<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fagstein &#187; CKNX-TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/tag/cknx-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the new TV</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/31/welcome-to-the-new-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/31/welcome-to-the-new-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJNT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Dumont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MuchMusic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TQS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week has a lot of changes for television both local and nationally. Two main reasons for this: it's September and the fall season is starting, plus CRTC broadcast licenses for conventional television stations end on Aug. 31. This week's Bluffer's Guide (courtesy of yours truly) looks at the changes happening on the local television [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week has a lot of changes for television both local and nationally. Two main reasons for this: it's September and the fall season is starting, plus CRTC broadcast licenses for conventional television stations end on Aug. 31.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Bluffer+Guide/1946129/story.html">This week's Bluffer's Guide</a> (courtesy of yours truly) looks at the changes happening on the local television dial. <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/a-week-of-reckoning-for-canadian-tv/article1269988/">The Globe and Mail's Grant Robertson also has a piece this morning</a>, looking particularly at the upheaval at small money-losing stations owned by Canwest and CTVglobemedia.</p>
<p>Here's a timeline of what's going on this week in television:</p>
<p>Today, Aug. 31</p>
<ul>
<li>5:30am: Channel Zero begins airing new programming on CJNT Montreal and CHCH Hamilton, only a few days after <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/28/crtc-okays-cjnt-chch-purchase/">the CRTC approved the sale</a> of the stations from Canwest. Channel Zero, which <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/channel-zero-offers-to-buy-cjnt-chch/">owns some cable channels</a> but no conventional television stations, is <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/28/crtc-roundup-cjnt-chch/">supplementing CJNT's existing programming with foreign-language music videos and films</a>. CHCH, meanwhile, will become all-news during the day (<a href="http://www.thespec.com/News/Business/article/626198">its afternoon schedule will have movies until the infrastructure is ready</a>) with movies in primetime. The license officially changes hands at 12am on Sept. 1.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/August2009/28/c8297.html">Showcase rebrands</a></li>
<li>MuchMusic's digital specialty channels MuchVibe, MuchLOUD, MuchMoreRetro, PunchMuch <a href="http://www.channelcanada.com/Article3368.html">go commercial-free</a>. MuchMusic and MuchMoreMusic - which still have enough viewers to sell commercials - continue to air ads, as will programs that are simulcasted on the digital specialty channels and Much or MMM.</li>
<li>CTV-owned "A" channel in Wingham, Ont., shuts down local programming and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKNX-TV">CKNX-TV</a> becomes a retransmitter of CFPL-TV, the A station in London. The station is part of three that CTV had looked at selling or shutting down. Another, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKX-TV">CKX-TV</a> in Brandon, Man., has been <a href="http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/July2009/16/c6860.html">sold to Bluepoint Investmestment Corp.</a>, and the third, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHWI-TV">CHWI-TV</a> in Windsor, Ont., was <a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/Channel+gets+another+year/1771297/story.html">saved from shutdown</a> after the CRTC approved the Local Programming Improvement Fund. All three had received <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/">offers from Shaw</a> to buy them, but then <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/">Shaw changed its mind</a>.</li>
<li>The BBM ratings system switches to the "<a href="http://www.bbm.ca/en/ppm.html">Personal People Meter</a>", a device that had been tested in the Montreal market, to allow nationwide monitoring of what people watch and listen to on TV and radio. The PPM is a pager-like device worn by sample audiences, and replaces the less accurate diaries that relied on self-reporting.</li>
<li>6am: TQS officially becomes V as the broadcast day begins with <a href="http://vtele.ca/emissions/leshowdumatin/">Le show du matin</a></li>
<li>5pm: CBC Montreal launches its new 90-minute newscast along with <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/08/31/cbc-tv-newscast-90min.html?ref=fagsteinrules">other stations across the country</a>. The newscast will be structured as three consecutive 30-minute newscasts, and is part of CBC's "integration" (read: convergence) strategy of having journalists do stories for TV and radio at the same time (so they <a href="http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=4173">don't have to hire any more journalists</a>). <a href="http://www.thesuburbannews.ca/content/en/2116">The competition says they're not worried</a>.</li>
<li>8am (6am in Red Deer): CHCA, an E! network station in Red Deer, Alta., <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/08/31/calgary-chca-red-deer-news.html">goes off the air</a>. (UPDATE: Its last newscast, from last Friday, has been <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVRUlhmVxhM">uploaded to YouTube</a> in eight parts)</li>
<li>8:30am (5:30am in Kelowna): CHBC, a former E! network station in Kelowna, B.C., is rebranded "Global Okanagan" as the E! network shuts down.</li>
</ul>
<p>Tomorrow, Sept. 1</p>
<ul>
<li>12am: The CRTC begins billing cable and satellite companies 1.5% of their revenues for a Local Programming Improvement Fund, to help small-market television stations. Bell and Shaw, Canada's satellite providers, have <a href="http://www.digitalhome.ca/content/view/3992/279/">responded by adding a 1.5% fee to consumers' bills</a> beginning today. Videotron, Quebec's main cable provider, hasn't decided to follow suit yet.</li>
<li>At the same time, the CRTC lifts the cap on the amount of advertising conventional television stations can air. It had previously been at 15 minutes per hour. The CRTC believes that the market will self-regulate the amount of advertising (after all, a station with too many ads is going to lose viewers).</li>
