watch a free Canadian broadcast of an American event. It's just not fair that a Canadian broadcaster would be able to make money off my eyeballs, like they do every other day of the year, instead of letting me watch the American commercials that I didn't pay for either"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franc</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230771</link>
		<dc:creator>Franc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And to be fair, given that everyone can watch the commercials online the day after (sometimes the day of), and also given the fact that sim-sub has been there for over 10 years, people in general don&#039;t care about that! Plus, not everyone has HD, so for them, it was just &quot;business as usual&quot; yesterday!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to be fair, given that everyone can watch the commercials online the day after (sometimes the day of), and also given the fact that sim-sub has been there for over 10 years, people in general don't care about that! Plus, not everyone has HD, so for them, it was just "business as usual" yesterday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230769</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;But, I don&#039;t understand how nobody fills any complaint against that CTV thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What CTV did is perfectly legal. To change the rules, you&#039;d have to complain to the CRTC, or get the government to force the CRTC to make changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But, I don't understand how nobody fills any complaint against that CTV thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>What CTV did is perfectly legal. To change the rules, you'd have to complain to the CRTC, or get the government to force the CRTC to make changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But, I don&#039;t understand how nobody fills any complaint against that CTV thing. Are we the only people who are angry of losing the US commercials in Montréal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, I don't understand how nobody fills any complaint against that CTV thing. Are we the only people who are angry of losing the US commercials in Montréal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230742</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have Shaw (StarChoice) satellite service.  We watched the game yesterday in HD on the US West Coast Fox affiliate from Seattle or Portland (I forget which one now) and we received the full U.S. feed with all the U.S. commercials.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have Shaw (StarChoice) satellite service.  We watched the game yesterday in HD on the US West Coast Fox affiliate from Seattle or Portland (I forget which one now) and we received the full U.S. feed with all the U.S. commercials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230730</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, you&#039;re right. It&#039;s on NBC next year. 

Alright then, I&#039;ll get equiped for 2012. I won&#039;t watch a second Canadian Super Bowl, that&#039;s for sure. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, you're right. It's on NBC next year. </p>
<p>Alright then, I'll get equiped for 2012. I won't watch a second Canadian Super Bowl, that's for sure. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230725</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Alright, so if I install an antenna to my HDTV, I&#039;ll get CBS from the United States next year?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, although the Super Bowl next year will be broadcast on NBC.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I live in Laval. Does this stil work in Laval?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For the purposes of simultaneous substitution, Laval is no different from Montreal. Whether it works is a question of whether the antenna can pick up a digital transmission from across the border. The antenna might need to be outside, on a roof, for any signal to be captured.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alright, so if I install an antenna to my HDTV, I'll get CBS from the United States next year?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, although the Super Bowl next year will be broadcast on NBC.</p>
<blockquote><p>I live in Laval. Does this stil work in Laval?</p></blockquote>
<p>For the purposes of simultaneous substitution, Laval is no different from Montreal. Whether it works is a question of whether the antenna can pick up a digital transmission from across the border. The antenna might need to be outside, on a roof, for any signal to be captured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230723</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;To keep in mind for next year, we subscribed to US Time-shifting on Videotron last week, and come game time the American signal was NOT replaced by the CTV&#039;s one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The only thing with this, other than the fact that CTV will probably make sure it doesn&#039;t happen again, is that the time-shifting isn&#039;t available in high definition. I suppose people could switch channels during the commercials (and it wouldn&#039;t matter if they only had SD to start with).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To keep in mind for next year, we subscribed to US Time-shifting on Videotron last week, and come game time the American signal was NOT replaced by the CTV's one.</p></blockquote>
<p>The only thing with this, other than the fact that CTV will probably make sure it doesn't happen again, is that the time-shifting isn't available in high definition. I suppose people could switch channels during the commercials (and it wouldn't matter if they only had SD to start with).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, so if I install an antenna to my HDTV, I&#039;ll get CBS from the United States next year? I hated this year&#039;s Canadian broadcast. I never wanna watch a Canadian Super Bowl ever again.

