<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of Cyberpresse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andréanne Bouchard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-355276</link>
		<dc:creator>Andréanne Bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-355276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get that but they recently launched new websites and even though it&#039;s the same template and everything, as well as for other newspapers of Sun Medie across Canada, they still have a distinct web address for each newspaper and you don&#039;t see JOURNAL DE MONTRÉAL above the Journal de Québec name. And Canoe was some kind of a separate entity, the same way Cyberpresse was for Gesca. Now, &quot;LaPresse.ca&quot;, it&#039;s just messy, confusing and condescending for readers of the others newspapers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that but they recently launched new websites and even though it's the same template and everything, as well as for other newspapers of Sun Medie across Canada, they still have a distinct web address for each newspaper and you don't see JOURNAL DE MONTRÉAL above the Journal de Québec name. And Canoe was some kind of a separate entity, the same way Cyberpresse was for Gesca. Now, "LaPresse.ca", it's just messy, confusing and condescending for readers of the others newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-353012</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-353012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Quebecor, which is known for it&#039;s tendency to centralize everything, kept different URLs for the new look of their newspapers websites, for the Journal de Québec and the Journal de Montréal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In fact, these papers used to be under the canoe.ca &quot;portal&quot;, and the Journal de Montréal didn&#039;t really even have its own website until the lockout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Quebecor, which is known for it's tendency to centralize everything, kept different URLs for the new look of their newspapers websites, for the Journal de Québec and the Journal de Montréal.</p></blockquote>
<p>In fact, these papers used to be under the canoe.ca "portal", and the Journal de Montréal didn't really even have its own website until the lockout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-353011</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-353011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; Is this a way to slowly get us used to have the name La Presse on our news so that they can, in the future, make the same kind of change for the printed newspapers???&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can see it now: &quot;La Presse de Québec&quot;, &quot;La Presse de Sherbrooke&quot; etc. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Is this a way to slowly get us used to have the name La Presse on our news so that they can, in the future, make the same kind of change for the printed newspapers???</p></blockquote>
<p>I can see it now: "La Presse de Québec", "La Presse de Sherbrooke" etc. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-352965</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-352965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from http://twitter.com/#!/ChantalHbert

ChantalHbert chantal hébert
Site rénové de La Presse: j&#039;ai passé la journée à penser que j&#039;étais sur celui de Radio-Canada!!!
25 Oct]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/ChantalHbert" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/#!/ChantalHbert</a></p>
<p>ChantalHbert chantal hébert<br />
Site rénové de La Presse: j'ai passé la journée à penser que j'étais sur celui de Radio-Canada!!!<br />
25 Oct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andréanne Bouchard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-352831</link>
		<dc:creator>Andréanne Bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-352831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I would add that Quebecor, which is known for it&#039;s tendency to centralize everything, kept different URLs for the new look of their newspapers websites, for the Journal de Québec and the Journal de Montréal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I would add that Quebecor, which is known for it's tendency to centralize everything, kept different URLs for the new look of their newspapers websites, for the Journal de Québec and the Journal de Montréal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andréanne Bouchard</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-352828</link>
		<dc:creator>Andréanne Bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-352828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THANK YOU!! 

I&#039;m appaled by the change since it happened and I&#039;ve had not a shred of understanding from the staff at Cyberpresse/LaPresse. To my complaints, they&#039;ve answered that they NOW offer separate adresses for regional papers like lesoleil.com and lenouvelliste.ca, which is a TOTAL LIE because those adresses have been active for years, in fact for as long as Cyberpresse existed they kept each paper adresses to redirect to Cyberpresse. They also told me, more or less, to stop complaining, that the content is the same and that you still see the local papers name under La Presse.

The media releases ar ALSO incredibly insulting by saying, and I translate as best as I can here, that : This change aims to offer a unified trademark wether you choose to get your information from our website, our printed newspaper, our apps or our social media accounts. (&quot;Ce changement vise principalement à proposer une marque unifiée que vous choisissiez de vous informer à travers notre site web, notre journal papier, nos applications ou par le biais de nos comptes sur les médias sociaux.&quot;)

Note the fact that newspaper is singular. Like every other paper that is under the Gesca umbrella suddenly disappeared!!! It is incredibly ridiculous to have to log to lapresse.ca to read Le Soleil&#039;s online edition or even to SUBSCRIBE to it online!!!!! 