<li>1am (10pm in Victoria): <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">CHEK-TV in Victoria goes off the air</span>. See below.</li>
<li>6am: As conventional broadcast stations across the country (at least the ones that are part of large networks like Global, CTV, CityTV and TVA) get new one-year licenses, <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/">new local programming requirements</a> come into effect. They require 7 hours of original programming for small markets and 14 hours for large markets (the latter includes Montreal on both the anglo and franco side). TVA's local programming numbers are defined on a case-by-case basis: 18 hours a week for Quebec City and 5 hours a week for Rimouski, Chicoutimi and Sherbrooke. TQS, because it got special consideration from the CRTC after going bankrupt, isn't affected by these changes.</li>
<li>Three stations formerly of the E! network but owned by the Jim Pattison Broadcast Group - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHAT-TV">CHAT-TV</a> in <a href="http://www.chattelevision.ca/">Medicine Hat, Alta.</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKPG-TV">CKPG-TV</a> in <a href="http://www.ckpg.com/">Prince George, B.C.</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFJC-TV">CFJC-TV</a> in <a href="http://www.cfjctv.com/">Kamloops, B.C.</a> - begin <a href="http://www.jimpattison.com/corporate/news/2009/071409.htm">airing programming secured from Rogers</a>. It includes the Price is Right, the Tyra Banks Show and Judge Judy in daytime, and Hell's Kitchen and Law &amp; Order: SVU in primetime.</li>
<li>6pm: <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/25/inside-global-ckmi-46/">Global Quebec</a> CKMI becomes Global Montreal with a rebranded evening newscast after <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/">a CRTC decision this summer</a> allowed them to relicense and accept local advertising. Global Ontario is similarly changing to Global Toronto.</li>
</ul>
<p>Wednesday, Sept. 2</p>
<ul>
<li>1am (10pm in Victoria): <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">CHEK-TV in Victoria goes off the air</span>. See below.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thursday, Sept. 3</p>
<ul>
<li>9pm: Fox airs a repeat of Fringe with <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2009/08/31/fox-twitter.html?ref=fagsteinrules">a live on-screen Twitter stream of commentary</a> from the show's creators</li>
</ul>
<p>Saturday, Sept. 5</p>
<ul>
<li>1am (10pm in Victoria): Canwest's <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Victoria+CHEK+fading+black+tonight+after+year/1946889/story.html">CHEK-TV goes off the air</a>... NOT. <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/05/god-speed-chek-tv/">Canwest has accepted an offer to sell CHEK to its employees</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Monday, Sept. 7</p>
<ul>
<li>5pm: <a href="http://vtele.ca/emissions/dumont360/">Dumont 360</a>, a talk show hosted by former ADQ leader Mario Dumont, premieres on <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">TQS</span> V.</li>
</ul>
<p>Tuesday, Sept. 8</p>
<ul>
<li>5pm: CBC Montreal's <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/newsatsixmontreal/">News at Six</a> ... err, Five ... gets <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/21/michel-godbout-to-leave-cbc-montreal-anchor-chair/">new anchors</a> in Andrew Chang and Jennifer Hall.</li>
</ul>
<p>Wednesday, Sept. 9</p>
<ul>
<li>9pm: Télé-Québec premieres <a href="http://voir.telequebec.tv/">Voir</a>, a show by the people behind the newspaper of the same name.</li>
</ul>
<p>Also of note this week are the 25th anniversaries of <a href="http://heywriterboy.blogspot.com/2009/08/much-ado-but-not-too-much.html">MuchMusic</a> (<a href="http://www.thestar.com/videozone/686323">video</a>, <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090824/muchmusic_anniv_090824/20090828?hub=Entertainment">CP story</a>) and <a href="http://www.thestar.com/sports/article/688571">TSN</a>.</p>
<p>Did I miss anything? Suggest additions below.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/' title='Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations'>Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/' title='CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!'>CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/08/28/montreal-dtv-transition/' title='Even more details about Montreal&#8217;s digital TV transition'>Even more details about Montreal&#8217;s digital TV transition</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/12/03/alouettes-parade-coverage/' title='The Alouettes parade and the two solitudes'>The Alouettes parade and the two solitudes</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/09/dumont-360-it-could-be-worse/' title='Dumont 360: It could be worse'>Dumont 360: It could be worse</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/31/welcome-to-the-new-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CanWest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canwest closes two, sells two, rebrands one After putting the five conventional television stations comprising its secondary E! network (formerly CH) on the block for a "strategic review", the results are in: CHCH Hamilton and CJNT Montreal will be sold to a company called Channel Zero for a grand total of $12. CHBC Kelowna (B.C.) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Canwest closes two, sells two, rebrands one</h4>
<p>After <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/05/canwest-considers-selling-e-cjnt/">putting the five conventional television stations comprising its secondary E! network (formerly CH) on the block for a "strategic review"</a>, the results are in:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHCH-TV">CHCH Hamilton</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJNT-TV">CJNT Montreal</a> will be <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/channel-zero-offers-to-buy-cjnt-chch/">sold to a company called Channel Zero</a> for <a href="http://www.thespec.com/News/Business/article/602322">a grand total of $12</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHBC-TV">CHBC Kelowna</a> (B.C.) will be brought into the Global network as a Global station (its local programming minimums being <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/">dropped from 13.5 hours a week to 7</a> will no doubt be taken advantage of here)</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHEK-TV">CHEK Victoria</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHCA-TV">CHCA Red Deer (Alta.)</a> will close on Aug. 31. CHEK couldn't be turned into a Global station because of a CRTC rule that it not duplicate CHAN in Vancouver. CHCA is right between Calgary and Edmonton, both of which have Global stations.</li>
