Show me an able-bodied 20-year-old who can’t find a job and I’ll show you a shiftless, lying bum.
It always amuses me when people paid to be ignorant blowhards complain about young people not working hard enough to make a living.
Show me an able-bodied 20-year-old who can’t find a job and I’ll show you a shiftless, lying bum.
It always amuses me when people paid to be ignorant blowhards complain about young people not working hard enough to make a living.
I was planning to post a roundup of Griffintown-related news, but there’s more than I could possibly summarize in a blog post. So instead, I’ll just point you to the two blogs covering the issue: Save Griffintown and CSR Griffintown. Both point especially to a petition demanding a more democratic public consultation process.
RadCan’s Sur le Web, a blog-style page with links to interesting things online, has added the ability for users to comment, except with a strange rule: No links. Period.
Sur le Web is a very strange animal in the local blogosphere:
Now this. I’m seriously tempted to unsubscribe as a protest, and would have done so long ago had the site been any less useful for information. But the fact that it seems to intentionally make it as difficult as possible to use annoys me to no end.
I couldn’t care less about comments. Fix everything else first.
But the fact that a blog about links to stuff online doesn’t allow links in its comments? That’s insane.
Among some of RadCan’s other draconian rules:
If similar rules had been put in place at CBC.ca, we’d be hearing about it. Maybe we need a Radio-Canada version of Inside the CBC?
Tonight is yet another edition of YULblog, the monthly get-together and drink-together (and then poutine-together) of Montreal’s blogging community.
I hope to make it after work, though I’m in the middle of eight consecutive shifts right now (sweet, sweet overtime money, how I will enjoy spending you) and might be semi-conscious.
For those of you who haven’t been to a YULblog before, here’s an idea of some of the sights you might encounter at La Quincaillerie:
As part of Matt Forsythe’s citizen journalism class at Concordia University, students are being asked to create their own niche blogs.
Though most are very basic (after all, they’re beginners), this has greatly boosted the size of the Montreal anglo blogosphere, which is good because I’m running out of blogs to profile.
Here are a few of the blogs that seem pretty interesting, and we hope they continue to grow:
You probably already know the story, so I’ll just provide you some colour commentary, courtesy of the Habs Inside/Out chat room immediately following the game:
usversusthem:OMGOMGOMGGOMG
Barts:ya baby
FawtMan:CMONN HET
usversusthem:OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG
FawtMan:HUET
Leo G.:woooooohohhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Elbacky:ahhhhhhhhhh
dicktracy:………………………………..
Mattee.:WE WIN!
FawtMan:?
Leo G.:omg
FawtMan:OMG
Mattee.:I LOVE EVERYONE!
FawtMan:WE WIN
Sulemaan:NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
FawtMan:HOLY SHIT / I LOVE YOU GUSY
Mattee.:HOLY MOFO!
FawtMan:MARK MY WORDS
usversusthem:wowwwwwww
FawtMan:?
usversusthem:omg thank you god
Mattee.:AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sadave:Huettttttttt!
Elbacky:Price gets the win……technicallities
dicktracy:$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
yehaken:first time in habs franchise history winning when down by 5 goals
usversusthem:wowwww
FawtMan:OMGG
koivu11price31@hotmail.com:omg
Sulemaan:of all the !$#@#!@ gams not to watch (but at least I got to listen to it via radio and read it here)
FawtMan:WE WON? / HOLY BUTTSECKS
Barts:THIS CHAT ROOM IS GOLD
Mattee.:5-0 EAT THAT!
dicktracy:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
dusty baker:teach, me too, are you also in the states?
dicktracy:MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Elbacky:alright lets see what happens in ottawa now
dicktracy:YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Barts:Mio you’re the best
dicktracy:GGGGGGGGGGGGod
The Teacher:ohhh.it’s huet in the shootout
Mattee.:I JUST THREW MY LAPTOP I”M SO HAPPY!
The Teacher:lol
usversusthem:i just want to say… i love you all so much
Elbacky:hhaha mattee
Mattee.:HAAAAAAAAAAAA!
