<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fagstein &#187; Shaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fagstein.com/tag/shaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fagstein.com</link>
	<description>Can you think of a better name?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shaw to buy Canwest</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/02/12/shaw-to-buy-canwest/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/02/12/shaw-to-buy-canwest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CanWest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=8418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big change for one half of the Canwest empire now has a roadmap: Canwest announced this morning that Shaw Communications would buy a 20% equity interest and 80% controlling interest in Canwest Global once the company emerges from creditor protection. Coverage at The Globe and Mail (of course, with analysis and more analysis), CBC, Reuters, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2010/02/12/shaw-to-buy-canwest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaw renegs on promise to save TV stations</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=6089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, remember a couple of months ago when Shaw said it would buy three endangered CTV-owned stations for $1 each in what seemed like the most insincere offer in the history of mankind? Yeah, turns out it was a giant bluff. After going over the books for the three stations, Shaw determined that they are, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/06/30/shaw-wont-buy-ctv-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rogers et al pissed at CTV &#8220;Save Local Television&#8221; campaign</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/23/rogers-complaint-re-ctv-save-local-television/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/23/rogers-complaint-re-ctv-save-local-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 04:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee-for-carriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven't caught CTV's "Save Local Television" ads recently, you haven't been watching television. CTV has blanketed its stations, the A television network as well as specialty channels like the Comedy Network and Space with these advertisements that predict a doomsday scenario for local television and demonize the cable and satellite companies for "taking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/23/rogers-complaint-re-ctv-save-local-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worthless stations sold sarcastically for $1 (UPDATE: NOT!)</title>
		<link>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHWI-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKNX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CKX-TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTVglobemedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fagstein.com/?p=5289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post has been updated. See below. I feel bad for the people at three television stations: CKX-TV in Brandon, Man., CHWI-TV in Wheatley (Windsor), Ont., and CKNX-TV in Wingham, Ont. The background In February, CKX found out that owner CTVglobemedia was putting it up for sale. The station is actually a private CBC affiliate, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fagstein.com/2009/05/02/worthless-stations-sold-sarcastically-for-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