</ul>
<p>Get the news from your favourite source:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.canwest.com/media/viewNews.asp?NewsroomID=1009">Canwest press release</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/story/2009/07/22/canwest-stations-closed.html">CBC</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/Canwest+Global+closing+CHEK+Victoria/1817374/story.html">Vancouver Sun (focusing on CHEK)</a>, plus <a href="http://www.timescolonist.com/Staff+celebrate+television+years/1817485/story.html">piece from the archives on CHEK history</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gw4BpKY4P3GlWHjtXyi0soE0_W7A">Canadian Press</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The decisions mean the end to the E!/CH network.</p>
<h4>CTV closes one, sells one, keeps one</h4>
<p>Meanwhile, after <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/">Shaw backed away from buying three CTV stations for $1</a>, there is similar mixed news at those stations:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHWI-TV">CHWI Windsor</a> will be kept on the air for at least another year, thanks to an infusion of funding</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKX-TV">CKX Brandon (Man.)</a> will be <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2009/07/16/ctv-brandon.html?ref=rss">sold for $1</a> (<a href="http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/July2009/16/c6860.html">press release</a>) to Bluepoint Investment Corp. (don't ask me who that is), who <a href="http://thechronicleherald.ca/Business/1132924.html">may be looking to buy other TV properties</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKNX-TV">CKNX Wingham (Ont.)</a> will be shut down on Aug. 31 and converted into a retransmitter for CFPL London</li>
</ul>
<p>This leaves six A-channel stations left, including CHWI and the cable-only Atlantic A network.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/08/31/welcome-to-the-new-tv/' title='Welcome to the new TV'>Welcome to the new TV</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/' title='CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!'>CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/' title='Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations'>Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/' title='Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)'>Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/10/03/ckx-shuts-down/' title='CKX, the TV station nobody wanted'>CKX, the TV station nobody wanted</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHOI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CityTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJNT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global-TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, not quite. The CRTC on Monday decided to hike the fee (temporarily, at least) for its Local Programming Improvement Fund from 1% to 1.5% of cable and satellite provider revenues (revenues, not profits), which would give broadcasters an additional $32 million a year ($100 million total in the new fund) to devote to local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not quite.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/news/releases/2009/r090706.htm">The CRTC on Monday decided to hike the fee</a> (temporarily, at least) for its Local Programming Improvement Fund from 1% to 1.5% of cable and satellite provider revenues (revenues, not profits), which would give broadcasters an additional $32 million a year ($100 million total in the new fund) to devote to local programming.</p>
<p>You can see all its arguments in <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-406.htm">the official decision</a>. It's less than the 2.5% that <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2009/06/19/heritage-tv-report.html">a parliamentary committee suggested in June</a>.</p>
<p>It's <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/tv-firms-score-victory-in-fight-over-fees/article1208373/">a victory for broadcasters</a> and <a href="http://www.canada.com/CRTC+hikes+local+programming/1766200/story.html">a defeat for cable and satellite companies</a> (and probably consumers). <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2009/06/c4342.html">CBC is happy</a>. <a href="http://www.canwest.com/media/viewNews.asp?NewsroomID=1002">Canwest is happy</a>. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jO6nSKnfjjwQ1aTjKBC6d3FJwZwg">CTV is happy</a>. <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2009/06/c4311.html">Bell is sad</a>. <a href="http://www.cogeco.ca/export/sites/cogeco/corporate/files/press_releases_en/CRTC_measures_to_support_OTA.pdf">Cogeco is sad (PDF)</a>. <a href="http://www.rogers.com/web/Rogers.portal?_nfpb=true&amp;_windowLabel=investor_1_1&amp;investor_1_1_actionOverride=%2Fportlets%2Fconsumer%2Finvestor%2FshowNewsDetail&amp;investor_1_1yearInSelection=2009&amp;investor_1_1BusiUnit=RCI&amp;investor_1_1NewsID=1707064017&amp;investor_1_1selectedPageIndex=0&amp;investor_1_1fromNewReleasePage=RCI&amp;_pageLabel=IR_LANDING">Rogers is sad</a>. <a href="http://corpo.videotron.com/site/press-room/press-release/349">Videotron is sad</a>. <a href="http://tvfeedsmyfamily.blogspot.com/2009/07/crtc-diverts-more-money-into-local-tv.html">Bill Brioux is annoyed</a>.</p>
<p>Especially when you consider how much the television industry is already subsidized through mandatory fees from cable and satellite companies (now 6.5% of their revenues) and funding from the government, all without us having a say in programming, you have to wonder whether it's all worth it.</p>
<p>Best of all, <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2009/07/07/crtc-local-tv.html">the broadcasters say they need more</a>.</p>
<p>The CRTC also released its conditions of license for one-year renewals for the major networks:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-410.htm">TVA</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-408.htm">Citytv</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-407.htm">CTV</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-409.htm">Global</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Many of the decisions below come from these renewals.</p>
