From the latest episode of URLER.TV, a video interview with a guy who goes around the city, checks recycling bins for empty water bottles, then leaves a pamphlet making them feel guilty about ruining the environment by buying bottled water.
The lesson is obvious: Don't recycle your water bottles; put them straight into the trash.
CBC's Archives, which has good stuff but unfortunately encodes it using Windows Media, which I have to play using my choppy, buggy Quicktime plugin instead of a universal Flash player, has found archival footage of the five party leaders. As you can see, they have wacky hairstyles (Duceppe's mullet being the most awesome) and big glasses and stuff.
Dion, Harper and Duceppe are all from the same turbulent early 90s era. Dion a political scientist commenting on the Charlottetown Accord pre-referendum. Harper from when he was a Reform Party wonk and before he was elected an MP, and Duceppe after he was elected in a by-election as the first Bloc Québécois MP (and the whole he-swore-an-oath-to-the-Queen controversy).
Layton is from a decade earlier, when he was elected in a surprise upset to Toronto City Council.
But the most interesting clip is of Elizabeth May, 30 years ago in 1978. It's actually a feature piece for The Fifth Estate, about a debate in Nova Scotia on whether to spray the forest with insecticide to fight the spruce budworm which was devastating forests. Forestry executives were for it, wanting to protect their trees and fearing an epidemic. May was against it, saying the spray had health risks associated with it.
Curious, I looked up the Wikipedia article to see what happened with the whole debate. It seems the infestation died out on its own, as May predicted, and an environmentally-friendly insecticide was created to deal with the problem as well.
Which of the following green-coloured products are made using recycled paper or make any other claims toward environmental sustainability?
The answer, of course, is none. They're just green-coloured.
That's the problem with greenwashing. There is no standard body to say what environmentally-friendly claims can be made and which ones can't. And even if there were such a body with strictly-enforced rules, nothing prevents a company from simply using green-coloured packaging to subtly fool consumers into thinking that there is an environmental benefit to choosing a green product over a non-green version.
What's the difference between these two products? They're both from the same company, both weigh the same and are made from the same material. The difference, if you look at the numbers at the bottom, is that the green-coloured package has sheets that are half the size as those the blue-coloured package, and offsets that by having twice as many sheets.
In other words, the only difference between the two is that the one on the left has twice as many perforations. And yet there's a sense that, because it's green, it's better for the environment somehow.
The one product on the shelves that does make green claims is this jumbo package of paper towels from President's Choice. The paper towels here are printed on made using recycled paper, and I believe once you throw them away will explode into butterflies or something.
Whose bright idea was it to associate such a complicated, easily-abused marketing concept with little more than a colour?
The city of Hampstead has apparently decided that outdoor clotheslines are still too ghetto to be allowed back into their perfect little white-ass town.
But don't worry. The mayor is advising environmentally-conscious citizens to (wink, wink) break the by-law which specifically bans their use.
That makes perfect sense.
Somehow, despite working 42 hours this week, I managed to put together another bluffer's guide, for the Liberal carbon tax plan. Liberal leader Stéphane Dion calls it Green Shift, which I guess is not to be confused with this Green Shift. From the video, it seems to have something to do with stock photos of plants and animals, combined with people in suits clapping awkwardly in a white room.
The 48-page plan (PDF), which ironically wastes quite a bit of space by having blank pages and one-word all-green title pages, explains far more details than non-Liberal politicians would have liked, because now they can't attack Dion for being unclear.
That doesn't mean they won't attack the Liberals though. The Tories have already setup a they-think-it's-funny website mocking Dion and his plan, saying everyone but the tooth fairy and leprechauns will have to pay more taxes as a result of it.
Basically all you need to know about the plan is this:
I'm glad to hear that the global warming/energy crisis has been solved, and local businesses can go back to cranking up the air conditioning full blast and throwing open their doors so they can cool the sidewalk in front of their stores.
I'm not sure what's more outrageous: the fact that this happens, or the fact that consumers fall for it and/or don't care enough to protest.
Not to mention the fact that air conditioners displace heat, so for all the air that's cooled in front of a store, hot air in the back is heated even further. The result is a net increase in heat that just makes hot days in the city even hotter.
So as I was taking a short break from doing my job yesterday, I downloaded this report that everyone's talking about, in its original French. I expected a long report taking up far more paper than is necessary, and I wasn't disappointed.
But I noticed something on one of the pages of the report:
I thought that was funny because the report had so many blank pages in it, to serve as bookends for the title pages. I did a quick count of the blank pages and mentioned to my boss that of the 310 pages in the report, 34 were entirely blank (not a single dot of ink).
She asked me to give her a couple of paragraphs saying that, and it turned into the shortest article I've ever written, in today's paper. (It was a bit longer than that to begin with, but it was cut down for space, and also because it went on a bit too long, by a ruthless copy editor who ironically turned out to be myself).
Admittedly, both the environmental policies and the blank pages are common practice in government reports. The Johnson Commission report (PDF) has a similar notice (though it actually calculates how much of the planet you're saving), and also has blank pages (though not as many).
Without the blank pages and title pages (including pages that repeat the title page or just include photos of the commission chairs, but not including the environmental/copyright notice above which is on an otherwise blank page), the Bouchard-Taylor report would have 60 fewer pages, for a 19% reduction in paper use.
Wouldn't that have been better for the environment?
My evil misunderstood overlords at The Gazette have launched two new blogs this week, bringing its total to 1,425:
Stage and Page, which I have to admit is a kind of catchy title, is the blog of new "culture critic" Pat Donnelly. Formerly the books columnist, she's taken over Matt Radz's theatre beat as well, bringing herself to a level of cultural aptitude that simply puts the rest of us to shame.
Green Life, by reporters Monique Beaudin and Michelle Lalonde, is the environment blog, which was launched last Tuesday as part of the whole Earth Day thing. It's part of a larger "website" devoted to environment issues. There will also be a weekly column on the environment on Mondays (including a big splash in today's Arts & Life section on reducing your carbon footprint in 12 easy steps). The column will alternate between the two as they teach us new and disgusting ways to make us greener.
(UPDATE - April 30):
Showbiz Chez Nous, by Brendan Kelly, follows the same subject matter as his weekly column: TV and movies in Quebec.
Editor and Publisher has a short article (via J-Source) about The Gazette's Green Report Card, in which the newspaper looks at its own environmental impact and comes up with some sobering results (they use a lot of paper). E&P calls it "groundbreaking," which makes me wonder what took them so long: the report was published in April.
I realize magazines have long lead times between writing and publishing, but this is kind of silly.
Anyway, the report is still worth reading, if only for its surprisingly honest self-assessment.
Recent bookmarks
