A young girl finds drugs on a street in Laval that’s apparently known for being sketchy.
Her name? Marie-Jane.
A young girl finds drugs on a street in Laval that’s apparently known for being sketchy.
Her name? Marie-Jane.
Newmindspace are cutting the notice a bit close, but they’ve finally set a date for their
metro party: Tomorrow (Friday) at 9pm, starting in the last car at the Henri-Bourassa metro station.
I’ll be writing about it.
Apparently important people spent valuable time discovering that astrology doesn’t work.
Now that that’s settled…
Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t Niagara Falls flow into Canada from the U.S.?
If so, why would someone think they could cross into the States through it on an air mattress?
I’m thinking it’s time to start a “catfight” category, what with stories like this popping up. Apparently Nova Scotia is mocking Calgary in an ad campaign, and (surprise) Calgary isn’t impressed.
My favourite part is the Calgary alderman who notes that if Nova Scotia wants its poor, unemployed homeless deadbeats back, they’re welcome to them.
Snap!
Kate points us to this Hour piece which has some amazingly common-sense opinions on the reasonable accomodation debate.
Hey, remember this guy from Page A3 of yesterday’s Gazette?
Boy does he have a creepy face. I bet he’s guilty.
Yeah, well, funny story:

At least they didn’t accidentally identify a lawyer as a terrorist.
UPDATE: Regret the Error noticed it too, but my screenshot is much better, no?
I’ll spare you the he-said- he-said- his-party-issued-a-press-release- his-party-issued-one-too-so-he-wouldn’t-be-left-out of the campaign stories today, but there are some interesting tidbits.
André Boisclair, I guess thinking that he wasn’t getting enough controversy, has decided to weigh in on the latest reasonable accomodation debate involving Muslim women that somehow has become an issue only during this election (did Muslim women not vote in 2003?). The odd thing about it is that yet again Boisclair is taking the “it’s unreasonable” side of the debate. I thought the PQ was supposed to be the left-wing party? And I thought left-wing people were pro-Muslim? They are at Concordia at least.
Then I think back to Boisclair’s major talking point: “The regions.” He’s not courting votes in Montreal, he’s going after rural communities. The poorer, Catholic, xenophobic areas like Hérouxville that could go to any of the three parties. So while his party thinks of itself as enlightened (after all, it elected an openly gay leader), he’s pushing it into Reform Party-like xenophobia.
Meanwhile, Peggy Curran is implying that activist students, who were denouncing Charest and Dumont (but didn’t seem to mention Boisclair), are taking a pro-PQ stance, despite claiming they’re not partisan. I wonder if these students agree with the PQ leader’s interpretation of what a reasonable accomodation is.
Dumont is apologizing for a candidate in Abitibi-Est whose “business” website apparently accused Jews of a worldwide financial conspiracy or something, while discussing “questions of international finance and banking in an awkward way.” Sure, if by “awkward” you mean “complete nutcase.” Oooh, let’s make all the links move back and forth and choose random colours for everything. I’ve seen 12-year-olds make better websites on MySpace. And read more coherent economic analyses from them too.
I can’t seem to find the offending text through the WayBack machine, though its latest version of the site is from a year ago.
The Gazette’s Saroj Bains has videos up of the three campaign buses: Kevin Dougherty on the Liberal bus, Hubert Bauch on the PQ bus, and Mario Dumont gives a tour of the ADQ bus. Apparently a fancy coffee machine is enough to keep the reporters in line.
According to the Burlington Free Press, Montrealers love to steal their cars.
No, not her, the one on the left. Just look at the way she holds that minidisc player.
Mrs. Black, meanwhile, appears to favour gloves and bling.
That’s about all that’s interesting coming out of the Conrad Black trial so far. But hey, put it on the front page.
Happy Stephen Colbert Day.
Apparently intrepid CBC radio reporter Shawn Apel “almost died” yesterday. I’m not sure if the fact that a Le Devoir journalist came to his rescue should be considered ironic.
The Park Ave. YMCA has decided to replace their frosted windows with unfrosted ones, wasting yet more money on this stupid reasonable accomodation debate. (Fark thread)
Though the media is going all crazy over the federal budget being announced now (especially with the Liberals and NDP announcing they won’t support it), it looks like another snoozer with no tax bracket alterations, no GST cut, and only a bunch of minor fiddlings with the tax code and spending initiatives.
One change that caught my eye was the introduction of a Registered Disability Savings Plan (in the works for over a year, it seems), which helps parents save for their disabled children. The name is somewhat of a misnomer. It’s more like turning disabled children into mini-charities, and making contributions to their well-being tax-deductible.
The thing that bothers me most about it is that the government isn’t actually contributing anything to these kids. Shouldn’t services for people with disabilities be covered by the government, either through health care or other services?
And doesn’t saving for a disability just sound weird?
Nice to see some people still do things the way our forefathers did.