<p>Finally, the CRTC has kicked the fee-for-carriage can (which was <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2009/06/19/heritage-tv-report.html">in turn kicked to them by a parliamentary committee</a>) and other issues down the road to <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-411.htm">a hearing in September</a>, where it will discuss that and other issues affecting broadcast television. The indication, however, is that the CRTC supports a fee-for-carriage idea, provided the fees are negotiated with broadcasters and cable/satellilte companies.</p>
<h4>Harmonized local programming minimums</h4>
<p>And how much more local programming will we be getting for all this extra money? We won't! In fact, we're getting less! Thanks to new "harmonized" minimum requirements, most stations in the country will now have to produce less local programming.</p>
<p>For English-language stations, the minimums will be 14 hours a week for large markets (Toronto, Ottawa, Edmonton, Calgary, Montreal, Vancouver), and seven hours a week for smaller markets (including Halifax, Hamilton and Victoria), with some exceptions. This will mean reductions for CKMI (18 hours a week) and CFCF (15.5 hours a week). Stations with really high requirements might see massive cuts and layoffs. CHCH Hamilton, for example, has dropped from 36.5 hours to only seven, though <a href="../2009/06/30/channel-zero-offers-to-buy-cjnt-chch/">they're going to make a go at more local programming</a>, at least in the short term.</p>
<p>For French-language stations (effectively just TVA since TQS has a special exception), it's on a case-by-case basis:</p>
<ul>
<li>CFCM (Quebec City): 18 hours a week, down from 21</li>
<li>CFER (Rimouski): 5 hours a week, up from 3:10</li>
<li>CJPM (Chicoutimi): 5 hours a week, up from 3:10</li>
<li>CHLT (Sherbrooke): 5 hours a week, up from 3:10</li>
</ul>
<p>Independent stations owned by Radio-Nord (TVA Gatineau) and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%A9l%C3%A9_Inter-Rives">Télé Inter-Rives</a> (SRC/TVA/TQS in Rivière du Loup, TVA in Carleton) maintain their current requirements.</p>
<p>Note that for French markets, only Montreal is larger than a million and is ineligible for LPIF funding.</p>
<p>In the same decision, the CRTC also rejected requests from broadcasters to eliminate requirements for priority programming (expensive dramas) and independent production (as opposed to in-house).</p>
<h4>Global Quebec is now Global Montreal</h4>
<p>After again rejecting union complaints that Global's produced-out-of-Vancouver plan violates local programming requirements for Global Quebec (not saying it wasn't in violation, only that there is "insufficient evidence" and it will "continue to monitor the situation"), the CRTC has approved a request to change CKMI from a Quebec City-based regional station to a local Montreal-based station.</p>
<p>CKMI-TV was once based in our provincial capital, but since it was purchased by Canwest and turned into a Global station it has effectively been headquartered in Montreal, with retransmitters in Quebec City and Sherbrooke (technically, the transmitter was in Quebec with a retransmitter, CKMI-TV-1, in Montreal). Global Quebec was licensed as a regional station, which meant it couldn't take any local Montreal advertising. The license change makes it a local station which opens up that door (as small as it is) and allows the station to compete directly with CFCF and CBMT for local advertising.</p>
<p>A similar move was made for CIII, which is de facto Global's Toronto station but was technically licensed to <a href="http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=paris,+ontario&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;split=0&amp;gl=ca&amp;ei=dbNTSvyzHYuwNojQ8N8I&amp;ll=43.478833,-79.785461&amp;spn=0.862953,2.17804&amp;t=h&amp;z=9">Paris, Ontario</a>, which is west of Hamilton.</p>
<h4>CJNT keeps ethnic minimum</h4>
<p>A request from Canwest to relieve money-losing ethnic station CJNT Montreal of its ethnic programming requirement was denied. Canwest wanted 5 hours a week, but will be stuck at the original 13.5. Since <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/channel-zero-offers-to-buy-cjnt-chch/">the station is being sold</a>, it won't sadden Canwest too much to lose this battle.</p>
<h4>Mandatory digital transition (or not?)</h4>
<p>The CRTC recognized that some broadcasters are lagging behind in transitioning to digital. U.S. broadcasters were forced to make the switch last month (in a deadline that was delayed from February), but Canadians have until August 2011. The CRTC's decision doesn't suggest that this deadline will change for smaller markets (though it suggests perhaps a "hybrid model" may emerge), but it does say it "expects" that major markets will make the transition. It released a list of markets larger than 300,000 it "expects" will do so without complaint, and says it will discuss the issue further in September. The list includes Montréal, Quebec, Trois-Rivières,                              Sherbrooke, Rivière-du-Loup, Saguenay, Ottawa-Gatineau, territorial and provincial capitals and large cities across Canada. Essentially any market with more than one station.</p>
<p>The issue (which also includes whether there should be U.S.-style subsidies for converter boxes) will be dealt with again in September.</p>
<h4>CTV-Shaw rejects get renewed</h4>
<p>Even though <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/">Shaw's offer to buy them has fallen through</a>, the CRTC has renewed licenses for CKX-TV in Brandon, Man., CHWI-TV in Wheatley/Windsor, Ont., and CKNX-TV in Wingham, Ont., for another year, despite CTV's request that they be terminated. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">They're still expected to shut down in August, although <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2009/07/07/crtc-local-tv.html">CTV says it is "reviewing" CHWI</a> in light of the new funding.</span> UPDATE: <a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/Channel+gets+another+year/1771297/story.html">CTV says it will continue operating CHWI until Aug. 31, 2010</a>. CKNX will be converted into a retransmitter, and CKX is still being shut down.<span style="text-decoration: line-through;"><br />
</span></p>
<p>Other CTV stations which had the bare minimum of local programming have been relicensed as strictly retransmitters only:</p>
<ul>
<li>CKCO-TV-3 Oil  								Springs (Sarnia), Ont.</li>
<li>CFRN-TV-3 Whitecourt, Alta.</li>
<li>CFRN-TV-4 Ashmont, Alta.</li>
<li>CFRN-TV-6 Red Deer, Alta.</li>
</ul>
