<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fagstein &#187; Biscuits Leclerc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/tag/biscuits-leclerc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Le Devoir sued for correctly reporting outrageous cookie claims</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/23/le-devoir-sued-for-correctly-reporting-outrageous-cookie-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/23/le-devoir-sued-for-correctly-reporting-outrageous-cookie-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biscuits Leclerc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Le Devoir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=2103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Le Devoir is apparently being sued by a cookie company because of an article that criticized the company for marketing cookies as encouraging weight loss and preventing cancer. I can't find the original article online, but the letter from the company in response is there: It says in no uncertain terms that the company has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Le Devoir is apparently <a href="http://www.matin.qc.ca/articles/20080723093848/devoir_poursuivi.html">being sued by a cookie company</a> because of an article that criticized the company for marketing cookies as encouraging weight loss and preventing cancer.</p>
<p>I can't find the original article online, but <a href="http://www.ledevoir.com/2008/04/19/185858.html">the letter from the company in response</a> is there: It says in no uncertain terms that the company has never suggested that its Praeventia brand cookies had these kinds of benefits:</p>
<blockquote><p>Or jamais Leclerc n'a prétendu que les biscuits Praeventia avaient des vertus amaigrissantes.</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>Jamais l'entreprise n'a présenté ce produit «comme un aliment anticancer»</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I guess that settles that, then.</p>
<p>Here's the thing:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2104" title="Praeventia\'s crazy health claims" src="http://blog.fagstein.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/praeventia.png" alt="Screenshot from Praeventia\'s website" width="500" height="615" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.praeventia.ca/en/numerous-benefits.php">This web page</a> includes the words "prevent certain cancers" three times. And though the company may be correct that they don't claim it'll cause weight loss, they certainly imply it pretty hard here (the words "weight control" also appear in the text).</p>
<p>Note to Biscuits Leclerc: Before you file your lawsuit, be sure to scrub exculpatory evidence from your website first.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/04/01/le-devoir-to-charge-for-tweets/' title='Le Devoir to charge for tweets'>Le Devoir to charge for tweets</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/11/17/le-devoir-des-ecrivains/' title='A writer&#8217;s newspaper'>A writer&#8217;s newspaper</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/02/17/le-devoir-newsroom-audio/' title='Listen to Le Devoir (or, you know, don&#8217;t)'>Listen to Le Devoir (or, you know, don&#8217;t)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/01/30/le-devoir-on-youtube/' title='Le Devoir discovers YouTube'>Le Devoir discovers YouTube</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/01/10/bonne-anniversaire-le-devoir/' title='Bon anniversaire, Le Devoir'>Bon anniversaire, Le Devoir</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/07/23/le-devoir-sued-for-correctly-reporting-outrageous-cookie-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

