So this kid Justin Darlington likes to dunk basketballs, and apparently he does it so well he’s getting media attention just being in Montreal. So much in fact that two Montreal newspapers have created videos about him.
So judge for yourself: which of the following does the better job?
Quebec, where for some reason it’s always autumn and always sunset.
I also particularly enjoy how Quebec presents itself in as many languages as possible when it comes to tourists, while simultaneously spending millions of dollars enforcing laws meant to restrict the use of those tourists’ languages or just make them feel unwelcome.
Most of these are in the form of oddities, those non-news “before we go” or “finally tonight” segments meant to give people a chuckle. So at least the TV news people don’t take them too seriously.
Still, it’s amazing what people can see human faces in.
If you’ll excuse me, I think I see Jesus in that melting snowbank…
Unfortunately, Radio-Canada is using Microsoft Silverlight for its video, which meant I had to install that software and then switch from Firefox to Safari in order to see it. Is Flash-based video still too difficult? Or Quicktime? Or YouTube?
This video, complete with fake old-style-cinema lines, shows a bunch of headlines from francophone Montreal newspapers, without any sound or other commentary. But the message it’s trying to convey comes out pretty clearly.
Rue Frontenac had the news EN PRIMEUR this morning, a result of an ENQUÊTE EXCLUSIF: The Journal de Montréal is subcontracting its subscription marketing to a company that’s not registered and is perhaps not being entirely honest with people. (THE HORROR!) This investigation involved the usual Journal technique of going undercover and exposing all of the inner dealings, then talking to experts about how this might be illegal if anyone cared to prosecute. It caught Lagacé’s attention, at least.
Meanwhile
Some thoughts on the Canadianization of the Journal, which predates the lockout (but was certainly made worse with it). Examples include the Beijing Olympics and the latest federal election, which were covered by anglophone Sun Media employees instead of Journal de Montréal writers. Not only does this mean the articles need to be translated into French, but the author argues it robs the issues of a necessary Quebec perspective.
Claudette Carbonneau, head of the CSN, is furious with the Journal (sending lawyer’s letters) for saying she was downplaying the current economic crisis. The letters argue that this incorrect summary of her position was done maliciously to attack her reputation.
More coverage from the New York Times and OJR, which seems to think (somewhat naively I think) that someone else could profit off this by starting up a new online-only news source. Poynter also has some analysis of why the paper had to shut down (and couldn’t just go online-only).
What’s truly sad, though, is that this won’t be the last newspaper closing this year. We’ve barely scratched through the tip of the iceberg.
This page from London’s Daily Mirror from last year is getting passed around online as of late. A fellow editor spotted it on LiveJournal. It’s also on Reddit, which pointed directly to an image on Joey deVilla’s blog. Here’s his blog post from June, where the image originates.
The layout of the article here looks funny to me, but that’s because I work for a broadsheet instead of a tabloid. It also shows the problem when editorial and advertising put together parts of a page without seeing what the other is doing until after edition.
With the recent comment moderation scandal at the CBC (yeah, I’ll just go ahead and call it a scandal there), some people have asked whether we’re all that interested in hearing uninformed comments from random people attached to news stories.
I’ve argued before that high-traffic websites (like CBC) should be more stringent with moderation, because nobody is going to read through hundreds of comments for the few that are actually worth reading. At the very least, some sort of comment ranking or “featured comments” system should be put in place to make the quality ones stand out.
I also argue against so-called “reverse publishing”, where anonymous or pseudonymous web comments are republished in offline media.
This video, spotted on Nora Young’s Spark blog, is a good (and funny) example of the pointlessness of filling the airwaves with comments from random people who don’t know what they’re talking about. (I could have also posted a video of CNN’s Rick Sanchez reading Twitter comments, but that’s more sad than funny.)