<h4>No copy-copy</h4>
<p>Separate requests from Canwest and Rogers to allow them to duplicate content on E!/Global and City/OMNI respectively were denied by the CRTC. The stations (CHAN-TV Vancouver/CHEK-TV Victoria, CIII-TV Toronto/CHCH-TV Hamilton, and City/OMNI pairings in Toronto, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver) are currently limited to 10% overlap since they are stations with the same owner in the same markets. Requests to be relieved of that restriction were denied.</p>
<h4>City stays special</h4>
<p>In addition to allowing more overlap between City and OMNI, Rogers asked to be allowed to redirect "priority programming" money (money for expensive Canadian dramas) into local programming, and remove an unusual requirement at City to air Canadian feature films. Both were denied. <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/rogers-must-air-100-hours-of-canadian-film-crtc/article1209757/">The Globe has a story</a>.</p>
<h4>CHOI News Talk?</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-405.htm">RNC Media has applied to the CRTC for a license amendment for CHOI-FM in Quebec City</a>, which would change it from an alternative rock format to 50% spoken word. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHOI-FM">CHOI has a rather rocky past with the CRTC</a>.</p>
<h4>Radio was doing OK last year</h4>
<p>The CRTC has <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/news/releases/2009/r090612.htm">released financial statistics</a> of Canadian radio stations (taken as a whole). Looking at <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/BrAnalysis/radio2008/radio1.htm">all of Canada</a> and <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/BrAnalysis/radio2008/radio6.htm">Quebec in particular</a>, the numbers are fairly stable on both sides of the balance sheet. Of particular note is <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/BrAnalysis/radio2008/radio15.htm">AM radio in Quebec</a>, which shows significant losses year after year while the rest of the country just about breaks even.</p>
<h4>Asians Asians Asians!</h4>
<p>Asian Television Network has gotten approval for a slew of new specialty channels:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-361.htm">Hindi Movie Channel</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-362.htm">Hindi Movie Channel Two</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-363.htm">ATN Cricket Channel One</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-364.htm">ATN Cricket Channel Two</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-365.htm">ATN South Asian News - Hindi/English</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-366.htm">ATN South Asian News - English</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-367.htm">ATN South Asian News - Hindi</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-368.htm">ATN Music Network One (Hindi Music)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-369.htm">ATN Music Netowrk Two (Hindi Music)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-370.htm">ATN Asian Sports Network</a> (English coverage of cricket, ball hockey, badminton)</li>
</ul>
<p>Another two networks - <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-371.htm">ATN Multicultural Channel</a> and <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-372.htm">Commonwealth Broadcasting Network</a> - were denied, as their nature was judged to be too broad for a specialty service.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2009/07/c4631.html">ATN announced on Tuesday</a> that nine channels, including some of the ones above, will premiere on Rogers Cable in the fall. The channels are being renamed to more interesting names.</p>
<h4>CHEAR!</h4>
<p>Ultimate Indie Productions has received authorization to start a specialty channel devoted to emerging Canadian Artists called <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-359.htm">CHEAR!</a> (and <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-360.htm">CHEAR! HD</a>)</p>
<h4>Ashes to ashes, SCREAM to DUSK</h4>
<p>Corus is <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/June2009/26/c2308.html">rebranding its SCREAM! horror channel to DUSK</a>, and expanding its niche to include "paranormal" and "supernatural" stuff that might not be so scary. I guess this means more X-Files? The change takes effect on Sept. 9 (09/09/09, as if that's scary or paranormal or something).</p>
<h4>In other news</h4>
<ul>
<li>TVA got a slap on the wrist (hell, not even that) for failing to meet expectations regarding airing of Canadian films and closed-captioning. The CRTC "expects" they'll meet those requirements in the future, or else they're going to get a sternly-worded letter, I guess.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/al-jazeera-coming-to-canadian-tv/article1200118/">The Globe and Mail is reporting</a> that Al-Jazeera English may be close to approval as a specialty channel.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-390.htm">CPAC has gotten approval</a> for a license amendment that would allow it to broadcast non-CPAC-sounding stuff like music on Canada Day every year. Now it can let loose in an explosion of patriotism on July 1.</li>
<li>Vision TV has given up and is <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2009/06/c4267.html">now asking viewers to figure out its programming</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-405.htm">Cogeco has asked to move its transmitter for CFGE-FM</a> (Rhythme FM) in Sherbrooke and increase its transmitter power to improve reception.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-399.htm">MusiquePlus has gotten authorization</a> to hand over its 3.4% of revenues required for the production of Canadian music videos to MaxFACT instead of VideoFACT. The difference is mainly that MaxFACT is what MusiMax gives its money to and this would simplify things for them. The request got an intervention from ADISQ which was concerned that there would be less money for youth-oriented music videos as well as those from Quebec anglophones. MusiquePlus responded that it has no control over the procedures used by MaxFACT to allocate it money.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-391.htm">The CRTC is mad at CHRC in St. Catharines</a> for violating a number of conditions of its license. There is, of course, no actual penalty associated with such violations as long as you promise not to do it again.</li>