UPDATE:
and, uhh, Maxim Lapierre scores Montreal’s second goal. Poor Michael Ryder. First he loses his hat trick to Streit, now Newsday takes away another goal. Then again, it seems they left halfway through the second period.
I’ve spent the last hour watching Jon Lajoie videos after being reminded of them by The Domster.
I talked about one of his videos in December, but really they’re all good. I hesitate to recommend any specific ones because that would imply others are less good, but Everyday Normal Guy has a sequel for a reason:
Did I mention he’s a Montrealer? You can see some hints of that in some of his videos.
UPDATE (Feb. 22): More info from Cyberpresse.
Montrealer Julien Smith is resuming his In Over Your Head hip hop podcast after an extended absence (and some sponsorship).
So if you like hip hop mixed with a guy talking about himself (and really, isn’t that what hip hop is all about?) go ahead and subscribe to the feed.
Being subscribed to as many feeds as I am, I see a lot of different types of posts come up repeatedly. The meme post, the viral video, the apology for lack of blogging.
Among them is the anniversary post. One year of blogging, three years of blogging, 1,000 posts, 666 posts, etc.
On the occasion of Fagstein’s first anniversary, I’ll add some content so this isn’t a wasted post. But that content will be about me.
Media blogger Julien Brault interviewed me for his blog (reposted at CentPapiers). His questions included some FAQs that I figure I’d repost here in English:
You blog really late at night. Why is that?
My sleep schedule, mainly. My job is an evening one, that sometimes goes as late as 1:30am. There’s also the much more pathetic reason that I find late-night TV much more interesting than early-morning TV. So I tend to sleep between 3am and noon instead of more sane hours of other people.
I tend to blog near the end of the day because that’s when I compose my thoughts. Earlier parts of the day involve reading newspapers and other blogs and making note of those I want to talk about.
Why did you start your blog?
Because I like to talk. I had been blogging personally between friends and eventually decided some non-personal stuff should have a wider audience. I also wanted to build a personal brand, prove to potential employers that I understand the Internet and have an excuse to go to Yulblog meetings (since I write about blogs).
What’s the difference between your blog posts and articles?
I don’t have to have blog posts approved by editors before I write them. On the other hand, I’m not paid for blog posts. Articles involve much more attention to the writing, more interviews and research, and are written for a different format. With blog posts, I can have a bit more fun, talk about myself, and use links and comments to do stuff I couldn’t do in newspaper articles.
Do you ever expect to make money from this? Are you planning to add ads?
Let’s be realistic. My traffic isn’t bad for a local blog, but it’s nowhere near what I’d need to be able to make money off of it, much less enough to live on. Even the celebrity bloggers here have other jobs that pay them more money. If it gets to the point where ads will bring in some money, I might add them, if only to offset hosting costs. But there’s not much point now.
I also look at it as having an indirect impact. I’ve gotten story ideas from this blog, developed contacts, and learned quite a bit. These non-tangible things might help me later on. But mostly I do this for fun.
Will blogs be the end of newspapers?
It depends on what you mean by “blog” and what you mean by “newspaper.” Blogs aren’t some magical force, nor are they all the same. Blogging is simply a publishing system that has articles in reverse chronological order. What you put on it defines what it is. So it’s very hard to make blanket statements about “blogs.”
As for newspapers, their main feature is their team of journalists. TV and radio don’t come close, mainly because they have to devote so much of their staff to technical matters and their journalists have to spend more time on each story. So the stories everyone talks about (including the bloggers) mainly come from local newspapers. That hasn’t changed yet.
Right now, the primary source for newspaper revenue is print advertising. Eventually, that might change and online advertising will become the primary revenue source. Once that happens, you’ll see a lot of newspapers shifting gears (beyond the current lip-service they give to online media) and focusing on digital distribution methods.
I think the newspaper as a format may be on the decline (though it will take decades before they truly disappear), but the journalism that comes out of them is what matters, and there will always be a market for that.
What’s your traffic like?
Not sure how to rate it quantitatively. It’s higher than some, lower than others. I get about 15,000 unique visitors a month, or 1,000 visits a day. Most of it is from other bloggers, friends, people in the media stealing my ideas, and of course myself. I have about 65 subscribers through Google Reader, plus another 20 or so using other services. My top referrers include Montreal City Weblog, Spacing Montreal, Dominic Arpin and Patrick Lagacé. The latter creates a firestorm when he links to me in one of his posts (as he did today), tripling my regular traffic for that day. So I don’t pretend I’m all that.
