Kate McDonnell, author of the much-read Montreal City Weblog, does her yearly anniversary post and writes about how local media has changed since her blog was launched in 2001. A recommended read for people interested in the local media scene (like me).
Some thoughts to add:
Major local media have all redesigned their websites multiple times since 2001. Most now copy each other (much like print newspaper layouts copy each other), their homepages excessively long, far too much focus on Javascript, Flash and throwing as many links as possible into a tiny space. The idea of the Internet portal died a long time ago, but many still concentrate on the homepage as the single point of entry.
I don't own an iPhone, and I use my cellphone strictly for making calls (and sending text messages), so I can't comment on mobile offerings. But it would be nice if content-providing websites would open up their content a bit and let us make it work with our devices. Force us to go to your page for the full article if you're worried about page impressions, but let us spread the technology to better connect those pages with the people who want to see them.
At some point in the future, the idea of paying for wire copy will be considered ridiculous. It made sense for newspapers. It doesn't make sense online. Sure, keep your Canadian Press subscriptions for now, but at least separate the copy-paste wire dreck from original content your journalists create. Don't lump it all into one feed and put it all on one page.
Local media need to hire more programmers and geeks. Even with all the advances there is still so much inefficiency when it comes to news websites and how journalists and editors perform their craft.
For many people, Twitter is replacing the RSS feed. That can be both good and bad. But a lot of people just use Twitter to replicate their RSS feed. That's just bad. If I want to follow your feed, I'll do it in Google Reader, instead of getting a truncated headline and bit.ly link. If I see "via twitterfeed" on your Twitter page, I won't be following.
I can't help but agree about the "old arts weeklies". I don't read Voir much (Steve Proulx excepted), but my interest in the two anglo weeklies has diminished considerably. I thought it was because they focused less on news and more on arts, but I think they're falling behind in both categories, going through the motions instead of spending effort coming up with something new. I find I get more interesting news from The Suburban than Hour or Mirror, and that's not saying much.
As for Metro, Transcontinental's free daily, it has improved a lot since its launch in 2001, when it was exclusively wire copy. Now it has actual journalists. They're not doing groundbreaking investigative reporting, but considering their budget it's surprising the amount of original local content they get in. I'm not sure how much of their recent quality is based on competition with 24 Heures, whose journalists seem to exist right now solely to provide filler for the locked out Journal de Montréal, though. That might change if that labour conflict is ever solved.
Which brings us to Rue Frontenac, which has been working hard, but doesn't look like the kind of website that needs 253 people to put together. Obviously people have other responsibilities like picketing, and not all of those employees are journalists, but the small core of people putting out most of the stuff at that website is arguably exactly what the Journal and Quebecor want.
Finally, as far as local bloggers are concerned, well, that's the subject of another post.
Oh, and Kate, maybe it's time to install WordPress and start allowing comments on that blog. That way I don't have to write a response on my own blog to get it published.