<li>The Canadian Broadcast Standards Council has <a href="http://www.cbsc.ca/english/decisions/2009/090617.php">dismissed a complaint against CJMF-FM in Quebec City</a> regarding a promotion related to driving while on a cellphone. The CBSC concluded that the station was not, in fact, advocating that people drive while illegally talking on a cellphone without a hands-free device.</li>
</ul>
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/' title='Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations'>Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/' title='Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)'>Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/08/28/montreal-dtv-transition/' title='Even more details about Montreal&#8217;s digital TV transition'>Even more details about Montreal&#8217;s digital TV transition</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/10/23/fee-for-carriage-stupidity/' title='A dose of reality in the TV debate'>A dose of reality in the TV debate</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/15/global-cbc-join-ctvs-save-local-tv-campaign/' title='Global, CBC join CTV&#8217;s &#8220;Save Local TV&#8221; campaign'>Global, CBC join CTV&#8217;s &#8220;Save Local TV&#8221; campaign</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, remember a couple of months ago when Shaw said it would buy three endangered CTV-owned stations for $1 each in what seemed like the most insincere offer in the history of mankind? Yeah, turns out it was a giant bluff. After going over the books for the three stations, Shaw determined that they are, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, remember a couple of months ago when <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/">Shaw said it would buy three endangered CTV-owned stations for $1 each</a> in what seemed like the most insincere offer in the history of mankind?</p>
<p>Yeah, turns out it was a giant bluff. After going over the books for the three stations, Shaw determined that they are, indeed, losing quite a bit of money and it's not worth the CRTC brownie points and good PR to sink more cash into the stations. <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/June2009/30/c3321.html">CTV issued a brief statement</a> Tuesday afternoon saying Shaw reneged. <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/shaw-cancels-deal-for-3-ctv-stations/article1202528/">Media</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5h4NQTXntLsr7I6O23muBlAHiNE6A">outlets</a> have repeated the statement, but Shaw and CTV aren't commenting further yet, and <a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/Shaw+backs+purchasing+Windsor+Channel/1748148/story.html">the stations can't comment</a> because they don't know what's going on.</p>
<p>This comes (coincidentally?) on the same day Canwest announced <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/channel-zero-offers-to-buy-cjnt-chch/">it will offload two stations onto Channel Zero</a>.</p>
<p>So <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKX-TV">CKX-TV</a> in Brandon, Man., <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHWI-TV">CHWI-TV</a> in Wheatley (Windsor), Ont., and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKNX-TV">CKNX-TV</a> in Wingham, Ont., go back to being endangered and unless another buyer can be lined up they won't last past the summer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/News/sale+channel+moves+forward/1566481/story.html">The optimism they had when the deal was announced</a> now flies right out the window.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Canadian Press is the only outlet that <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iWZ2E13CKGCkACZs4Ew9vl2BY0uQ">finally tracks Shaw down to get comment</a>. They say they expected real television stations but saw hollowed-out shells where much of the work was done in London and Toronto. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/Channel+gets+another+year/1771297/story.html">CTV says it will keep CHWI running for another year</a> after <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/">getting more money from the CRTC</a>.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/' title='CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!'>CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/' title='Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)'>Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/' title='Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations'>Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/25/ctv-to-shut-down-two-stations/' title='CTV to shut down two stations'>CTV to shut down two stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/10/03/ckx-shuts-down/' title='CKX, the TV station nobody wanted'>CKX, the TV station nobody wanted</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTVglobemedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post has been updated. See below. I feel bad for the people at three television stations: CKX-TV in Brandon, Man., CHWI-TV in Wheatley (Windsor), Ont., and CKNX-TV in Wingham, Ont. The background In February, CKX found out that owner CTVglobemedia was putting it up for sale. The station is actually a private CBC affiliate, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This post has been updated.</em> See below.</p>
<p>I feel bad for the people at three television stations: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKX-TV">CKX-TV</a> in Brandon, Man., <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHWI-TV">CHWI-TV</a> in Wheatley (Windsor), Ont., and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKNX-TV">CKNX-TV</a> in Wingham, Ont.</p>
<p><span id="more-5289"></span></p>
<h4>The background</h4>
<p>In February, CKX found out that owner CTVglobemedia was putting it up for sale. The station is actually a private CBC affiliate, running mainly CBC programming, but the CBC decided not to renew its affiliation agreement which sees the public broadcaster pay the station to air its programming. So CTV offered to sell the station to CBC for the nominal price of $1. CBC refused, because the cost of operating the station outweighs its potential for earnings or its usefulness. Without someone to take it over, the station would be shut down.</p>
<p>At CHWI and CKNX, both underperforming A-Channel stations in southern Ontario, it was the same deal. CTV would not renew their license, and <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/25/ctv-to-shut-down-two-stations/">the stations would be shut down</a> when their current licenses expire in August.</p>