Any other questions?
My latest blog profile is the relatively new Comme les Chinois, by Spacing Montreal contributor Cedric Sam. It talks about Chinatown, the local Chinese community, profiles local Chinese people, and basically talks about everything that relates to being Chinese in Montreal.
The blog’s name comes from Les Chinois, a 1988 pop single by Quebec singer Mitsou, the lyrics of which suggest Chinese people treat their lovers well. On his blog, Sam took a lyric from that song, “regarde les chinois” literally, and one of its regular features is interviews members of Montreal’s Chinese community.
UPDATE: Kate blogs about Spacing’s blogging about my article about Cedric’s blog. So I figured I’d blog that.

Quick: Which of these two is Frank Hashimoto and which is Bruno Guglielminetti?
You know, it occurs to me that I’ve never seen them in the same room together…

Dominic Arpin is setting up a new blog
Dominic Arpin is back! Over three months since he gave up blogging and two months since his show Vlog went off the air. His first post describes what he’s been up to since.
It’s about time.
UPDATE: The best part about it: Not having to register with Canoe before I leave a comment.
UPDATE (Feb. 9): Bruno Guglielminetti has an interview (Windows Bleedia, sorry) with the Domster, in which he explains the blog is an independent venture designed to build a personal brand that would outlast his career at TVA (not that he’s planning on leaving anytime soon).
Arpin, meanwhile, is red-faced over all the attention he’s getting (he was a vedette at this week’s Yulblog), even from me, whom he calls his “plus fidèle tortionnaire.” I was going to complain that he used a complicated French word which Google translated as “torturer,” but looking back at that graphic I guess I did pick on him a bit. (Writing a newspaper article that called him a thief probably didn’t help either ;)
Global Quebec likes to run the occasional 5-second ad for anchor Jamie Orchard’s blog. I find this odd, because she updates it about once a month, which hardly makes it qualify as a blog, much less make it advertising-worthy.
Today, she added her first new post since Dec. 4, complaining about bus service on the island. It’s an example of what not to do with blogs.
Let me explain:
There are other minor things like the horrible formatting, but those two are the most important.
Mainstream media outlets are clueless about this blog thing and are just throwing stuff out there to see what sticks. Unfortunately, that leaves us with a lot of junk. I don’t want my journalists to sound just like those uninformed idiots on MySpace. I want something new and interesting. The faster journalist-bloggers (and the media companies who don’t want to pay them a cent to do this extra work) understand that, the faster we’ll see blogs that are worth our attention.
And while I sympathize with people whose buses arrive late, I don’t think exaggeration is warranted here. This isn’t some third-world country. The vast majority of buses do arrive on time and take people to their destination without incident.
I lived for five years in the West Island taking a bus every day downtown to study. Up to three hours of transit time each day. Sometimes buses wouldn’t show up, and I’d be left out in the cold for up to an hour. But even when I got frustrated, I never condemned the entire system like others have. I moved closer to the city, next to a metro station where I don’t have to worry about catching a bus to get downtown.
Yes, Montreal (and Quebec, and the unions, and STM management and everyone else) should do more to ensure quality public transit. But Montrealers need to be a bit more tolerant toward small disruptions in service. Montreal’s transit network is among the most reliable in the world, and I think we’ve taken that for granted.
The Toronto Sun has apologized after Torontoist noticed an article the Sun ran copied a paragraph word-for-word from a blog post of theirs two days earlier. Though the blog considers the matter closed, Craig Silverman does his usual complaint that the apology is too brief, doesn’t explain how the error occurred and doesn’t say if there was an investigation into the reporter’s past articles for instances of plagiarism.
Meanwhile, I’m still waiting for one of the big papers to plagiarize one of my posts without credit. When is it going to be my turn?