By the way, I live in Laval. Does this stil work in Laval?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, so if I install an antenna to my HDTV, I'll get CBS from the United States next year? I hated this year's Canadian broadcast. I never wanna watch a Canadian Super Bowl ever again.</p>
<p>By the way, I live in Laval. Does this stil work in Laval?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-230682</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne-Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-230682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To keep in mind for next year, we subscribed to US Time-shifting on Videotron last week, and come game time the American signal was NOT replaced by the CTV&#039;s one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To keep in mind for next year, we subscribed to US Time-shifting on Videotron last week, and come game time the American signal was NOT replaced by the CTV's one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-229873</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-229873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;does anyone know the magnitude of the fine if Videotron chooses not to comply with the SimSub requirement and instead broadcasts the U.S. feed of the Superbowl?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a set fine for this kind of thing, but CTV would take it to the CRTC, which would hold a hearing and eventually order Videotron to comply. If they didn&#039;t, they could face fines or have their license to operate a cable service revoked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>does anyone know the magnitude of the fine if Videotron chooses not to comply with the SimSub requirement and instead broadcasts the U.S. feed of the Superbowl?</p></blockquote>
<p>I don't think there's a set fine for this kind of thing, but CTV would take it to the CRTC, which would hold a hearing and eventually order Videotron to comply. If they didn't, they could face fines or have their license to operate a cable service revoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-229769</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-229769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just curious - does anyone know the magnitude of the fine if Videotron chooses not to comply with the SimSub requirement and instead broadcasts the U.S. feed of the Superbowl?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious - does anyone know the magnitude of the fine if Videotron chooses not to comply with the SimSub requirement and instead broadcasts the U.S. feed of the Superbowl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pissed_off_videotron_subscriber</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-229640</link>
		<dc:creator>Pissed_off_videotron_subscriber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-229640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could someone do us a favor and go up to the f*cking transmitter and tear it down?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone do us a favor and go up to the f*cking transmitter and tear it down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATSC</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-228631</link>
		<dc:creator>ATSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-228631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SRC and CBC Montreal stations may even begin transmitting from Mont-Royal even before September 2011. There was indication months ago that they would kick in before that with lower power signals. But, there have been some sort of delays?

As for the % mentioned about picture lock, each TV internal tuner is different. So is the % at which the signal meter measures picture lock. Some models lock at 60%, some lock at 34%, some at other %&#039;s, some don&#039;t even use a percentage and use a bar indicator. What I&#039;m trying to point out is, you need to find out at what point you get a picture lock on your TV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SRC and CBC Montreal stations may even begin transmitting from Mont-Royal even before September 2011. There was indication months ago that they would kick in before that with lower power signals. But, there have been some sort of delays?</p>
<p>As for the % mentioned about picture lock, each TV internal tuner is different. So is the % at which the signal meter measures picture lock. Some models lock at 60%, some lock at 34%, some at other %'s, some don't even use a percentage and use a bar indicator. What I'm trying to point out is, you need to find out at what point you get a picture lock on your TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fassero</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-228606</link>
		<dc:creator>Fassero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-228606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love CTV press releases. Of course, the bigger reality not mentioned is that satellite subscribers already had access to HD &quot;CTV programming&quot; for years via CTV East and West (fancy-talk for &quot;Toronto and Vancouver&quot;.) The more honest release should have read as follows:

&quot;CTV announces that it&#039;s digital transmitter is up sufficiently enough to screw up the Super Bowl. To Videotron and it&#039;s subscribers this weekend: Suck It!&quot; 

Meanwhile in Gatineau, Bell is begging for the CTV acquisition to go through by throwing bones at independent producers and local news coverage but threatening to shut down A Channel - as in the A Channel they opted to take (read: overpay for) in order to get clearance for the CHUM acquisition a few years ago. Watch in the next five years how this network does everything in it&#039;s power to try and pare itself down to the four cities where they have the digital transmitters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love CTV press releases. Of course, the bigger reality not mentioned is that satellite subscribers already had access to HD "CTV programming" for years via CTV East and West (fancy-talk for "Toronto and Vancouver".) The more honest release should have read as follows:</p>
<p>"CTV announces that it's digital transmitter is up sufficiently enough to screw up the Super Bowl. To Videotron and it's subscribers this weekend: Suck It!" </p>
<p>Meanwhile in Gatineau, Bell is begging for the CTV acquisition to go through by throwing bones at independent producers and local news coverage but threatening to shut down A Channel - as in the A Channel they opted to take (read: overpay for) in order to get clearance for the CHUM acquisition a few years ago. Watch in the next five years how this network does everything in it's power to try and pare itself down to the four cities where they have the digital transmitters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex H</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-228415</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-228415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In winter conditions, sometimes signal is lost for various reasons.  Snow changes some relfectivity, might be blocking the signal.  The temporary antennas might also be taking on a bit of ice and being less effective.   With digital, it&#039;s really &quot;yes or no&quot;, you could have a perfect picture at 60% signal, and absolutely nothing at 55%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In winter conditions, sometimes signal is lost for various reasons.  Snow changes some relfectivity, might be blocking the signal.  The temporary antennas might also be taking on a bit of ice and being less effective.   With digital, it's really "yes or no", you could have a perfect picture at 60% signal, and absolutely nothing at 55%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/01/28/cfcf-hd-super-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-228380</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=10213#comment-228380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the various broadcasters have setup temporary digital transmitters on temporary channels and in temporary locations. At the end of August, when the CRTC requires the analog transmitters shut down, transmitters will be installed at the Mount Royal antenna tower and hooked up to new antennas that went up in the summer of 2010. Not only will they be higher and have a clearer line of sight, but they should also be more powerful, and so easier to receive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the various broadcasters have setup temporary digital transmitters on temporary channels and in temporary locations. At the end of August, when the CRTC requires the analog transmitters shut down, transmitters will be installed at the Mount Royal antenna tower and hooked up to new antennas that went up in the summer of 2010. Not only will they be higher and have a clearer line of sight, but they should also be more powerful, and so easier to receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