<p>Although I don't doubt that these stations were losing money, there was also a political reason for pulling the plug. CTV was about to step in front of the CRTC and ask for a third time that it require cable and satellite distributors to pay conventional broadcasters to carry their over-the-air signals. The argument is that the advertising model for conventional TV is broken, mainly because of the proliferation of specialty cable channels who get advertising and subscriber fees, and don't have to produce local programming.</p>
<p>Announcing that it would close these stations was a "See what you're doing?" move intended to be an example for what could happen across the network if the CRTC refused.</p>
<p>Similarly, Canwest Global (my employer) said it was looking at "<a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/05/canwest-considers-selling-e-cjnt/">exploring strategic options</a>" for its secondary E! network, which includes Montreal's ethnic station CJNT. That's managementese for "they're up for sale," though it wasn't a firm commitment to sell or shut down.</p>
<p>The fact that these both involve secondary network stations, which tend to get second-rate U.S. programming, isn't a coincidence.</p>
<p>Some communities have taken it upon themselves to save their stations. In southwestern Ontario, <a href="http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Local/2009/04/30/9298211-sun.html">rallies are planned</a> to convince CTV to change its mind. In Hamilton, <a href="http://www.savechch.com/">a "Save CHCH" campaign </a>that would put the E! station in community hands.</p>
<p>Cable and satellite providers, meanwhile, aren't crazy about this fee-for-carriage idea. In a bid to get consumers on their side, they say they'd just pass the fees on to them instead of eating in to their record profits. They also argue that conventional television broadcasters are exaggerating their financial situation, which they argue will recover when the current recession ends.</p>
<h4>Shaw's move</h4>
<p>So on Thursday, <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/transcripts/2009/tb0430.html">CTV's Ivan Fecan was before the CRTC</a> using these three stations as examples of how the conventional television model was broken, adding that it might reconsider closing CHWI-TV if additional money were to come through.</p>
<p>Shaw Communications (which owns <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJBN-TV">a single television broadcasting station</a> but more importantly a large cable company and the direct-to-home satellite network StarChoice) decided that it would try to shut CTV up by offering to buy the stations for $1 each.</p>
<p>As part of the move, Shaw bought a full-page ad in Friday's Globe and Mail to make its case:</p>
<div id="attachment_5291" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5291" title="Shaw ad" src="http://blog.fagstein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/shaw-ad.png" alt="Shaw ad in the Globe and Mail (May 1, 2009, Page A6)" width="600" height="1119" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Shaw ad in the Globe and Mail (May 1, 2009, Page A6)</p></div>
<p>It certainly doesn't mince words. Not only does it repeat the "hostage" and "ransom" metaphors, it bolds them.</p>
<p>Of course, the ad is misleading in two ways:</p>
<ul>
<li>This would not be a direct tax on consumers. It would be a direct tax on Shaw. It would be an <em>indirect</em> tax on consumers if Shaw chose to make it that way.</li>
<li>Shaw's contribution to Canadian programming is not by choice. As a satellite provider, it's required to contribute to the Canadian Television Fund and to a community service.</li>
</ul>
<h4>CTV's response</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090501.RCRTC01ART1941/TPStory/Business">The Globe interviewed Shaw</a> (who said its offer was genuine), and CTV got wind of the plan somehow (either because the Globe asked it for comment, because Shaw let CTV know of the offer or because CTVglobemedia owns the Globe and the advertisement was shown to head office). So it immediately agreed to the sale, took out a half-page response ad facing Shaw's and hastily put this together:</p>
<div id="attachment_5290" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 460px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5290" title="CTV ad" src="http://blog.fagstein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/ctv-ad.png" alt="CTV ad in the Globe and Mail (May 1, 2009, Page A7)" width="450" height="438" /><p class="wp-caption-text">CTV ad in the Globe and Mail (May 1, 2009, Page A7)</p></div>
<p>Well, OK. I guess that makes it official. Though both sides will have to sign contracts and get approval from the CRTC for the change in ownership.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2009/30/c7266.html">a press release issued at the same time</a>, CTV CEO Ivan Fecan was similarly sarcastic:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I think it's great. We've accepted their offer of $1 per station. Cable is rolling in money and can obviously afford to underwrite the losses. Good for them. I'm sure they will live up to the existing conditions of licence placed on these stations which is wonderful news for the employees and for the people of Windsor, Wingham and Brandon."</p></blockquote>
<p>And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how three Canadian television stations were sold though sarcastic press releases and mean-spirited newspaper advertisements.</p>
<p>Shaw says the same offer is on the table for Canwest's five E! stations, including CJNT. But <a href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/markets/headline_news/article.jsp?content=b01771615">Canwest says Shaw hasn't talked to them directly</a>.</p>
<h4>A genuine offer?</h4>
<p>So there is rejoicing in <a href="http://www2.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=cb1de54e-bdab-43db-b681-f2fdb0ad40ae">Windsor</a> and <a href="http://www.brandonsun.com/story.php?story_id=134003">Brandon</a> (subscription link), though they're not quite sure what to think of it all.</p>
<p>After all, Shaw could have stepped up two months ago, but it didn't. Shaw has no interest in running TV stations. It just wants to embarrass CTV and Global and convince the CRTC not to approve fee-for-carriage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5hKcjFyx_eWnqtdLIG4geM7HItfcw">Canadian Press analyzes the move</a>, which it says could be a win-win if Shaw succeeds at creating a lean operation that draws a modest profit.<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090502.RDECLOET02ART1944/TPStory/TPBusiness/?page=rss&amp;id=GAM.20090502.RDECLOET02ART1944"> The Globe and Mail's Derek DeCloet also suggests that this move is a transparently ungenuine one</a> solely designed to ward off more expensive carriage fees.</p>