This only makes me wonder what&#039;s next? Is this a way to slowly get us used to have the name La Presse on our news so that they can, in the future, make the same kind of change for the printed newspapers???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!! </p>
<p>I'm appaled by the change since it happened and I've had not a shred of understanding from the staff at Cyberpresse/LaPresse. To my complaints, they've answered that they NOW offer separate adresses for regional papers like lesoleil.com and lenouvelliste.ca, which is a TOTAL LIE because those adresses have been active for years, in fact for as long as Cyberpresse existed they kept each paper adresses to redirect to Cyberpresse. They also told me, more or less, to stop complaining, that the content is the same and that you still see the local papers name under La Presse.</p>
<p>The media releases ar ALSO incredibly insulting by saying, and I translate as best as I can here, that : This change aims to offer a unified trademark wether you choose to get your information from our website, our printed newspaper, our apps or our social media accounts. ("Ce changement vise principalement à proposer une marque unifiée que vous choisissiez de vous informer à travers notre site web, notre journal papier, nos applications ou par le biais de nos comptes sur les médias sociaux.")</p>
<p>Note the fact that newspaper is singular. Like every other paper that is under the Gesca umbrella suddenly disappeared!!! It is incredibly ridiculous to have to log to lapresse.ca to read Le Soleil's online edition or even to SUBSCRIBE to it online!!!!! </p>
<p>This only makes me wonder what's next? Is this a way to slowly get us used to have the name La Presse on our news so that they can, in the future, make the same kind of change for the printed newspapers???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert H</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-352336</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-352336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, how long have you been living in Montreal, Johnny?  A week? Sorry, I couldn&#039;t resist, but seriously, I hope your question reflects nothing but a fading remnant of the old two-solitudes divide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how long have you been living in Montreal, Johnny?  A week? Sorry, I couldn't resist, but seriously, I hope your question reflects nothing but a fading remnant of the old two-solitudes divide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351895</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh, I thought I read 2007. If 1999 then my theory may hold true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, I thought I read 2007. If 1999 then my theory may hold true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351660</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe I am making excuses but the only plausible reason to create a different brand was due to the relative immaturity of the internet in 2007.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Cyberpresse dates back to at least 1999.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe I am making excuses but the only plausible reason to create a different brand was due to the relative immaturity of the internet in 2007.</p></blockquote>
<p>Cyberpresse dates back to at least 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351658</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;What the heck is Cyberpresse? I never heard of it until now, and yes, I live in Montreal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I guess you don&#039;t follow the news then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What the heck is Cyberpresse? I never heard of it until now, and yes, I live in Montreal.</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess you don't follow the news then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351651</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huh? What the heck is Cyberpresse? I never heard of it until now, and yes, I live in Montreal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? What the heck is Cyberpresse? I never heard of it until now, and yes, I live in Montreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351629</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always found it strange that a company would change it&#039;s name for their web presence. Maybe I am making excuses but the only plausible reason to create a different brand was due to the relative immaturity of the internet in 2007. But no that was only four years ago. More likely just a bad decision that has been corrected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always found it strange that a company would change it's name for their web presence. Maybe I am making excuses but the only plausible reason to create a different brand was due to the relative immaturity of the internet in 2007. But no that was only four years ago. More likely just a bad decision that has been corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351566</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you notice that the new typo is exactly identical as the National Bank publicity typo? We can see it well in your first screen capture. I am not a specialist in marketing, but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you notice that the new typo is exactly identical as the National Bank publicity typo? We can see it well in your first screen capture. I am not a specialist in marketing, but...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/10/25/the-death-of-cyberpresse/comment-page-1/#comment-351484</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=11081#comment-351484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Le site congolais n&#039;a pas aimé la nouvelle mouture de cyberpresse..!

http://technaute.cyberpresse.ca/nouvelles/internet/200908/10/01-891316-le-cousin-africain-de-cyberpresse.php
http://direct.cd/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Le site congolais n'a pas aimé la nouvelle mouture de cyberpresse..!</p>
<p><a href="http://technaute.cyberpresse.ca/nouvelles/internet/200908/10/01-891316-le-cousin-africain-de-cyberpresse.php" rel="nofollow">http://technaute.cyberpresse.ca/nouvelles/internet/200908/10/01-891316-le-cousin-africain-de-cyberpresse.php</a><br />
<a href="http://direct.cd/" rel="nofollow">http://direct.cd/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
