It’s hard to think of an organization more anal-retentive about its trademarks than the International Olympic Committee (and, by extension, the organizing committees for the various Olympic Games). It’s bad enough nobody can use the word “Olympic” without getting angry letters from their lawyers, but now it seems they’re going a bit far, even by their own insane standards.
Take Richard Giles, who went to the Beijing Games last year and posted photos to Flickr under a Creative Commons license. That got a cease and desist letter from the IOC, who argued that the license was too generous, and allowed people to use his images for commercial purposes, which would violate the IOC’s copyrights. Even though he took the images, simply being at an Olympic event meant the IOC had a say in how he used his photos.
Or that Free Tibet protest video that was yanked off of YouTube because the group parodied the Olympic rings logo (in one case, using handcuffs). Or the Chicago Olympic bid logo that had to be changed because it contained a torch.
It’s not just the IOC. The City of Vancouver has raised the ire of civil liberties groups with a new bylaw that would make it easier for them to take down “illegal” signs (those that, say, use the Olympic logo without permission to cash in on the Games) and fine the perpetrators.
These things have already been subject to condemnation in editorials, but now it seems the message isn’t getting through.
The reason for all this, of course, is money. The Olympics are big business, TV networks spend hundred of millions of dollars on broadcast rights, and sponsors pay big money to be able to claim that they support our athletes.
That’s why there are a ridiculous amount of official suppliers for these Games. These include an official home improvement partner (Rona), an official lottery and gaming provider (B.C. Lottery Commission, who I guess aren’t concerned with how this might look), an official motor vehicle insurance company (ICBC), an official document solutions provider (Ricoh), an official medal metal supplier (Teck Resources, which is different from the official medal manufacturer, the Royal Canadian Mint), an official supplier of industrial safety and material handling equipment (Acklands Grainger), an official temperature control system supplier (Aggreko), an official hand sanitizer dispenser supplier (ALDA Pharmaceuticals), an official supplier of insulation materials and heat transfer fluids (Dow Canada), an official water management supplier (EPCOR), an official metal detector supplier (Garrett Metal Detectors), an official cereal supplier (General Mills), an official converged network equipment supplier (Nortel), an official network server supplier (Sun Microsystems of Canada), and an official natural gas pipeline operator (TransCanada).
There are also “media” suppliers, official partners that get to put the Olympic logo on their mastheads until the end of the Games. These include 19 official newspapers in Canada: the Globe and Mail is the official national print newspaper, the Canwest chain gets all 10 of its regional newspapers (including The Gazette) in the regional newspaper category, and Gesca gets its eight papers (including La Presse) in the French newspaper category.
I’m starting to think I should take down that image at the top of this post. VANOC will get mad at me for using the logos, and the category I’ve suggested might just be one that they were expecting bids for.
The IOC come off as an arrogant bunch of privileged bureaucrats.
Hope one day they will light up. We are in the era of social media and Web 2.0. Informations, comments, opinions and facts travel digitally at the speed of light. Literally too.
I think we need a change of guard at the top level of all these centuries old organisations like IOC, Academie Francaise or Formula one, to name a few. Those organisations were born at the most in the last century with leaders who have cultural roots in the 19th century. The “younger” ones like Max Mosley in the “good ol’ times of the 30’s nazism”. What an arse!
We are in need of freshening up those old minds and dusting some old desks.
Fat chance. This is the IOC, and whichever city wins the bid ends up signing over its soul.
You know why Starbucks bought Second Cup? Because Second Cup won the bid to become the Official Olympic Coffee shop. Which means that every non-Second Cup coffee shop in the designated-olympic-area would have had to paper over its signs for the duration of the Olympics and the Paralympics.
Er, I don’t know where you got that from, but Starbucks doesn’t own Second Cup. Rather, it’s the Second Cup Income Fund that owns it http://www.secondcupincomefund.com/
I stand corrected. I must have made up the whole thing in a contact-induced haze.
Except Second Cup isn’t owned by Starbucks.
They think they own the name Olymipics?
I think a country called Greece should be receiving a royalty cheque for everytime the word/name Olympics is used then. What a farce. Nobody really cares about this bloated full of crap games. It died several times in the past 2500 yrs or so. Until some retarded french guy thought he discovered something (again). Now they think they own the name and torch image! Ya right!
I heard a commercial for the bedding company, Dormez-Vous. Apparently they are the official supplier of mattresses to Olympic Village. Every Olympic athelete, according to the commercial, will get a good night’s sleep on a mattress from Dormez-Vous! Talk about getting into bed with your sponsors!
Actually, the official mattress (and other bedding) sponsor is Sleep Country Canada, and Dormez-Vous is a subsidiary of that company.
Did the Consortium post a notice in your workplace indicating they had applied to violate, err, obtain an exemption from the labour laws for people covering the Olympic Games?
Only at the Olympics you say…
The Only Coffee at all Vanoc Olympic venues will be the ‘Far Coast’ brand marketed by Coca Cola. A coup by Coca Cola – No Starbucks or Second Cup or anything local. Try to find Far Coast anywhere else.