<p>Anything is better than a shutdown, and an acquisition by Shaw is a mild decentralization of broadcast television. So even though there will be inevitable layoffs, there is hope for these communities.</p>
<p>I just wish these stations, and the dozens of jobs they represent, weren't tossed around angrily like worthless pawns in a high-stakes game of media chess.</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090502.RTV02ART1940/TPStory/TPBusiness/?page=rss&amp;id=GAM.20090502.RTV02ART1940">The Globe reports</a> that neither CTV nor Canwest have received so much as a phone call from Shaw.</p>
<p>UPDATE (June 30): Two months later, CTV announces that <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/June2009/30/c3321.html">Shaw will not, in fact, buy their stations</a>. So it was all a giant bluff after all.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/' title='CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!'>CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/' title='Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations'>Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/' title='Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations'>Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/25/ctv-to-shut-down-two-stations/' title='CTV to shut down two stations'>CTV to shut down two stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/02/12/shaw-to-buy-canwest/' title='Shaw to buy Canwest'>Shaw to buy Canwest</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CTV to shut down two stations</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/25/ctv-to-shut-down-two-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/25/ctv-to-shut-down-two-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=4315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE (May 1): SOLD! And so it begins. CTV announced today it is not applying for license renewals for two small-market 'A' network stations: CKNX-TV in Wingham, Ont., and CHWI-TV in Wheatley, Ont. (which serves Windsor). This comes a week after CTV said it would not renew the license of CKX-TV in Brandon, which is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE (May 1): <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/">SOLD!</a></p>
<p>And so it begins. <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2009/25/c3691.html">CTV announced today</a> it is not applying for license renewals for two small-market 'A' network stations: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKNX-TV">CKNX-TV</a> in Wingham, Ont., and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHWI-TV">CHWI-TV</a> in Wheatley, Ont. (which serves Windsor).</p>
<p>This comes a week after <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2009/19/c2188.html">CTV said it would not renew the license of CKX-TV in Brandon</a>, which is actually a CBC affiliate and carriest mostly CBC programming in primetime.</p>
<p>A whackload of broadcast stations from CTV and Global have licenses up for renewal this year. Not only is the media meltdown hurting their bottom lines (or, more accurately, their creditors) and the world economic crisis making it worse, but with <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/01/09/analog-tv-shutdown-is-a-mistake/">a forced switchover to digital broadcasting in 2011</a>, this is the ideal time to decide to throw in the towel for small-market stations rather than start investing in new transmitters.</p>
<p>In its press release, CTV implicitly blames the CRTC's decision to <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/11/03/broadcasting-regulation-nerdgasm/">turn down their money-grab</a> for their decision to shut down the station. It also sounds like the network hopes this will prompt the CRTC to change its mind.</p>
<div id="attachment_4316" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 500px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4316" title="CTV/A Southern Ontario" src="http://blog.fagstein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ctv-so.png" alt="CTV-owned stations in southern Ontario: CTV (blue), A (green) and the two stations being shut down (red)" width="490" height="344" /><p class="wp-caption-text">CTV-owned stations in southern Ontario: CTV (blue), A (green) and the two stations being shut down (red)</p></div>
<p>Local news is expected to be taken up by London's A station and Kitchener's CTV station. It's unclear if the transmitters themselves would be shut down or converted into rebroadcasters.</p>
<p>It remains to be seen if similar fates will hit <a href="http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/05/canwest-considers-selling-e-cjnt/">Canwest's E! secondary network</a>, which still doesn't have a buyer.</p>
<p>More coverage from <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iPtX7M2YdDpZ7yFr4VFBsM2iuh1A">CP</a>, <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/02/25/ctvstatsions.html">CBC</a>, <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1328263">Canwest</a>, <a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/Entertainment/Channel+closing+Windsor+operation/1328198/story.html">Windsor Star</a>, <a href="http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/Business/2009/02/25/8530911.html">London Free Press</a>, <a href="http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE51O6SV20090225">Reuters</a> and <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090226.RCTV26/TPStory/TPNational/?page=rss&amp;id=GAM.20090226.RCTV26">the Globe and Mail</a>.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/07/crtc-roundup-lpif/' title='CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!'>CRTC Roundup: They saved local TV!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/' title='Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations'>Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/' title='Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)'>Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2011/05/31/ctv-two/' title='CTV Two: The second-rate brand'>CTV Two: The second-rate brand</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/07/22/global-ctv-small-stations/' title='Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations'>Mixed news at small Global, CTV stations</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/02/25/ctv-to-shut-down-two-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

