In October, you’ll recall Global TV announced a major overhaul of its local news outlets. As part of the plan, sets would be demolished, staff would be laid off and instead of a proper studio, local anchors would deliver the news in front of green screens to cameras controlled remotely out of Vancouver. Story packages would be shipped off electronically to a centralized news processing centre, and virtually all the production would be taken out of the hands of local workers. (The results, of course, left much to be desired)
At the time, Global reassured local viewers that their broadcasts would still be local:
News staff in each market will continue to generate local content. All content will be delivered to a Broadcast Centre and packaged into a program format for air. Local anchors will continue to deliver the news from their local stations.
Well, apparently that’s not quite the case anymore. Because being in front of a green screen means you can pretend to be almost anywhere, Global is exploiting this to make its news anchors pretend to be in places they’re not.
Hannah Thibedeau anchors Global Quebec's evening news from who knows where
The three of you still tuning into Global Quebec’s evening local newscast might notice some unfamiliar faces on your screen. Hannah Boudreau Thibedeau is anchoring the 6pm newscast for what I’ll assume is a vacationing Jamie Orchard. Except Thibedeau isn’t part of the Global Quebec team, she’s Global’s Parliament Hill correspondent based out of Ottawa.
But that’s not conclusive proof. She could have driven into town to fill in, the local staff stretched too much as it is with summer vacations and all.
Anthony Farnell doing Global Quebec's local forecast
More conclusive is weatherman Anthony Farnell, since on the same day he appears on both Global Quebec’s local newscast (above) and Global Ontario’s local newscast (below).
Anthony Farnell does Global Ontario's local forecast
Unless he has a special helicopter to shuttle him back and forth between Montreal and Toronto, he’s clearly doing both weathercasts from the same location, in front of the same green screen.
That in itself isn’t too much of an issue. I mean, any idiot can do the weather.
The problem is that he’s being dishonest about it. In both newscasts he uses the word “we,” as in “we are going to see heavy rain over the next couple of days.” For the Quebec newscast, he cut to clips of Montreal traffic. And yet nowhere is it mentioned that he’s doing this newscast from a green screen in Toronto.
Lying about your location goes well beyond the usual fakery we see on TV news. It’s dishonest an unacceptable from an organization that is supposed to be trustworthy about bringing the truth to its audience.
It’s hard being the No. 3 newscast for a community of only a few hundred thousands anglophones. The fact that nobody watches the newscast does justify cost-cutting (though that only continues the hopeless ratings death spiral). But you have to be honest about it. Level with your viewers, explain the reasons behind your decisions and even if they don’t like it, they’ll at least understand.
Saving money by lying to people is just one step above fraud.
The three of you still tuning into Global Quebec’s evening local newscast
Still? We had three or more to begin with?
Sorta like 940 News’ Joe Cannon doing a show about Montreal, never bothering to mention that he’s actually doing it from his home in Florida.
Loser policies bring loser results.
Humm, have you watched the news on ABC 22? It’s shamlessely advertised as Fox 44. At first I thought my mind was playing tricks on me. And yes, It the same nes broadcast on the Fox station. It has the same generic feel, and I have to wonder why someone who’s in Burlington would care about some traffic accident in Massachussets?…
this is common in europe, it’s efficient and communicates the same information… for the people who actually still watch the 6 o’clock news, it’s probably enough… it’s not like they are looking for some kind of sophisticated nuanced view of the world… for godsakes, they are watching Global…
Global is a useless network. Too bad they are part of the same group that owns The Gazette. I remember during the shooting at Dawson, Global was nowhere to be seen. They ran a soap opera, while the rest of Montreal cared what was going on. They gave me all kinds of excuses when I called them on it. But every other “local” network was there.
Beaudrillard’s vision was true. We’re all F’d
It’s not like they’re running it all from Calgary… yet. At least ON and PQ are neighbours.
Pingback: Globalisation part II: your local news goes on tour « …ontheroad
Hannah is in Montreal. The desk the anchors sit at is the only real thing on the set. And there’s no “Global Quebec” desk at the Ottawa bureau AFAIK.
I thought Jamie did Global National from Montreal also, but she actually was in Ottawa.
btw, you’re right about the weather guy. He should just be vague like the people at the Weather Network.
Global Quebec will be finished in one or two years, I am leaving soon
Look’s like the joke is on you! Hannah is in Montreal. She is sitting at the Global Quebec desk, and the desk is the real thing.
So no they are not lying, that’s what your doing.
Nice photo of Hannah – yes she is in Montreal when she does these shows for local. Feel for the Maritime viewers though – see the plasma screen over Hannah’s shoulder – in the Maritimes it still says Global Quebec. One thing I really “like” is the delay between throws between sports and the anchor of the late show – it’s like talking to someone across the country – oh wait: the sports dudes are in Vancouver!!!
Pingback: Notebook from Global Montreal – Fagstein