5 thoughts on “On the improtance of copy editing”

1. DAVE ID January 9, 2008 at 12:51 pm

   Woe nice catch!

   Reply ↓
2. Bill D. January 9, 2008 at 10:48 pm

   ‘Improtance’?

   A deliberate error, no doubt? :^)

   Reply ↓
3. Fagstein Post authorJanuary 9, 2008 at 10:55 pm

   I see no error there. My spelling is prefect.

   Reply ↓
4. DAVE ID January 9, 2008 at 10:57 pm

   Yes it is Ford

   Reply ↓
5. princess iveylocks January 10, 2008 at 12:38 am

   Now I understand why Cinema Studies falls under the FIMS department here at Westernalia.

   Reply ↓