Bored? CBC’s latest rendition of Test The Nation just finished on TV (though you can take the test online). Among the six teams fighting it out in studio were “bloggers” (Here are their mugshots). The team includes some well-known Montrealers:
Nulman has guaranteed that the blogger group will be victorious over celebrity look-alikes, cab drivers, backpackers, chefs and flight crews. Can they pull it off? Considering how skewed the questions are toward technology trivia (there’s even an entire section on it), I wouldn’t be surprised…
UPDATE: 26 questions in, and the bloggers are leading.
UPDATE: Nulman breathes a sigh of relief, as the bloggers easily take the competition with an average score of 50/60. Highest is Rick Spence at 57. I scored a still-respectable 47.
UPDATE: The CBC actually does a pretty darn decent job rounding up the post-test blogger reaction. They also put up some fun statistical stuff (StatsCan they are not), which shows that meateaters scored better than vegetarians, heavy Internet users scored more than light Internet users, and that Quebec outscored every other province (HA! Suck it Alberta!). The best: Nunavut. The worst: PEI.
Raymond Viger doesn’t read La Presse because the newspaper is too big and he can’t deal with stories split over more than one page.
I can understand that. I’m not crazy about giant papers, especially when I’m in transit. But why not just read the articles online?
I’ve always had to remind myself that it’s MichelLeblanc.com and not MichelleBlanc.com when I visit his blog, but I never saw this coming.
Wow.
UPDATE (Jan. 20): Lagacé writes a column about this.
This week’s Justify Your Existence is Jacques Grondin, a member of the Montreal Ron Paul Meetup Group. Despite being a Canadian citizen, and not an American one, he’s campaigning for Paul here in Montreal, trying to raise his profile among American expatriates and Canadians who will be affected by this presidential race.
Montreal isn’t part of the U.S. Why campaign here?
Grondin: It’s a dilemma. Most of the people we talk to are Canadians and not Americans. But there are plenty of Americans in Montreal, plenty of tourists. Pierre Trudeau was very popular in the U.S. John F. Kennedy was popular in Canada and around the world. Paul fits into that class.
You’re Canadian. Why not get involved in Canadian politics, instead?
Grondin: There is no Ron Paul in Canada. The closest thing you’ll find is the Canadian Action Party, and I’m a member of that, as well. But getting into the White House is a bigger goal.
Also this week is a short profile of Matthew Forsythe’s blog at comingupforair.net. He’s an accomplished illustrator who likes to make sketches of the world around him. (He’s already put out the welcome mat for readers.)
Nicolas Langelier has a what’s in/what’s out list in La Presse. Included in the “what’s out” part is this:
Les journalistes blogueurs dont les billets consistent essentiellement en des questions du genre: “Et vous, qu’est-ce que vous en pensez?”
What do you think?
I’ll admit it, I’m vain. I check my logs regularly and scour the Internet looking for people who are talking about me. I get giddy when other blogs (no matter how insignificant) link to mine, and even giddier when it’s praised by people more important than me.
This week Nicolas Cossette of the Montreal Social Media blog put mine in a list of seven important local blogs. It’s a very subjective list, and it doesn’t include some smaller but very interesting blogs about Montreal, but still yay me.
Included with the entry on me is this statement:
I would say that if (traditional) journalism has difficulties to reach a younger audience, that’s partly because of blogs like his where you can find all the news about the city plus a lot more.
There’s this idea a lot of people have that my blog (and/or others) serves as a replacement for newspapers. There’s two reasons why I disagree with this:
Speaking of Kate’s blog, every month she’s consistently one of my top two referrers (traffic that comes to my blog through links from other websites). The other is Patrick Lagacé. Both have me on their blogrolls and link to me occasionally.
But when Patrick links to my blog in one of his posts, I have to pray my cheap server doesn’t fail it dwarfs all my regular traffic with a flood of curious French-speaking people (who apparently all take one look at my blog and close it). So I’m expecting something similar this month as he linked to me in two consecutive posts.
The first calls Fagstein the best media blog in the city (thank you) in an unrelated post about some silly criticism of him. (Despite how vain I am, I’ve developed a pretty thick skin when it comes to criticism. Most of it is brainless loudmouthing, which should be dismissed. The rest is useful criticism which should be embraced.)
So yeah, I’m awesome.